Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In an assembly of fissionable material. The larger the surface area per fissioning nucleus (i.e. per unit volume), the more likely is the escape of valuable neutrons.

(a) What is the surface-to-volume ratio of a sphere of radius r?

(b) What is the surface-to-volume ratio of a cube of the same volume?

(c) What is the surface-to-volume ratio of a sphere of twice the volume?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a)3r0

(b)6l

(c)2.38r0

Step by step solution

01

Find the surface-to-volume ratio of the sphere

We need to find the surface-to-volume ratio of a sphere of radius after that, the surface-to-volume ratio of a cube of the same volume, and finally, the surface-to-volume ratio of a sphere of twice the volume. Surface area to volume ratio can be found easily for several simple shapes, like, for example, a cube or a sphere:

(a)

For a sphere, the equation for the surface area is S=4ฯ€r02where r0is the radius of the sphere. The volume of a sphere is V=43ฯ€r03.

So for a cube, the ratio of surface area to volume is SV.

Therefore,

.SV=4ฯ€r043ฯ€r03=3r0

Thus, the surface-to-volume ratio of the sphere is3r0 .

02

Find the surface-to-volume ratio of the cube

(b)

For a cube, the equation for the surface area iss=6l2 where l is the length of a side. Similarly, the volume of a cube isV=l3 .

So for a cube, the ratio of the surface area to volume isSV .

Therefore,

SV=6l2l3=6l

Thus, the surface-to-volume ratio of the cube is6l

03

Finding the surface-to-volume ratio of a sphere of twice the volume

(c)

For a sphere, the surface area isS=4ฯ€r02where is the radius of the sphere and pi is 3.14.

The volume of the sphere is V'=243ฯ€r03. Since the sphere is twice the volume, we have 2V. the radiusr'=21/3r0

So, for a sphere, the ratio of surface area to volume is SV'.

Therefore,

SV'=4ฯ€r0243ฯ€r'3=321/3r0=2.38r0

Thus, the surface-to-volume ratio of a sphere of twice the volume is 2.38r0.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Question:In Section 11.2, it is said that iron and nickel represent maximum stability. Chemistry emphasizes that helium is the most stable element? How can these claims be reconciled?

You occupy a one-dimensional world in which beads of mass m0 when isolated-attract each other if and only if in contact. Were the beads to interact solely by this attraction, it would take energyH to break the contact. Consequently. We could extract this much energy by sticking two together. However, they also share a repulsive force, no matter what their separation. For which the potential energy isU(r)=0.85Ha/r . Whererole="math" localid="1660033271423" a is a bead's radius andr is centre to centre separation. The closer the beads. The higher is this energy.

(a) For one stationary bead, by how much does the energy differ fromm0c2?

(b) For two stationary beads in contact, by how much does the energy differ from 2m0c2?

(c) For three beads in contact (in a line, of course, since this world is one-dimensional). by how much does the energy differ from3m022 ?

(d) For four beads in contact, by how much does the energy differ from 4m0c2?

(e) If you had 12 isolated beads and wished to extract the most energy by sticking them together (in linear groupings), into sets of what number would you group them?

(f) Sets of what number would be suitable fuel for the release of fusion energy? Or fission energy?

According to the semiempirical binding energy formula, what should be binding energy per nucleon of technetium -98 .

For the lightest of nuclei, binding energy per nucleon is not a very reliable gauge of stability. There s no nucleon binding at all for a single proton or neutron yet one is stable (so far as we know) and the other is not(a) Helium-3 and hydrogen-3 (tritium) differ only in the switch of a nucleon. Which has the higher binding energy per nucleon? (b) Helium-3 is stable, while tritium, in fact, decays into helium-3.Does this somehow violate laws?

How much Kinetic energy released and what is the daughter nucleus in the ฮฒ+ decay of nitrogen-13?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free