Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A finite potential energy function U(x) allows ψ(x) the solution of the time-independent Schrödinger equation. to penetrate the classically forbidden region. Without assuming any particular function for U(x) show that b(x) must have an inflection point at any value of x where it enters a classically forbidden region.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The answer of given problem isψx=Cexp+αxx<0Asin(kL) + Bcos(kL)0xLGexp-αxx>L

Step by step solution

01

Wave function

The wave function ψx

role="math" localid="1660033358067" ψx=Cexp+αxx<0Asin(kL) + Bcos(kL)0xLGexp-αxx>L

02

Step 2:Total energy and potential energy

By definition, the inflection point is a point where the total energy is equal to zero. Total energy E is equal to potential energy Uo

Traditionally authorised and classically banned territories are separated by turning points. A turning point is a point at which the second derivative vanishes.

So, the answer isψx=Cexp+αxx<0Asin(kL) + Bcos(kL)0xLGexp-αxx>L

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The deeper the finite well, the more state it holds. In fact, a new state, the, is added when the well’s depthU0reachesh2(n1)2/8mL2. (a) Argue that this should be the case based only onk=2mE/h2, the shape of the wave inside, and the degree of penetration of the classically forbidden region expected for a state whose energy E is only negligibly belowU0. (b) How many states would be found up to this same “height” in an infinite well.

What is the product of uncertainties determined in Exercise 60 and 61? Explain.

Whereas an infinite well has an infinite number of bound states, a finite well does not. By relating the well heightU0 to the kinetic energy and the kinetic energy (through λ) to n and L. Show that the number of bound states is given roughly by8ml2U0/h2 (Assume that the number is large.)

Determine the particle’s most probable position.

There are mathematical solutions to the Schrödinger equation for the finite well for any energy, and in fact. They can be made smooth everywhere. Guided by A Closer Look: Solving the Finite Well. Show this as follows:

(a) Don't throw out any mathematical solutions. That is in region Il (x<0), assume that (Ce+ax+De-ax), and in region III (x>L), assume thatψ(x)=Fe+ax+Ge-ax. Write the smoothness conditions.

(b) In Section 5.6. the smoothness conditions were combined to eliminate A,Band Gin favor of C. In the remaining equation. Ccanceled. leaving an equation involving only kand α, solvable for only certain values of E. Why can't this be done here?

(c) Our solution is smooth. What is still wrong with it physically?

(d) Show that

localid="1660137122940" D=12(B-kαA)andF=12e-αL[(A-Bkα)sin(kL)+(Akα+B)cos(kL)]

and that setting these offending coefficients to 0 reproduces quantization condition (5-22).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free