Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The general form for symmetric and antisymmetric wave functions is \(\psi_{n}\left(x_{1}\right) \psi_{n}\left(x_{2}\right) \pm \psi_{n} \cdot\left(x_{1}\right) \psi_{n}\left(x_{2}\right)\) but it is not nornalized. (a) In applying quantum mechanics, we usually deal with quantum states that are "orthonormal." That is, if we integrate over all space the square of any individual-particle function, such as \(\psi_{n}^{*}(x) \psi_{n}(x)\) or \(\psi_{i}^{\circ}(x) \psi_{n}(x),\) we get \(1,\) but for the product of different individual-particle functions, such as \(\psi_{n}^{\circ}(x) \psi_{u}(x)\), we get 0 . This happens to be true for all the systems in which we have obtained or tabulated sets of wave functions (e.g., the particle in a box, the harmonic oscillator, and the hydrogen atom). Assuming that this holds, what multiplicative constant would normalize the symmetric and antisymmetric functions? (b) What value \(A\) gives the vector \(\mathbf{V}=A(\hat{\mathbf{x}} \pm \hat{\mathbf{y}})\) unit length? (c) Discuss the relationship between your answers in (a) and (b).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The multiplicative constant that will normalize the symmetric and antisymmetric functions is \(1 / \sqrt{2}\). For the vector V, the value of A that provides a unit length is also \(1 / \sqrt{2}\). The answers to both (a) and (b) are equivalent, illustrating the universal application of normalization procedures in different contexts.

Step by step solution

01

Normalization of Symmetric and Antisymmetric Functions

In terms of the antisymmetric function, let's normalize \(\psi_{n}(x_{1})\psi_{n}(x_{2}) - \psi_{n}(x_{2})\psi_{n}(x_{1})\) to find the required constant. Observe that the normalization condition for these functions involves a double integral over all space, which should equal 1. Solve the integral \( \int \int (\psi_{n}(x_{1})\psi_{n}(x_{2}) - \psi_{n}(x_{2})\psi_{n}(x_{1}))^{2} dx_{1} dx_{2} = 1 \) . This simplifies to \( 2(\int \psi_{n}(x_{1})^{2} dx_{1})^{2} = 1 \) by using the fact that \(\int \psi_{n}(x)^{2} dx = 1\) . Hence, the multiplicative constant would be \( 1/\sqrt{2} \) . For the symmetric function, repeat the same steps but with a positive sign. The result will be the same since the squared functions are the same for both symmetric and antisymmetric cases.
02

Determination of Normalization Factor for Vector V

Vector V has unit length, which implies that \( A^{2}(x^{2} + y^{2} + 2x*y) = 1 \), assuming that the vector components are normalized to 1. Considering that both vector components are normalized and orthonormal to each other, this simplifies to \( A^{2} * (1 + 1) = 1 \). Solving results in \( A = 1/\sqrt{2} \)
03

Comparing Results

The normalization constants found for both the wave functions and vector V are equivalent, being \( 1/\sqrt{2} \). This shows a similarity in the process of normalizing objects, be they quantum states or mathematical vectors, which underlines the universality of this mathematical procedure

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Wave Functions
In quantum mechanics, wave functions are essential to describe the quantum state of a particle or a system. The wave function, typically represented by \( \psi(x) \), provides a complete description of probabilities associated with the position and other properties of a particle.
- **Probabilistic Nature**: The absolute square of a wave function, \(|\psi(x)|^2\), represents the probability density of finding a particle at a specific position. Therefore, it is crucial that wave functions are properly normalized so that the total probability sums to one.
- **Types of Wave Functions**: In the context of this exercise, symmetric and antisymmetric wave functions play a vital role.
- **Symmetric Wave Functions**: These wave functions remain unchanged when particles are swapped. They are of the form \( \psi_{n}(x_1) \psi_{n}(x_2) + \psi_{n}(x_2) \psi_{n}(x_1) \).
- **Antisymmetric Wave Functions**: These wave functions change sign when the positions of particles are swapped. Such functions are expressed as \( \psi_{n}(x_1) \psi_{n}(x_2) - \psi_{n}(x_2) \psi_{n}(x_1) \). Antisymmetric wave functions are particularly significant for describing fermions, such as electrons.
Normalization
Normalization is an important process in quantum mechanics that ensures a wave function correctly represents the physical state it describes.
- **Purpose of Normalization**: By normalizing a wave function, we make sure that probabilities calculated from the function are accurate and meaningful. This involves adjusting the wave function so that the integral of its square equals one: \( \int |\psi(x)|^2 \, dx = 1 \).
- **Normalization Constant**: For symmetric and antisymmetric wave functions, the normalization constant is found by solving integrals over all space. - For symmetric or antisymmetric wave functions described in the exercise, the normalizing constant is \( 1/\sqrt{2} \). This ensures the double integral of the squared function equals one.
- **Implications of Normalization**: Once normalized, the wave functions can be used to calculate probabilities, expectation values, and other physical quantities accurately.
The process of normalization is not unique to quantum wave functions. As seen with the vector in the exercise, vectors also require a similar normalization approach to become unit vectors.
Quantum States
Quantum states are a cornerstone concept in quantum mechanics, representing the state of a system that encompasses all its properties.
- **Defining Quantum States**: A quantum state provides a full description of a quantum system's properties. These states can be represented by wave functions.
- **Orthogonality and Orthonormality**: In many quantum systems, states are chosen to be orthogonal and normalized (orthonormal).
- **Orthogonal States**: Two states are orthogonal if the integral of their product across all space equals zero. This means they do not overlap in terms of probability distribution.
- **Orthonormal States**: These states are both orthogonal and normalized, meaning their overlap is zero and their individual probability integrals equal one.
- **Superposition and Entanglement**: Quantum states can exist as a superposition of multiple states, contributing to unique phenomena such as quantum entanglement and interference. Understanding quantum states and how they are represented is vital for dealing with complex quantum systems, allowing us to predict and analyze physical outcomes effectively.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show that unless \(\ell=s . L\) and \(S\) cannot be exactly opposite: that is, show that at its minimum possible value, for which \(j=\ell-s\), the magnitude \(J\) of the total angular momenturn is strictly greater than the difference \(L-S \mid\) berween the magnitudes of the orbital and intrinsic angular momentum vectors.

Exercise 44 gives an antisymmetric multiparticle state for two particles in a box with opposite spins. Another antisymmetric state with spins opposite and the same quantum numbers is $$ \psi_{n}\left(x_{1}\right) \downarrow \psi_{n}\left(x_{2}\right) \uparrow-\psi_{n}\left(x_{1}\right) \uparrow \psi_{n}\left(x_{2}\right) \downarrow $$ Refer to these states as \(\mid\) and 11 . We have tended to characterize exchange symmetry as to whether the state's sign changes when we swap particle labels. but we could achieve the same result by instead swapping the particles' stares, specifically the \(n\) and \(n^{\prime}\) in equation \((8-22)\). In this exercise. we look at swapping only parts of the state-spatial or spin. (a) What is the exchange symmeiry - symmetric (unchanged). antisymmetric (switching sign), or neither-of multiparticle states 1 and \(\mathrm{II}\) with respect to swapping spatial states alone? (b) Answer the same question. but with respect to swapping spin states/arrows alone. (c) Show that the algebraic sum of states 1 and \(\mathrm{II}\) may be written \(\left(\psi_{n}\left(x_{1}\right) \psi_{n}\left(x_{2}\right)-\psi_{n}\left(x_{1}\right) \psi_{n}\left(x_{2}\right)\right)(\downarrow T+\uparrow \downarrow)\) where the left arrow in any couple represents the spin of particle 1 and the right arrow that of particle 2 (d) Answer the same questions as in parts \((a)\) and (b). but for this algebraic sum. (e) Is the sum of states I and 11 still antis ymmetric if we swap the particles? total-spatial plus spin -states? (f) If the two particles repel each other, would any of the three multiparticle states - l. II, and the sum - be preferred? Explain.

Does circulating charge require both an gular momentum and magnetic moment? Consider positive and neg. ative charges simultaneously circulating and countercirculating.

A Simple Model: The multielectron atom is unsolvable, but simple models go a long way. Section 7.8 gives energies and orbit radii forone- electron/hydrogenlike atoms. Let us see how useful these are by considering lithium. (a) Treat one of lithium's \(n=1\) electrons as a single clectron in a one- electron atom of \(Z=3\). Find the energy and orbit radius. (b) The other \(n=1\) electron. being in the same spatial state. must have the same energy and radius, but we must account forthe repulsion between these electrons. Assuming they are roughly one orbit diameter apar, what repulsive energy would they share, and if each claims half this energy. what would be the energies of these two electrons? (c) Approximately what charge does lithium's lone valence electron orbit, and what radius and energy would it have? (d) Is i reasonable to dismiss the role of then \(=\) I electrons in chemical reactions? (e) The actual energies of lithium's electrons are about \(-98 \mathrm{eV}\) (twice, of course) and \(-5.4 \mathrm{eV}\). How good is the model? (f) Why should the model's prediction for the valence electron's energy differ in the direction it does from the actual value?

Slater Determinant: A convenient and compact way of expressing multiparticle states of antisymmetric character for many fermions is the Slater determinant. lt is based on the fact that for \(N\) fermions there must be \(N\) different individual-particle states, or sets of quantum numbers. The ith state has sparial quantum numbers (which might be \(n_{i}, \ell_{i},\) and \(m_{c i}\) ) represented simply by \(n_{t}\) and spin quanturn number \(m_{s i^{i}}\). Were it occupied by the ith particle, the state would be \(\psi_{n}\left(x_{j}\right) m_{s i}\). A column corresponds to a given state and a row to a given particle. For instance, the first column corresponds to individualparticle state \(\psi_{n}(x,) m_{3},\) where \(j\) progresses (through the rows) from particle 1 to particle \(N\). The first row corresponds to particle I. which successively occupies all individual-particle states (progressing through the columns). (a) What property of determinants ensures that the multiparticle state is 0 if any two individualparticle states are identical? (b) What property of deterninants ensures that switching the labels on any two particles switches the sign of the multiparticle state?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free