Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Question: the operator for angular momentum about the z-axis in spherical polar coordinate is -iϕ.find the function fϕ that would have a well-defined z-component of angular momentum.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Answer

The z-component of the general function's angular momentum is well defined is expi2λcϕ.

Step by step solution

01

Identification of given data

The given data can be listed below,

The spherical polar coordinate of the momentum is,ϕ

02

 Step 2: Concept/Significance of angular momentum

An eigenvector is a vector to which a linear operator applies, and the particular multiple is known as the eigenvalue. Everything else that is referred to be an Eigen is one of its eigenvalue or eigenvector, depending on the linear operator.

03

Determination of the function having well-defined  -component of angular momentum.

If the operator acting on the function is a constant multiplied by the same value. As an Eigen function of the operator is given by,

Q^fx=λfx

Here, Q^ is the operator for momentum, λ is the Eigen value of the operator.

Substitute all the values in the above,

-i2λϕfϕ=cfϕϕfϕ=2λc-ifϕfϕ=expi2λcϕ

Thus, the z-component of the general function's angular momentum is well defined is expi2λcϕ.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show that the uncertainty in the momentum of a ground state harmonic oscillator is 2mk1/4.

Show that the uncertainty in the position of a ground state harmonic oscillator is 1/22/mk1/4.

The term interaction is sometimes used interchangeably with force, and other times interchangeably with potential energy. Although force and potential energy certainly aren't the same thing, what justification is there for using the same term to cover both?

Simple models are very useful. Consider the twin finite wells shown in the figure, at First with a tiny separation. Then with increasingly distant separations, In all case, the four lowest allowed wave functions are planned on axes proportional to their energies. We see that they pass through the classically forbidden region between the wells, and we also see a trend. When the wells are very close, the four functions and energies are what we might expect of a single finite well, but as they move apart, pairs of functions converge to intermediate energies.

(a) The energies of the second and fourth states decrease. Based on changing wavelength alone, argue that is reasonable.

(b) The energies of the first and third states increase. Why? (Hint: Study bow the behaviour required in the classically forbidden region affects these two relative to the others.)

(c) The distant wells case might represent two distant atoms. If each atom had one electron, what advantage is there in bringing the atoms closer to form a molecule? (Note: Two electrons can have the same wave function.)

To determine the two bound state energies for the well.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free