Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

(a) What is the expectation value of the distance from the proton of an electron in a 3p state? (b) How does this compare with the expectation value in the 3 d state, calculated in Example 7.7? Discuss any differences.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a) The expectation value of the distance between proton and electron in 3p state is 3ao,6ao,12ao.

b) The expectation value of the distance between proton and electron in 3d state is 12ao..

Step by step solution

01

 Given data

At 3p state, the radius function is given by

R3,1(r)=1(3ao)3/2429a01-r6aor-r(3ao)

02

Concept

The probability of finding an electron in a given region of an atom is given by the square of the wave function of that electron integrated over the given region. The orbital in an atom is the region where the probability of finding an electron is 90% .

The probability density is

p(r)r2R3,12(r)=r2rr-r6aoe-r/(3ao)2=r4e-2r/(3a0)1-r6ao2=r4-r53ao+r636a02e-2r/(3ao)

03

Calculation

To calculate maximum value, derivate probability density function and equate to 0

dprdr=0

Using the value of p(r) calculated above

role="math" localid="1659183593664" ddrr4-r53ao+r636a02e-2r/(3ao)=04r3-5r43ao+r56a02e-2r/(3ao)+r4-r53ao+r636a02-23aoe-2r/(3ao)=0e-2r/(3ao)4r3-5r43ao+r56a02+r4-r53ao+r636a02-23ao=0r3e-2r/(3ao)4-7r3ao+7r218a02-r354a03=0

The above equation holds forr=0andr= , but they are points of minima. For maxima the term in parentheses must be zero.

4-7r3ao+7r218a02-r354a03=0

The expectation values are3ao,6ao,12ao

b)

The electron is in a 3d state. Therefore, the most probable location is at r=12ao. This value is more than the most probable radius for a 3d electron.

The graph for the 3p electron is more spread and has more radial energy but the 3d electron has more rotational energy.

The expectation value in 3 d state is12ao .

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A particular vibrating diatomic molecule may be treated as a simple harmonic oscillator. Show that a transition from that n=2state directly to n=0ground state cannot occur by electric dipole radiation.

A comet of 1014kg mass describes a very elliptical orbit about a star of mass3×1030kg , with its minimum orbit radius, known as perihelion, being role="math" localid="1660116418480" 1011m and its maximum, or aphelion, 100 times as far. When at these minimum and maximum

radii, its radius is, of course, not changing, so its radial kinetic energy is 0, and its kinetic energy is entirely rotational. From classical mechanics, rotational energy is given by L22I, where Iis the moment of inertia, which for a “point comet” is simply mr2.

(a) The comet’s speed at perihelion is6.2945×104m/s . Calculate its angular momentum.

(b) Verify that the sum of the gravitational potential energy and rotational energy are equal at perihelion and aphelion. (Remember: Angular momentum is conserved.)

(c) Calculate the sum of the gravitational potential energy and rotational energy when the orbit radius is 50 times perihelion. How do you reconcile your answer with energy conservation?

(d) If the comet had the same total energy but described a circular orbit, at what radius would it orbit, and how would its angular momentum compare with the value of part (a)?

(e) Relate your observations to the division of kinetic energy in hydrogen electron orbits of the same nbut different I.

Question: A particle is trapped in a spherical infinite well. The potential energy is 0for r < a and infinite for r > a . Which, if any, quantization conditions would you expect it to share with hydrogen, and why?

Show that of hydrogen’s spectral series—Lyman, Balmer, Paschen, and so on—only the four Balmer lines of Section 3 are in visible range (400-700nm)

In hydrogen’s characteristic spectra, each series - the Lyman, the Balmer, and so on – has a “series limit,” where the wavelengths at one end of the series tend to bunch up, approaching a single limiting value. Is it at the short-wavelength or the long-wavelength end of the series that the series limit occurs, and what is it about hydrogen’s allowed energies that leads to this phenomenon? Does the infinite well have series limits?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free