Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Four distinguishable harmonic oscillators \(a, b, c,\) and \(d\) may exchange energy. The energies allowed particle \(a\) are \(E_{a}=n_{d} h \omega_{0} ;\) those allowed particle \(b\) are \(E_{b}=n_{b} h \omega_{0}\) and so \(\mathrm{cm}\). Consider an overall state (macrustate) in which the total energy is \(3 \hbar \omega_{0}\). One possible microstate would have particles \(\alpha\) b. and \(c\) ' in their \(n=0\) states and particle \(d\) in its \(n=3\) state: that is, \(\left(n_{u}, n_{b}, n_{c}, n_{d}\right)=(0,0,0,3)\) (a) List all possible microstates. (b) What is the probability that a given particle will be in its \(n=0\) state? (c) Answer par (b) for all other possible values of \(n\). (d) Plot the probability versus \(n\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The possible microstates are: (0,0,0,3), (0,0,1,2), (0,0,2,1), (0,0,3,0), (0,1,0,2), (0,1,1,1), (0,1,2,0), (0,2,0,1), (0,2,1,0), (0,3,0,0), (1,0,0,2), (1,0,1,1), (1,0,2,0), (1,1,0,1), (1,1,1,0), (1,2,0,0), (2,0,0,1), (2,0,1,0), (2,1,0,0), (3,0,0,0). The probabilities that a given oscillator is in the \(n=0, 1, 2, 3\) states are, respectively, 0.95, 0.30, 0.15, and 0.05.

Step by step solution

01

Determine all possible microstates

The possible microstates can be determined by considering all the possible ways that three quanta can be distributed among the four oscillators. The microstates are: \((n_{a}, n_{b}, n_{c}, n_{d}) = (0,0,0,3), (0,0,1,2), (0,0,2,1), (0,0,3,0), (0,1,0,2), (0,1,1,1), (0,1,2,0), (0,2,0,1), (0,2,1,0), (0,3,0,0), (1,0,0,2), (1,0,1,1), (1,0,2,0), (1,1,0,1), (1,1,1,0), (1,2,0,0), (2,0,0,1), (2,0,1,0), (2,1,0,0), (3,0,0,0)\)
02

Count how many microstates have an oscillator in its \(n=0\) state

A given oscillator is in the \(n=0\) state in all microstates except (3, 0, 0, 0). Only one microstate (3, 0, 0, 0) doesn't have any oscillator in the \(n=0\) state. Therefore, the total number of microstates with a given oscillator in the \(n=0\) state is 19 out of 20. Hence, the probability that a given particle will be in its \(n=0\) state is \(19/20 = 0.95). This probability is the same for each oscillator, as they are identical and indistinguishable.
03

Calculate the probabilities for all other possible states

The oscillator can be in states \(n=1, 2, 3\). The number of microstates with the oscillator in the \(n=1\) state is 6, for \(n=2\) is 3, and for \(n=3\) is 1. Hence, the probabilities are, respectively, 6/20 = 0.30, 3/20 = 0.15, and 1/20 = 0.05.
04

Plot the probability versus \(n\)

The x-axis represents the states of the oscillator, and the y-axis represents the probability that the oscillator is in that state. A bar graph can be drawn with bars at \(n=0, 1, 2, 3\) and the heights of the bars are the probabilities calculated in step 3, which are, respectively, 0.95, 0.30, 0.15, and 0.05.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Microstates and Macrostates
Understanding the concepts of microstates and macrostates is foundational in the study of quantum mechanics and statistical physics. In the context of quantum harmonic oscillators, like in our exercise involving particles a, b, c, and d, a macrostate refers to the overall condition of a system—such as its total energy—without concern for how that condition is achieved. For example, our exercise defines a macrostate with total energy of 3ħω_0.

A microstate, on the other hand, details the specific arrangement of the system's components that results in the macrostate. Each microstate is a unique configuration of particles and their respective quantum states. In our exercise, one example is (n_a, n_b, n_c, n_d) = (0,0,0,3), which is one of many ways to achieve the total energy macrostate. By listing all the possible microstates, we capture all the configurations consistent with the macrostate's constraints.

The concept of microstates becomes especially powerful when combined with the principles of statistical mechanics. For systems with a large number of particles, the number of microstates associated with a particular macrostate can be astronomically large. The probability of the system being in any one microstate is typically the same for each microstate (assuming equally probable states) and understanding the distribution of microstates gives us deep insights into the system's thermodynamic behavior and properties.
Quantum Mechanics Probability
The role of probability in quantum mechanics is to indicate the likelihood of a quantum system, like our set of harmonic oscillators, being found in a particular state. In this discipline, probabilities are not just a convenient tool for handling uncertainty, they are a fundamental aspect of the physical theories themselves.

For instance, when we calculate the likelihood of an oscillator being in its n=0 state, as shown in the exercise, we are making use of quantum mechanics probability to predict the expected behavior of the system under certain conditions. According to the results of our calculation, finding a given particle in the n=0 state has a probability of 0.95, which is intuitively high given that there are 19 microstates out of 20 possible ones where at least one oscillator is in that state.

The exercise we've analyzed demonstrates how probabilities can change significantly for different states of a quantum system. This understanding is imperative for interpreting experimental results and predicting system dynamics, as every measurable quantity in quantum mechanics is ultimately associated with a probability distribution.
Energy Distribution Among Oscillators
The concept of energy distribution among oscillators relates to the way energy is allocated between different parts of a quantum system. In a quantum harmonic oscillator, energy levels are quantized, meaning oscillators can only possess specific discrete amounts of energy.

In our exercise, the task of distributing a total energy of 3ħω_0 among four distinguishable oscillators showcases this energy quantization. Each configuration reflects a different distribution of energy and is represented by a unique microstate. The probabilities calculated for each quantum state — for n=0, 1, 2, and 3 — directly depict this energy distribution. As one can see, most energy configurations favor lower energy states, such as n=0, a tendency described by the Boltzmann distribution in statistical mechanics.

The distribution tells us a lot about the system's properties: lower energy states are more likely to be occupied than higher energy states in a quantum harmonic oscillator. This knowledge is essential in many areas of physics, including understanding molecular vibrations, quantum optics, and even black body radiation. Because of the fundamental role energy plays in these systems, energy distribution is a topic that's crucial for students to grasp thoroughly.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Determine the density of states \(D(E)\) for a \(2 D\) infinite well (ignoring spin) in which $$ E_{A_{x+} n_{2}}=\left(n_{x}^{2}+n_{y}^{2}\right) \frac{\pi^{2} \hbar^{2}}{2 m L^{2}} $$

The Stirling approximation. \(J ! \equiv \sqrt{2 \pi} J^{j+1 / 2} e^{-\jmath}\). is very handy when dealing with numbers larger than about 100 . Consider the following ratio: the number of ways \(N\) particles can be evenly divided between two halves of a room to the number of ways they can be divided with \(60 \%\) on the right and \(40 \%\) on the left. (a) Show, using the Stirling approximation, that the ratio is approximately \(\left(4^{04} 6^{06} / 5\right)^{N}\) for large \(N\). (b) Explain how this fits with the claim that average behaviors become more predictable in large systems,

Somehow you have a two-dimensional solid. a sheet of atoms in a square lattice, each atom linked to its four closest neighbors by four springs oriented along the two perpendicular axes. (a) What would you expect the molar heat capacity to be at very low temperature and at very thigh temperature? (b) What quantity would determine, roughly, the line between low and high?

The fact that a laser's resonant cavity so effectively sharpens the wavelength can lead to the output of several closely spaced laser wavelengths, called longitudinal modes. Here we see how. Suppose the spontaneous emission serving as the seed for stimulated emission is of wavelength \(633 \mathrm{~nm}\), but somewhat fuzzy, with a line width of roughly \(0.001 \mathrm{~nm}\) either side of the central value. The resonant cavity is exactly \(60 \mathrm{~cm}\) kng. (a) How many wavelengths fit the standing-wave condition? (b) If only u single wavelength were desired. would changing the length of the cavity help? Explain.

We claim that the famous exponential decrease of probability with energy is natural, the vastly most probable and disordered state given the constraints on total energy and number of particles. It should be a state of maximum entropy! The proof involves mathematical techniques beyond the scope of the text, but finding support is good exercise and not difficult. Consider a system of 11 oscillators sharing a total energy of just \(5 h \omega_{0}\). In the symbols of Section \(9.3, N=11\) and \(M=5\). (a) Using equation \((9-9),\) calculate the probabilities of \(n\) being \(0.1,2 .\) and \(3 .\) (b) How many particles. \(N_{n}\), would be expected in each level? Round each other nearest integer. (Happily. the number is still 11 . and the energy still \(\operatorname{she}_{0}\) ) What you have is a distribution of the energy that is as close to expectations is possible, given that numbers at each level in a real case are integers. (c) Entropy is related to the number of microscopic ways the macrostate can be obtained. and the number of ways of permuting particle labels with \(N_{0}\). \(N_{1}, N_{2},\) an \(d N_{1}\) fixed and totaling 11 is \(11 ! /\left(N_{0} ! N_{1} !\right.\) \(\left.N_{2} ! N_{3}^{\prime}\right) .\) (See Appendix J for the proof.) Calculate the number of ways for your distribution. (d) Calculate the number of ways if there were 6 particles in \(n=0.5\) in \(n=1\), and none higher. Note that this also has the same total energy. (e) Find at least one other distribution in which the 11 oscillators share the same energy, and calculate the number of ways. (f) What do your findings suggest?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free