Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider a system of two identical objects heading straight toward each other. What would qualify and whit would disqualify the system as a thermodynamic system, and how, if at all. Would this relate to the elasticity of the collision'?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Whether the system of two objects heading towards each other qualifies as a thermodynamic system depends on the nature of the objects and collision. If the objects consist of many particles and the average behavior can be described using thermodynamic principles, it could qualify as a thermodynamic system. If the collision is elastic and no energy is dissipated as heat, there might not be a thermodynamic 'work' done in such a system, potentially disqualifying it as a thermodynamic system.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Concept of Thermodynamic System

A thermodynamic system is a region of space, separated from the rest of the universe by a boundary, in which energy exchanges in the form of heat and work occur according to the laws of thermodynamics. Generally, such systems involve a large number of particles and the average behavior is considered.
02

Analyze the Given Scenario

The given scenario involves two objects heading towards each other. This could be a thermodynamic system if the objects are made up of a large number of particles and the overall behavior of the system, including energy exchanges, can be described using thermodynamic principles. However, this scenario could technically involve only two particles, which would not typically qualify as a thermodynamic system as the statistical nature of thermodynamics cannot be applied.
03

Discuss the Elasticity of the Collision

The elasticity of the collision refers to whether kinetic energy is conserved in the collision. In a perfectly elastic collision, both momentum and kinetic energy are conserved. In an inelastic collision, momentum is conserved but kinetic energy is not - some is transferred into other forms, such as heat. If the collision of the two objects is elastic, this could have implications for whether the system qualifies as a thermodynamic system. For example, in an elastic collision, no energy is dissipated as heat, hence there might not be any thermodynamic 'work' done in such a system.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Thermodynamics
When learning about thermodynamics, consider it as the branch of physics that deals with the relationships between heat and other forms of energy. In essence, it's all about energy transfer within a system and its effects. A thermodynamic system typically encompasses a large number of particles, which makes statistical approaches necessary for understanding its behavior.

In the context of two objects colliding, the system could be deemed thermodynamic if it includes numerous particles and if it allows for the study of energy transfers as heat and work. The importance lies not in the simple collision but in the complex interactions and energy exchanges that occur on a particle level within the macroscopic objects. If the objects do not meet these criteria, saying they form a thermodynamic system could be less meaningful. To fully grasp these concepts, consider exploring exercises that involve heat transfer, energy conservation, and work, as they are key to thermodynamics.
Elasticity of Collision
The elasticity of a collision is a concept that measures how the kinetic energy of objects is affected during their interaction. In a perfectly elastic collision, objects bounce off one another without any loss of kinetic energy. On the contrary, in an inelastic collision, some kinetic energy is transformed into other energy forms, such as heat or sound.

To illustrate, imagine a pair of bouncy balls colliding. If they bounce off each other and retain their speeds reflecting a perfectly elastic collision, no thermodynamic 'work' is done, as there's no energy transferred as heat. But consider the same collision with putty balls that stick together; this inelastic collision transforms kinetic energy into internal energy. By including examples of both elastic and inelastic collisions in studies, students can better understand the conservation of energy and momentum and how these principles apply within thermodynamic systems.
Energy Conservation
The principle of energy conservation is fundamental in both physics and thermodynamics. It states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed from one form to another. This law underpins all thermodynamic processes and governs the behavior of systems during collisions.

In the case of the two colliding objects, the scenario could be used to illustrate energy conservation. Provided that no external forces act upon them, the total kinetic energy and momentum of the system remain constant before and after the collision. In your studies, focus on exercises where you account for all forms of energy before and after a process. Investigate scenarios with heat transfer, potential energy changes, and work done by external forces to understand how the principle of energy conservation applies in various contexts.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Equation \((9-27)\) gives the density of states for a system of oscillators but ignores spin. The result, simply one state per energy change of \(\hbar \omega_{0}\) between levels. is incorrect if particles are allowed diff erent spin states at each level. but modification to include spin is easy. From Chapter 8 , we know that a particle of spin s is allowed \(2 s+1\) spin orientations, so the number of states at each level is simply multiplied by this factor. Thus, $$ D(E)=(2 s+1) / \hbar \omega_{0} $$ (a) Using this density of states, the definition $$ \begin{array}{l} \text { Nheud }(2 s+1)=\delta, \text { and } \\ \qquad N=\int_{0}^{\infty} \mathcal{N}(E) D(E) d E \end{array} $$ calculate the parameter \(B\) in the Boltzmann distribution \((9-31)\) and show that the distribution can thus be tewritten as $$ \mathcal{N}(E)_{\text {Bolu }}=\frac{\varepsilon}{k_{\mathrm{B}} T} \frac{1}{e^{E / \mathrm{L}_{\mathrm{B}} T}} $$ (b) Algue that if \(k_{\mathrm{B}} T \gg \delta\), the occupation number is much less than I for all \(E\).

At what wavelength does the human body emit the maximum electromagnetic radiation? Use Wien's law from Exercise 79 and assume a skin temperature of \(70^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\)

A block has a cavity inside, occupied by a photon gas. Briefly explain what the characteristics of this gas should have to do with the temperature of the block.

Pruve that fur any sine function \(\sin (k x+\phi)\) of wavelength shonter than \(2 a\), where \(a\) is the atomic spacing. there is a sine function with a wavelength longer than \(2 a\) that has the same values at the points \(x=a .20,3 a\). and so on. Wotr: It is probably easier to work with wave number than with wavelength. We seck to show that for every wave number greater than \(\pi / a\) there is an equivalent une less than \(\pi / a\).)

When a star has nearly bumed up its intemal fuel, it may become a white dwarf. It is crushed under its own enonnous gravitational forces to the point at which the exclusion principle for the electrons becomes a factor. A smaller size would decrease the gravitational potential energy, but assuming the electrons to be packed into the lowest energy states consistent with the exclusion principle. "squeezing" the potential well necessarily increases the ener gies of all the electrons (by shortening their wavelengths). If gravitation and the electron exclusion principle are the only factors, there is a mini. mum total energy and corresponding equilibrium radius. (a) Treat the electrons in a white dwarf as a quantum gas. The minimum energy allowed by the exclusion principle (see Exercise 67 ) is $$ U_{\text {elecimns }}=\frac{3}{10}\left(\frac{3 \pi^{2} \hbar^{3}}{m_{e}^{3 / 2} V}\right)^{2 / 3} N^{5 / 3} $$ Note that as the volume \(V\) is decreased, the energy does increase. For a neutral star. the number of electrons, \(N\), equals the number of protons. Assuming that protons account for half of the white dwarf's mass \(M\) (neutrons accounting for the other half). show that the minimum electron energy may be written $$ U_{\text {electrons }}=\frac{9 \hbar^{2}}{80 m_{e}}\left(\frac{3 \pi^{2} M^{5}}{m_{\mathrm{p}}^{5}}\right)^{1 / 3} \frac{1}{R^{2}} $$ where \(R\) is the star's radius. (b) The gravitational potential energy of a sphere of mass \(M\) and radius \(R\) is given by $$ U_{\operatorname{mav}}=-\frac{3}{5} \frac{G M^{2}}{R} $$ Taking both factors into account, show that the minimum total energy occurs when $$ R=\frac{3 h^{2}}{8 G}\left(\frac{3 \pi^{2}}{m^{3} m_{p}^{5} M}\right)^{1 / 3} $$ (c) Evaluate this radius for a star whose mass is equal to that of our Sun, \(\sim 2 \times 10^{30} \mathrm{~kg}\). (d) White dwarfs are comparable to the size of Eath. Does the value in part (c) agree?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free