Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A projectile is a distance r from the center of a heavenly body and is heading directly away. Classically, if the sum of its kinetic and potential energies is positive, it will escape the gravitational pull of the body, but if negative, it cannot escape. Now imagine that the projectile is a pulse of light energy E. Since light has no internal energy ,E is also the kinetic energy of the light pulse. Suppose that the gravitational potential energy of the light pulse is given by Newton’s classical formula U=-(GMm/r), where M is the mass of the heavenly body and m is an “effective mass” of the light pulse. Assume that this effective mass is given by m=E/c2.

Show that the critical radius for which light could not escape the gravitational pull of a heavenly body is within a factor of 2 of the Schwarzschild radius given in the chapter. (This kind of “semiclassical” approach to general relativity is sometimes useful but always vague. To be reliable, predictions must be based from beginning to end on the logical, but unfortunately complex, fundamental equations of general relativity.)

Short Answer

Expert verified

The critical radius for which the light could not escape the gravitational pull of a heavenly body is within a factor of 2 of the Schwarzschild radius, is proved.

Step by step solution

01

Identification of given data

The given data can be listed below as:

  • The distance of the particle from the heavenly body is r.
  • The energy of the projectile is E.
  • The mass of the heavenly body is M.
  • The effective mass of the light pulse is m.
02

Significance of the critical radius

The critical radius is mainly described as the lowest radius which an atom form. It is also described as the minimum size of a particle.

03

Determination of the critical radius

As the total energy of the particle is zero, then the equation of the total energy is expressed as:

KE + PE = 0

Here, KE is the kinetic and PE is the potential energy.

Substitute E for KE and-GMmrfor PE in the above equation.

E-GMmr=0

Here, E is the energy of the particle, G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the heavenly body, m is the effective mass of the light pulse and r is the distance of the particle from the heavenly body.

Substitute Ec2for in the above equation.

E-GMErc2=0E1-GMrc2=0

The next equation can be expressed as:

1-GMrc2=01=GMrc2r=GMc2

The equation of the Schawzschild radius is expressed as:

rs=2GMc2

Here, rsis the Schawzschild radius.

Here, in the case of the Schawzschild radius, it can be identified that the critical radius is lesser than the factor of 2 than the Schawzschild radius.

Light can only escape the gravitational pull if the addition of the kinetic and the potential energy is greater than zero but, in this case, the addition is equal to zero.

Thus, the critical radius for which the light could not escape the gravitational pull of a heavenly body is within a factor of 2 of the Schwarzschild radius, is proved.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Equation (2-30) is an approximation correct only if the gravitational time-dilation effect is small. In this exercise, it is also assumed to be small. but we still allow for a nonuniform gravitational field. We start with (2-29), based on the Doppler effect in the accelerating frame. Consider two elevations, the lower at r1 and the upper at r1+dr. Equation (2·29) becomes

f(r1+dr)f(r1)=(1-gr1drc2)

Similarly, if we consider elevationsdata-custom-editor="chemistry" r1+dr and data-custom-editor="chemistry" r1+2dr, we have

f(r1+2dr)f(r1+dr)=(1-gr1+drdrc2)

We continue the process, incrementing r by dr, until we reach r2.

f(r2)f(r2-dr)=(1-gr2-drdrc2)

Now imagine multiplying the left sides of all the equations and setting the product equal to the product of all the right sides. (a) Argue that the left side of the product is simply f(r2)/f(r1). (b) Assuming that the termgdr/c2 in each individual equation is very small. so that productsof such termscan be ignored, argue that the right side of the product is

1-1c2g(r)dr

(c) Deduceg(r) from Newton’s universal law of gravitation, then argue that equation (2-31) follows from the result, just as (2-30) does from (2-29).

Consider the collision of two particles, each of mass mo. In experiment A, a particle moving at 0.9cstrikes a stationary particle.

  1. What is the total kinetic energy before the collision?
  2. In experiment B, both particles are moving at a speed u(relative to the lab), directly towards one another. If the total kinetic energy before the collision in experiment B is the same as that in experiment A, what is u?
  3. In both particles, the particles stick together. Find the mass of the resulting single particle in each experiment. In which is more of the initial kinetic energy converted to mass?

Question: A rocket maintains a constant thrust F, giving it an acceleration of g

(i.e.,9.8m/s2).

(a) If classical physics were valid, how long would it take for the rocket’s speed to reach 0.99c??

(b) Using the result of exercise 117(c), how long would it really take to reach 0.99c??

u=11+(Ft/mc)2FTt

The diagram shows Bob's view of the passing of two identical spaceship. Anna's and his own, where γv=2. The length of either spaceship in its rest frame is . What are the readings on Anna', two unlabelled clocks?

Question: Show that equation (2-36) follows from the arbitrary four-vector Lorentz transformation equations (2-35).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free