Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

What is the probability that a particle in the first excited (n=2) state of an infinite well would be found in the nuddle third of the well? How does this compare with the classical expectation? Why?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The required probability to find the particle in the middle third of the first excited state in the infinite well is 0.196. It is one-third if classically interpreted and the probability is a low value as the specified region is centered on a node.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Probability to be found in the middle third of the well. That is, between a/3and 2a/3as per the Figure 2.

Consider the infinite potential well given below (Figure localid="1657602770659" 1).

localid="1657602788132" V(x)={0, if localid="1657602793033" 0£x£aotherwise

Figure 1: Infinite potential well and width are ‘a’.

Figure 2: First excited state when n=2

02

Formula used

The solutions are given for an infinite well as:

Ψn(x)=2asin(nπax)

For n=2

Ψ2(x)=2asin(2πax)

Then, the probability of finding the particle could be determined from the below formula:

P=|2asin(2πax)|2dx

03

Calculation

P=|2asin(2πax)|2dx

Let 2

Then, apply the limits a/3and 2a/3substitute:

P=2aa/32a/3sin2kxdx

Integrating the right-hand side, and simplifying:

P=2aa/32a/3(1-cos2kx)2dx

P=2aa/32a/3dx2-a/32a/3cos2kx2dx

We can take $1 / 2$ outside and divide the 2 outside curly brackets.

P=1aa/32a/3dx-a/32a/3cos2kxdx

Now integrate and apply upper and lower limits:

sin8π3=sin(480π)=sin(360π+120Ω)=sin(120Z)

P=1a{[x]a/32a/3-[sin2kx2k]a/32a/3}

Now substitute and simplify:

P=1a{[2a3-a3]-[sin4πa×4πa]a/32a/3}

P={13-[sin8π3-sin4π34π]}

Here, Substituting the values and simplifying we will get

P={13-[sin8π3-sin4π34π]}=[13-0.137]=0.196

P=0.196

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Prove that the transitional-state wave function (5.33) does not have a well-defined energy.

For a total energy of 0, the potential energy is given in Exercise 96. (a) Given these, to what region of the x-axis would a classical particle be restricted? Is the quantum-mechanical particle similarly restricted? (b) Write an expression for the probability that the (quantum-mechanical) particle would be found in the classically forbidden region, leaving it in the form of an integral. (The integral cannot be evaluated in closed form.)

Consider a particle of mass mand energy E in a region where the potential energy is constant U0. Greater than E and the region extends tox=+

(a) Guess a physically acceptable solution of the Schrodinger equation in this region and demonstrate that it is solution,

(b) The region noted in part extends from x = + 1 nm to +. To the left of x = 1nm. The particle’s wave function is Dcos (109m-1 x). Is also greater than Ehere?

(c) The particle’s mass m is 10-3 kg. By how much (in eV) doesthe potential energy prevailing from x=1 nm to U0. Exceed the particle’s energy?

To determine the energy quantization condition

It is possible to take the finite well wave functions further than (21) without approximation, eliminating all but one normalization constant C . First, use the continuity/smoothness conditions to eliminate A, B , andG in favor of Cin (21). Then make the change of variables z=x-L/2 and use the trigonometric relations

sin(a+b)=sinacosb+cosasinband

cos(a+b)=cosacosb-sinasinbon the

functions in region I, -L/2<z<L/2. The change of variables shifts the problem so that it is symmetric about z=0, which requires that the probability density be symmetric and thus that ψ(z)be either an odd or even function of z. By comparing the region II and region III functions, argue that this in turn demands that (α/k)sinkL+coskL must be either +1 (even) or -1 (odd). Next, show that these conditions can be expressed, respectively, as αk=tankL2 and αk=-cotkL2. Finally, plug these separately back into the region I solutions and show that

ψ(z)=C×{eα(z+L/2)          z<L/2coskzcoskL2          -L/2<z<L/2e-α(z-L/2)          z>L/2


or

ψ(z)=C×{eα(z+L/2)          z<L/2-sinkzsinkL2          -L/2<z<L/2e-α(z-L/2)          z>L/2

Note that Cis now a standard multiplicative normalization constant. Setting the integral of |ψ(z)|2 over all space to 1 would give it in terms of kand α , but because we can’t solve (22) exactly for k(or E), neither can we obtain an exact value for C.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free