Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

equation (5-33). The twosolutionsare added in equal amounts. Show that if we instead added a different percentage of the two solutions. It would not change the important conclusion related to the oscillation frequency of the charge density.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The frequency of the time-dependent wave function is the same as it was before

Step by step solution

01

Identification of given data

The sum of the two different solutions is Aฯˆnxe-iEn/โ„t+Bฯˆme-iEm/โ„t

02

Concept/significance of oscillation frequency 

The frequency of an oscillation is the number of oscillations that occur once per unit time or once per second. The frequency of an oscillation can be calculated as the inverse of the time of oscillation.

03

Explanation of the adding different percentages of the two solutions 

The wave function of the particle is mathematically presented as:

ฯˆx,t=Aฯˆnxe-iEn/โ„t+Bฯˆme-iEm/โ„t

Multiply the wave function with its complex conjugate as shown below.

ฯˆx,tฯˆ*x,t=Aฯˆnxe-iEn/โ„t+Bฯˆmxe-iEm/โ„tAฯˆnxeiEn/โ„t+BฯˆmeiEm/โ„t=A2ฯˆn2x+B2ฯˆm2x+e-iEn-Em/โ„t+e-iEm-En/โ„t=A2ฯˆn2x+B2ฯˆm2x+2ABฯˆnxฯˆmxcosEn-Emtโ„

Hence, the frequency of the time-dependent wave function is the same as it was before.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Write out the total wave functionฯˆ(x,t).For an electron in the n=3 state of a 10nm wide infinite well. Other than the symbols a and t, the function should include only numerical values?

For a total energy of 0, the potential energy is given in Exercise 96. (a) Given these, to what region of the x-axis would a classical particle be restricted? Is the quantum-mechanical particle similarly restricted? (b) Write an expression for the probability that the (quantum-mechanical) particle would be found in the classically forbidden region, leaving it in the form of an integral. (The integral cannot be evaluated in closed form.)

A finite potential energy function U(x) allows ฯˆ(x) the solution of the time-independent Schrรถdinger equation. to penetrate the classically forbidden region. Without assuming any particular function for U(x) show that b(x) must have an inflection point at any value of x where it enters a classically forbidden region.

Consider the delta well potential energy:

U(x)={0xโ‰ 0-โˆžx=0

Although not completely realistic, this potential energy is often a convenient approximation to a verystrong, verynarrow attractive potential energy well. It has only one allowed bound-state wave function, and because the top of the well is defined as U = 0, the corresponding bound-state energy is negative. Call its value -E0.

(a) Applying the usual arguments and required continuity conditions (need it be smooth?), show that the wave function is given by

ฯˆ(x)=(2mE0h2)1/4e-(2mE0/โ„)|x|

(b) Sketch ฯˆ(x)and U(x) on the same diagram. Does this wave function exhibit the expected behavior in the classically forbidden region?

An electron istrapped in a finite well. How "far" (in eV) is it from being free if the penetration length of its wave function into the classically forbidden region 1nm?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free