Chapter 5: Q69E (page 191)
does the wave function have a well-defined momentum? Explain.
Short Answer
The constant in the front multiplies the initial function and two opposing moving plane waves are added, so the momentum is not clearly defined.
Chapter 5: Q69E (page 191)
does the wave function have a well-defined momentum? Explain.
The constant in the front multiplies the initial function and two opposing moving plane waves are added, so the momentum is not clearly defined.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeWe say that the ground state for the particle in a box has nonzero energy. What goes wrong with in equation 5.16 if n = 0 ?
Whereas an infinite well has an infinite number of bound states, a finite well does not. By relating the well height to the kinetic energy and the kinetic energy (through ) to n and L. Show that the number of bound states is given roughly by (Assume that the number is large.)
Question: the operator for angular momentum about the z-axis in spherical polar coordinate is .find the function that would have a well-defined z-component of angular momentum.
It is possible to take the finite well wave functions further than (21) without approximation, eliminating all but one normalization constant . First, use the continuity/smoothness conditions to eliminate , , and in favor of in (21). Then make the change of variables and use the trigonometric relations
and
on the
functions in region I, . The change of variables shifts the problem so that it is symmetric about , which requires that the probability density be symmetric and thus that be either an odd or even function of . By comparing the region II and region III functions, argue that this in turn demands that must be either +1 (even) or -1 (odd). Next, show that these conditions can be expressed, respectively, as and . Finally, plug these separately back into the region I solutions and show that
or
Note that is now a standard multiplicative normalization constant. Setting the integral of over all space to 1 would give it in terms of and , but because we can’t solve (22) exactly for k(or E), neither can we obtain an exact value for .
The deeper the finite well, the more state it holds. In fact, a new state, the, is added when the well’s depthreaches. (a) Argue that this should be the case based only on, the shape of the wave inside, and the degree of penetration of the classically forbidden region expected for a state whose energy E is only negligibly below. (b) How many states would be found up to this same “height” in an infinite well.
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.