Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Show that the uncertainty in the momentum of a ground state harmonic oscillator is 2mk1/4.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The uncertainty in momentum in the ground state of harmonic oscillator is 2mk1/4.

Step by step solution

01

Uncertainty

The uncertainty in the momentum of harmonic oscillator is the deflection from the actual position of the oscillator.

02

Determination of uncertainty in the momentum of harmonic oscillator

The relation between uncertainty in position and momentum is given as:

ΔxΔp=2......1

The angular frequency of the harmonic oscillator is given as:

ω=km

The energy of a quantum harmonic oscillator is given as:

E=Δp22m+12mω2Δx2E=12m2Δx2+12mω2Δx2E=28mΔx2+12mω2Δx2

Differentiate the above expression with respect to position.

role="math" localid="1660045601661" dEdx=ddx28mΔx2+12mω2Δx2dEdx=-228mΔx3+12mkm22ΔxdEdx=-24mΔx3+kΔx

The uncertainty in position in the ground state will be zero so substitutedEdx=0 in the above expression.

0=-24mΔx3+kΔx24mΔx3=kΔxΔx4=24mkΔx=122mk1/4

Substitute the value of uncertainty in position of oscillator in equation (1) to find the uncertainty in momentum of oscillator.

122mk1/4Δp=2Δp=2mk1/4

Therefore, the uncertainty in momentum in the ground state of harmonic oscillator is 2mk1/4.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Whereas an infinite well has an infinite number of bound states, a finite well does not. By relating the well heightU0 to the kinetic energy and the kinetic energy (through λ) to n and L. Show that the number of bound states is given roughly by8ml2U0/h2 (Assume that the number is large.)

The uncertainty in a particle's momentum in an infinite well in the general case of arbitrary nis given bynπhL .

Consider the delta well potential energy:

U(x)={0x0-x=0

Although not completely realistic, this potential energy is often a convenient approximation to a verystrong, verynarrow attractive potential energy well. It has only one allowed bound-state wave function, and because the top of the well is defined as U = 0, the corresponding bound-state energy is negative. Call its value -E0.

(a) Applying the usual arguments and required continuity conditions (need it be smooth?), show that the wave function is given by

ψ(x)=(2mE0h2)1/4e-(2mE0/)|x|

(b) Sketch ψ(x)and U(x) on the same diagram. Does this wave function exhibit the expected behavior in the classically forbidden region?

A finite well always has at least one bound state. Why does the argument of Exercises 38 fail in the case of a finite well?

A 2kg block oscillates with an amplitude of 10cm on a spring of force constant 120 N/m .

(a) In which quantum state is the block?

(b) The block has a slight electric charge and drops to a lower energy level by generating a photon. What is the minimum energy decrease possible, and what would be the corresponding fractional change in energy?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free