Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider a cubic 3D infinite well.

(a) How many different wave functions have the same energy as the one for which (nx,ny,nz)=(5,1,1)?

(b) Into how many different energy levels would this level split if the length of one side were increased by 5% ?

(c) Make a scale diagram, similar to Figure 3, illustrating the energy splitting of the previously degenerate wave functions.

(d) Is there any degeneracy left? If so, how might it be “destroyed”?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) There are two other wave functions having the same energy as the one for which nx,ny,nz=5,1,1.

(b) This energy level would split into two new energy levels if the length of one side is increased by 5%.

(c) The scale diagram is as follows

(d) There will still be two wave functions having the same energy. This can be removed by changing any of the side lengths by a small amount.

Step by step solution

01

Given data

There is a 3D infinite cubic well.

02

Energy in an infinite well

The energy of a particle of mass m in a 3D infinite well of sides Lx, Lyand Lz is

E=π222mnx2Lx2+ny2Ly2+nz2Lz2 ..... (I)

Here, is the reduced Planck's constant and nx, ny and nz are the quantum numbers

03

Step 3:Determining the degeneracy of energy in a cubic well

(a)

For a cubic well, the energy in equation (I) reduces to

E=π222mL2nx2+ny2+nz2 ..... (II)

Thus the energy when any one of nx,ny,nz is 5 and the rest two are 1 are the same. Hence the wave functions corresponding to nx,ny,nz=5,1,1, nx,ny,nz=1,5,1 and nx,ny,nz=1,1,5 have the same energies. There are three wave functions having the same energy.

04

Determining the splitting in energy level

(b)

Let the length along X axis, that isLx be increased by 5%. The new length is then $1.05L$. The energy in equation (II) becomes

E=π222mL2nx21.052+ny2+nz2

Thus the wave function corresponding tonx,ny,nz=5,1,1will now have lower energy than the wave functions corresponding to nx,ny,nz=1,5,1andnx,ny,nz=1,1,5. The previous energy level will thus split into two separate energy levels.

05

Plotting the energy levels

(c)

The plot of the initial and final energy levels are as follows

06

Determining the residual degeneracy

(d)

There are still two wave functions corresponding to nx,ny,nz=1,5,1 and nx,ny,nz=1,1,5 that are in the same energy level. Thus a degeneracy of 2 is left. This can be removed if one of the lengths along x or y axis is slightly changed making the energy equation equal to equation (I).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A particle orbiting due to an attractive central force has angular momentum L=1.00×10-33kg.m/s What z-components of angular momentum is it possible to detect?

At heart, momentum conservation is related to the universe being "translationally invariant," meaning that it is the same if you shift your coordinates to the right or left. Angular momentum relates to rotational invariance. Use these ideas to explain at least some of the differences between the physical properties quantized in the cubic three-dimensional box versus the hydrogen atom.

An electron is in the 3d state of a hydrogen atom. The most probable distance of the electron from the proton is9ao. What is the probability that the electron would be found between8aoand10ao?

In Table 7.5, the pattern that develops with increasing n suggests that the number of different sets ofl,mlvalues for a given energy level n isn2. Prove this mathematically by summing the allowed values ofmlfor a givenlover the allowed values oflfor a given n.

Classically, an orbiting charged particle radiates electromagnetic energy, and for an electron in atomic dimensions, it would lead to collapse in considerably less than the wink of an eye.

(a) By equating the centripetal and Coulomb forces, show that for a classical charge -e of mass m held in a circular orbit by its attraction to a fixed charge +e, the following relationship holds

ω=er-3/24πε0m.

(b) Electromagnetism tells us that a charge whose acceleration is a radiates power P=e2a2/6ε0c3. Show that this can also be expressed in terms of the orbit radius as P=e696π2ε03m2c3r4. Then calculate the energy lost per orbit in terms of r by multiplying the power by the period T=2π/ωand using the formula from part (a) to eliminate .

(c) In such a classical orbit, the total mechanical energy is half the potential energy, or Eorbit=-e28πε0r. Calculate the change in energy per change in r : dEorbit/dr. From this and the energy lost per obit from part (b), determine the change in per orbit and evaluate it for a typical orbit radius of 10-10m. Would the electron's radius change much in a single orbit?

(d) Argue that dividing dEorbit/dr by P and multiplying by dr gives the time required to change r by dr . Then, sum these times for all radii from rinitial to a final radius of 0. Evaluate your result for rinitial=10-10m. (One limitation of this estimate is that the electron would eventually be moving relativistically).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free