Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Imagine two classical charges of -q, each bound to a central charge of. +q One -q charge is in a circular orbit of radius R about its +q charge. The other oscillates in an extreme ellipse, essentially a straight line from it’s +q charge out to a maximum distance rmax.The two orbits have the same energy. (a) Show thatrmax=2r. (b) Considering the time spent at each orbit radius, in which orbit is the -q charge farther from its +q charge on average?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a) The radius can’t be more thanrmax=2R

b) In the ellipse orbit, the electron will be farther from its +q charge.

Step by step solution

01

 Given data

Two -q charges revolve around +q charge.

One -q charge is in a circular orbit and the other -q is oscillate in an extreme ellipse.

Charge both circular and ellipse orbits have the same energy.

02

Concept  

The electron whose orbit is in the shape of an extreme ellipse moves faster when it is close to the positive charge whereas it slows down when reaches the farther region of the orbit, from the central charge.

03

 Solution

For the charge that is moving in a circular orbit, the potential energy is given by

PE=-e24π0R

The circular orbit gives,

e24π0R=mv2R

Rearranging the above equation formv2

mv2=e24π0R

The kinetic energy is then given as-

KE=12mv2=12e24π0R

The total energy is then given as-

E=PE+KE=-12e24π0R

For the extreme ellipse orbit, the max radius happens when potential energy equals total energy.

-e24π0R=-12e24π0Rr=2R

Hence, proved. The radius can't be more thanrmax=2R.

b)

In case of the circular orbit, the motion of the –q charge is uniform about the same distance from the central charge. To keep it simple, though, we will approximate the orbital motion along the extreme ellipse to be a (1-dimensional) radial oscillation about the central charge.

As the -q charge executes its simple harmonic motion along the radial direction, its speed changes, so the time it spends in each part of the path accordingly.

The probability density of finding the oscillating charge at a distance r from the central charge (located at r = 0) takes the form

Pr=-2xrmax2-r

The probability of finding the oscillating charge in the region between rmax2and rmaxis the integral

Prmax2<r<rmax=rmax2rmaxprdr

Substituting for P(r) and using the proper trigonometric substitution, we find

Prmax2<r<rmax=2πrmax2rmaxprdr=2πsin-1rrmaxrmax2rmax=2ππ2-π6=23

Therefore, the negative charge, in the circular orbit, spends all of its time at a fixed radial distance R=rmax/2from the central charge. it is clear that in the elliptical orbit, –q charge will be, on average, farther from its central positive charge.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A particular vibrating diatomic molecule may be treated as a simple harmonic oscillator. Show that a transition from that n=2state directly to n=0ground state cannot occur by electric dipole radiation.

What is a quantum number, and how does it arise?

The Diatomic Molecule: Exercise 80 discusses the idea of reduced mass. Classically or quantum mechanically, we can digest the behavior of a two-particle system into motion of the center of mass and motion relative to the center of mass. Our interest here is the relative motion, which becomes a one-particle problem if we merely use μfor the mass for that particle. Given this simplification, the quantum-mechanical results we have learned go a long way toward describing the diatomic molecule. To a good approximation, the force between the bound atoms is like an ideal spring whose potential energy is 12kx2, where x is the deviation of the atomic separation from its equilibrium value, which we designate with an a. Thus,x=r-a . Because the force is always along the line connecting the two atoms, it is a central force, so the angular parts of the Schrödinger equation are exactly as for hydrogen, (a) In the remaining radial equation (7- 30), insert the potential energy 12kx2and replace the electron massm with μ. Then, with the definition.f(r)=rR(r), show that it can be rewritten as

-ħ22μd2dr2f(r)+ħ2I(I+1)2μr2f(r)+12kx2f(r)=Ef(r)

With the further definition show that this becomes

-ħ22μd2dx2g(x)+ħ2I(I+1)2μ(x+a)g(x)+12kx2g(x)=Eg(x)

(b) Assume, as is quite often the case, that the deviation of the atoms from their equilibrium separation is very small compared to that separation—that is,x<<a. Show that your result from part (a) can be rearranged into a rather familiar- form, from which it follows that
E=(n+12)ħkμ+ħ2I(I+1)2μa2n=0,1,2,...I=0,1,2,...

(c)

Identify what each of the two terms represents physically.

Knowing precisely all components of a nonzero Lwould violate the uncertainty principle, but knowingthat Lis precisely zerodoes not. Why not?

(Hint:For l=0 states, the momentum vector p is radial.)

Taking then=3states as representative, explain the relationship between the complexity numbers of nodes and antinodes-of hydrogen's standing waves in the radial direction and their complexity in the angular direction at a given value of n. Is it a direct or inverse relationship, and why?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free