Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Example 9.2 obtains a ratio of the number of particles expected in the \(n=2\) state to that in the ground state. Rather than the \(n=2\) state, consider arbitrary \(n\). (a) Show that the ratio is \(\frac{\text { number of energy } E_{n}}{\text { number of energy } E_{1}}=n^{2} e^{-13.6 \mathrm{cV}\left(1-n^{-2}\right) / k_{\mathrm{B}} T}\) Note that hydrogen atom energies are \(E_{n}=\) \(-13.6 \mathrm{eV} / \mathrm{r}^{2}\) (b) What is the limit of this ratio as \(n\) becomes very large? Can it exceed \(1 ?\) If so, under what condition(s)? (c) In Example 9.2, we found that even at the temperature of the Sun's surface \((\sim 6000 \mathrm{~K})\), the ratio for \(n=2\) is only \(10^{-8}\). For what value of \(n\) would the ratio be \(0.01 ?\) (d) Is it realistic that the number of atoms with high \(n\) could be greater than the number with low \(n\) ?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) The ratio of the number of particles in state \( n \) to the number of particles in the ground state is calculated with \( n^{2} e^{-13.6 (1-n^{-2}) / k_{B} T} \) where \( k_{B} \) is the Boltzmann constant and T is the temperature. b) As \( n \) becomes very large, the ratio will approach 0 and will not exceed 1. c) The value of \( n \) for which the ratio equals \( 0.01 \) can be calculated by using the given formula for \( T = 6000K \). d) The probability of having high \( n \) is less than having low \( n \) because of the exponential decrease.

Step by step solution

01

Evaluate the given formula

The ratio of the number of energy \( E_{n} \) to the number of energy \( E_{1} \) can be evaluated with \( n^{2} e^{-13.6 (1-n^{-2}) / k_{B} T} \), where \( k_{B} \) is the Boltzmann constant and T is the temperature.
02

Find the limit as \( n \) becomes very large

If \( n \) becomes very large, \( n^{-2} \) goes towards 0 and the ratio will approach 0 because the exponential factor goes to 0. This means the ratio couldn't exceed 1.
03

Identify the value of \( n \) when the ratio is 0.01

The value of \( n \) for which the ratio is \( 0.01 \) can be found by solving the given equation for \( n \), when \( T = 6000K \) and the ratio is \( 0.01 \).
04

Discuss if the number of atoms with high \( n \) could be greater than the number with low \( n \)

From the given ratio formula, we can see that as \( n \) increases, \( E_n \) increases, and the exponential term decreases, because the energy increases. This means the probability of having high \( n \) is less than having low \( n \).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Energy Level Ratios
When studying quantum mechanics and specifically the hydrogen atom, one often encounters the scenario of comparing the population of electrons in different energy states. The ratio of the number of particles in an excited state, represented by energy level 'n', to those in the ground state (the first energy level) is an important concept for understanding atomic behavior.

To derive this ratio, we use the formula provided in the exercise: \[\begin{equation}\frac{\text{number of energy } E_{n}}{\text{number of energy } E_{1}} = n^{2} e^{-13.6 \text{eV}(1-n^{-2}) / k_{B} T}\end{equation}\]Where 'n' is the principal quantum number, 'E' represents energy, 'k_{B}' is the Boltzmann constant, and 'T' is the temperature in Kelvin. As 'n' increases, the formula considers the increased probability due to the degeneracy factor ('n^2'), against the declining probability due to the exponential term influenced by the increased energy level and temperature.

Understanding this delicate balance is crucial for predicting electron distribution in quantum systems.
Boltzmann Distribution
The Boltzmann distribution plays a pivotal role in statistical mechanics, describing the distribution of particles over various energy states in thermal equilibrium. It's expressed mathematically as: \[\begin{equation} P(E) = e^{-E / (k_{B} T)}\end{equation}\]Type of writing: Friendly and super simpleWhere 'P(E)' is the probability of finding a particle in a state with energy 'E', 'k_{B}' is Boltzmann's constant, and 'T' is the absolute temperature. The negative exponent indicates that higher energy states are less likely to be populated than lower ones.

In the context of the hydrogen atom, the Boltzmann distribution can be used to explain why, at a given temperature, electrons are more likely to be found in lower energy states than higher ones. The exercise applies the Boltzmann principle to derive the ratio of electron populations between different energy levels of hydrogen, showing the interplay between energy considerations and statistical probabilities.
Hydrogen Atom Quantum States
Quantum states of the hydrogen atom are characterized by several quantum numbers, with the principal quantum number 'n' defining the energy level of the electron. The energy of an electron in a hydrogen atom is inversely proportional to the square of 'n' and can be represented as: \[\begin{equation}E_{n} = -\frac{13.6 \text{eV}}{n^{2}}\end{equation}\]Type of writing: Friendly and super simpleThe negative sign indicates that these energy levels are bound states, meaning the electron is attached to the nucleus. As 'n' increases, the electron moves to higher energy levels, which are further away from the nucleus, and the energy becomes less negative (i.e., closer to zero). This relationship is essential for understanding electron transitions and the emission or absorption of photons which correspond to specific wavelengths of light.
Limit of Quantum State Ratio
Considering the behavior of the ratio between quantum states as 'n' approaches infinity leads to a fundamental insight into quantum mechanics and the limitations of electron excitation. As outlined in the exercise solution, the limit can be expressed as: \[\begin{equation}\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{\text{number of energy } E_{n}}{\text{number of energy } E_{1}}\end{equation}\]Type of writing: Friendly and super simpleFor large values of 'n', the term '-13.6 \text{eV}(1-n^{-2})' trends towards 0, causing the exponential term to approach 1, and since the prefactor 'n^{2}' increases without bound, one might expect the ratio to increase indefinitely. However, due to the properties of the exponential function, the ratio does not exceed 1, showing a physical limit to the population of higher energy states even at very high 'n' values. This illustrates the practical implications of quantum mechanics—while theoretically possible, in reality, higher energy states become increasingly less populated.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Determine the relative probability of a gas molecule being within a small range of speeds around \(2 {\text {rms }}\) to being in the same range of speeds around \(v {_\text {rms }}\).

In a certain design of helium-neon laser, the chamber contaning these gases has a perfect mirror at one end. as usual, but only a window at the other. Beyond the window is a region of free air space and then the second mirror, which is partially reflecting. allowing the beam to exit. The resonant cavity between the mirrors thus has a region free of the helium-neon gas - the "lasing material" - in which you can insert something. If you insert a sheet of clear plastic at any orientation in this region between the mitrors, the laser beam disappears. If the same sheet is placed in the beam ourside the partially reflecting mirror, the beam passes through it, regardless of the orientation. Why?

A scientifically untrained but curious friend asks, "When I walk into a room. is there a chance that all the air will be on the other side?" How do you answer this question?

We claim that the famous exponential decrease of probability with energy is natural, the vastly most probable and disordered state given the constraints on total energy and number of particles. It should be a state of maximum entropy! The proof involves mathematical techniques beyond the scope of the text, but finding support is good exercise and not difficult. Consider a system of 11 oscillators sharing a total energy of just \(5 h \omega_{0}\). In the symbols of Section \(9.3, N=11\) and \(M=5\). (a) Using equation \((9-9),\) calculate the probabilities of \(n\) being \(0.1,2 .\) and \(3 .\) (b) How many particles. \(N_{n}\), would be expected in each level? Round each other nearest integer. (Happily. the number is still 11 . and the energy still \(\operatorname{she}_{0}\) ) What you have is a distribution of the energy that is as close to expectations is possible, given that numbers at each level in a real case are integers. (c) Entropy is related to the number of microscopic ways the macrostate can be obtained. and the number of ways of permuting particle labels with \(N_{0}\). \(N_{1}, N_{2},\) an \(d N_{1}\) fixed and totaling 11 is \(11 ! /\left(N_{0} ! N_{1} !\right.\) \(\left.N_{2} ! N_{3}^{\prime}\right) .\) (See Appendix J for the proof.) Calculate the number of ways for your distribution. (d) Calculate the number of ways if there were 6 particles in \(n=0.5\) in \(n=1\), and none higher. Note that this also has the same total energy. (e) Find at least one other distribution in which the 11 oscillators share the same energy, and calculate the number of ways. (f) What do your findings suggest?

Consider a system of two identical objects heading straight toward each other. What would qualify and whit would disqualify the system as a thermodynamic system, and how, if at all. Would this relate to the elasticity of the collision'?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free