Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

To show,

(a) Ψ1(x,t)=Aeikxiωtis the solution of both Klein-Gordon and the Schrodinger equations.

(b) Ψ2(x,t)=Aeikxcosωtis the solution of both Klein-Gordon but not the Schrodinger equations.

(c) TheΨ2 is a combination of positive and negative energy solutions of the Klein-Gordon equation.

(d) To compare the time dependence ofΨ2 for Ψ1and Ψ2.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The solution of both Klein-Gordon and the Schrodinger equations isΨ1(x,t)=Aeikxiωt.

(b) The solution of both Klein-Gordon but not the Schrodinger equations Ψ2(x,t)=Aeikxcosωt.

(c) The first part 12Aeikx+iωt is the negative energy solution, and the second part 12Aeikxiωt is the positive energy.

(d) The function|Ψ1|2 doesn't have the time dependence but |Ψ2|2 has the time dependence.

Step by step solution

01

Given data

The given functions are Ψ1 andΨ2 .

02

Concept of the Wave equation

The Klein-Gordon equation is given as,

c222x2Ψ(x,t)+m2c4Ψ(x,t)=22t2Ψ(x,t)

.

The Schrödinger Equation is given as,

.

22m2x2Ψ(x,t)=itΨ(x,t)

03

Take second order partial derivative of the Candidate wave function Ψ1(x,t)=Aeikx−iωt

(a)

Second order partial derivative of the wave function with respect to x as:

2dx2Ψ1(x,t)=k2Ψ1(x,t) ……(1)

Second order partial derivative of the wave function with respecttas:

2t2Ψ1(x,t)=ω2Ψ1(x,t) …….(2)

After substitution equations (1) and (2) in the Klein-Gordon equation, obtain:

c2k22Ψ1(x,t)+m2c4Ψ1(x,t)=ω22Ψ1(x,t)

Substitute p=k andE=ω in the above equation and simplify as:

c2p2+m2c4=E2

From special relativity, the wave function is proved to be a solution.

04

Take first order partial derivative of Candidate function Ψ1(x,t)=Aeikx−iωt

Taking first order partial derivative of the Candidate wave function with respect to x as:

tΨ1(x,t)=t(Aeikxiωt)=iωΨ1(x,t)

……(3)

After substitution equations (1) and (3) in the Schrödinger equation, obtain:

2k22mΨ1(x,t)=p22mΨ1(x,t)

On the right, we have,

.ωΨ1(x,t)=EΨ1(x,t)

For nonrelativistic particles,

.E=p22m

The wave function is proved to be a solution.

Ψ1(x,t)=Aeikxiωtis the solution of both Klein-Gordon and the Schrodinger equations.

05

Take second order partial derivative of the Candidate wave functionΨ2(x,t)=Aeikxcosωt  

(b)

The Candidate wave function is given as,

.

Ψ2(x,t)=Aeikxcosωt

Second order partial derivative of the Candidate wave function with respect to x as:

2x2Ψ2(x,t)=Aeikxtcosωt±iK2=k2Ψ2(x,t)

Second order partial derivative of the Candidate wave function with respect t as:

2t2Ψ2(x,t)=Aeikxcosωt(ω2)=ω2Ψ2(x,t)

From special relativity, the wave function is proved to be a solution.

Similarly, takethe first order partial derivative of the Candidate wave function with respect to x as:

tΨ2(x,t)=Aeikxsinωt(ω)ωΨ2(x,t)

The wave function is proved not to be a solution.

Ψ2(x,t)=Aeikxcosωtis the solution of both Klein-Gordon but not the Schrodinger equations.

06

Calculation to show  Ψ2 is a combination of positive and negative energy solutions 

(c)

The Candidate wave function is given, as shown below:

Ψ2(x,t)=Aeikxcosωtcosθ=eix+eix2

The Candidate wave function is given as,

Ψ2(x,t)=Aeikxcosωt

After the expansion ofcosωt in exponential terms, obtain:

Ψ2(x,t)=AeikxcosωtΨ2(x,t)=Aeikxeiωt+eiax2Ψ2(x,t)=12Aeikx+iωt+12Aeikxiωt

The first part 12Aeikx+iωtis the negative energy solution, and the second part 12Aeikxiωtis a positive energy.

07

Comparison of the time dependence of   Ψ2forΨ1   and  Ψ2 

(d)

The Candidate wave function is given as,

.Ψ1(x,t)=Aeikxiωt

The probability density is given as follows:

|ψ1(x,t)|2=(Aeikxiωt)2|ψ1(x,t)|2=A2

For the first Candidate, since all the positive and time dependence is in terms of the exponential of an imaginary number,

|ψ1(x,t)|2=A2

So, it does not have time dependence.

The Candidate wave function is given as,

.Ψ2(x,t)=Aeikxcosωt

The probability density is given as below:

|ψ2(x,t)|2=(Aeikxcosωt)2|ψ2(x,t)|2=A2cos2ωt

So, it does have time dependence.

The function |Ψ1|2doesn't have the time dependence but|Ψ2|2 has the time dependence.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

To show that the Klein-Gordon equation has valid solutions for negative values of E, verify that equation (12-4) is satisfied by a wave function of the form .ψ(x,t)=Ae±ipx/±iEt/

Verify that if the universe were critical (ΩM=1). "flat”(K''=0), and free of a cosmological constant(ΩΛ=0), then equation dR/dtR2=1R3would be satisfied by a scale factorR(t) of[32t13]23.

If a neutrino interacted with a quark every time their separation was within the 1018 m range generally accepted for the weak force, then the cross-section of a neutron or proton “seen” by a neutrino would be on the order of 1036 m2. Even at such separation, however the probability of interactions is quite small. The nucleon appears to have an effective cross-section of only about 1048 m2.

(a) About how many nucleons are there in a column through the earth’s center of 1 m2 cross-sectional area?

(b) what is the probability that a given neutrino passing through space and encountering earth will actually “hit”?

Exercises 23 and 24 give the threshold energies for which two particles of mass m can produce a given mass M in collidingbeam and stationary-target accelerator. Evaluate the two for a collision in which two protons become three protons and one antiproton. How much more energy is neededfor the stationary target?

Exercise 23 discusses the threshold energy for two particles of mass m in a colliding beam accelerator to produce a final stationary mass M. If the accelerator is instead a stationary target type, more initial kinetic energy is needed to produce the same final mass. Show the threshold energy is M22m-2mc2.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free