Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Question: Verify the correctness of the normalization constant of the radial wave function given in Table 7.4 as

1(2a0)3/23a0

Short Answer

Expert verified

Answer

It has been proved that the normalization for the case 2pstateis correct.

Step by step solution

01

Given data

The radial wave function corresponding to the state is,

Rn/lr=re-r2a02a03/23a0

02

Normalization condition

The radial part of the Hydrogen atom wave function should satisfy the condition as,

0{Rn/lr}2r2dr=1

03

Determining whether the given normalization constant is correct

Check equation (I) with the given wave function as:

=12a033a00r4e-ra0dr=124a030r4e-ra0dr

Let us assume,

r/a0=zr=a0zdr=a0dz

Then the integral becomes

=124a05a050z4e-zdz=Γ524=4!24=2424=1

Here Γ5 is the gamma function.

Thus the normalization is correct.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Doubly ionized lithium, Li2+absorbs a photon and jumps from the ground state to its n=2level. What was the wavelength of the photon?

For the more circular orbits, =n-1and

P(r)r2ne-2r/na0

a) Show that the coefficient that normalizes this probability is

localid="1660047077408" (2na0)2n+11(2n)!

b) Show that the expectation value of the radius is given by

r¯=n(n+12)a0

and the uncertainty by

Δr=na0n2+14

c) What happens to the ratioΔr/r¯in the limit of large n? Is this large-n limit what would be expected classically?

Question: Consider a cubic 3D infinite well of side length of L. There are 15 identical particles of mass m in the well, but for whatever reason, no more than two particles can have the same wave function. (a) What is the lowest possible total energy? (b) In this minimum total energy state, at what point(s) would the highest energy particle most likely be found? (Knowing no more than its energy, the highest energy particle might be in any of multiple wave functions open to it and with equal probability.)

In Table 7.5, the pattern that develops with increasing n suggests that the number of different sets ofl,mlvalues for a given energy level n isn2. Prove this mathematically by summing the allowed values ofmlfor a givenlover the allowed values oflfor a given n.

Consider an electron in the ground state of a hydrogen atom. (a) Sketch plots of E and U(r) on the same axes (b) Show that, classically, an electron with this energy should not be able to get farther than 2a0from the proton. (c) What is the probability of the electron being found in the classically forbidden region?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free