Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Equation \((5-16)\) gives infinite well energies. Because equation \((5-22)\) cannot be solved in closed form, there is no similar compact formula for finite well energies. Still, many conclusions can be drawn without one. Argue on largely qualitative grounds that if the walls of a finite well are moved closer together but not changed in height, then the well must progressively hold fewer bound states. (Make a clear connection between the width of the well and the height of the walls.)

Short Answer

Expert verified
In a quantum well, bound states correspond to the energy levels that lie below the energy at the boundaries of the well. If the width of the finite well is decreased without changing the well depth, the available 'space' for the particle to 'fit' within the well's potential energy is reduced, leading to fewer potential energy levels and hence fewer bound states.

Step by step solution

01

Explanation of Bound States

In quantum mechanics, a particle is in a bound state if its energy is less than the potential energy at the boundaries. In this context, the potential energy at the boundaries is defined by the depth (or height) of the well and the boundaries themselves — the width of the well.
02

Correlation between Well Width and Bound States

When the width of the well is decreased (i.e., the walls are moved closer together), the 'space' within the potential energy of the well for the particle to 'fit' is reduced. This phenomenon results in a decreased number of potential energy levels below the energy of the well itself.
03

Linking Width to Number of Bound States

As a consequence of the reduction in well width detailed in Step 2, there will be fewer energy states below the height of the well's walls that a particle can occupy. Thus fewer bound states are available to a particle.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Bound States
Bound states in quantum mechanics refer to the condition where a particle is confined to a particular region in space because its energy is lower than the potential energy outside this region. Think of a marble in a bowl. The marble cannot escape unless it accumulates enough energy to get over the edge of the bowl. Similarly, in a quantum system, a particle is "trapped" in a region if its energy is less than the potential barriers surrounding it.
  • Bound states are crucial in determining how particles behave in quantum systems.
  • They only exist when the particle’s energy is insufficient to overcome the potential barrier, confining the particle within the boundary.
  • The particle's wavefunction tends to diminish outside these boundaries, suggesting confinement.
Understanding bound states is key to solving many quantum mechanical problems, as it defines conditions where particles remain within finite regions.
Finite Potential Well
A finite potential well is a simplified model used in quantum mechanics to understand the behavior of particles within confined boundaries. Unlike an infinite well, where walls are impenetrable, a finite potential well has boundaries that particles can, in theory, penetrate if they possess sufficient energy.
When analyzing a finite potential well, the energy levels are not predefined as in an infinite well. Instead:
  • Particles have a probability of existing both inside and slightly outside the well, thanks to tunneling effects inherent to quantum systems.
  • The depth and width of the well determine the potential energy landscape and possible bound states that can exist.
  • Calculating exact energy levels can be complex, often relying on numerical methods due to the absence of simple formulas unlike the infinite well scenario.
This concept acts as a building block for understanding more advanced quantum mechanical systems and applications.
Energy Levels
Energy levels within quantum mechanical systems are discrete values of energy that particles can occupy. These levels arise because of the boundary conditions imposed by the system, such as the confines of a finite potential well.
  • The separation of these energy levels is influenced by the size and shape of the confining potential well.
  • As well width decreases, energy differences between levels typically increase, indicating fewer available states.
  • Calculated using wavefunctions, these energy levels provide insight into where and how particles might be found within a system.
This discreteness in energy levels is a hallmark of quantum mechanics, signifying that unlike classical systems, particles cannot possess arbitrary energies.
Particle in a Box
The 'particle in a box' model is one of the most fundamental problems tackled in quantum mechanics. It illustrates how quantum levels arise through confinement.
  • In an infinite potential well, or 'box,' a particle is confined completely, unable to penetrate the walls, leading to quantized energy levels derived from simple formulas.
  • The finite potential well version adds complexity, permitting the particle to have a non-zero probability of being outside, a feature not present in the infinite model.
  • By adjusting the width of this "box," one can observe changes in the spacing and number of energy levels, echoing the fundamental principle that spatial confinement directly affects quantum behavior.
Understanding these models is crucial for comprehending quantum mechanical systems and interpreting the behavior of particles under different conditions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Exercises \(90-92\) refer to a particle described by the wave function $$ \psi(x)=\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}} a^{3 / 2} \frac{1}{x^{2}+a^{2}} $$ Calculate the uncertainty in the particle's position.

In Section \(5.5\). it was shown that the infinite well coergis follow simply from \(\Lambda=h / p\), the fornulafor kinelic encrgy. \(p^{2} / 2 m\); and a famous standing-wave condition \(\lambda=2 U_{n} .\) The arguments are perfectly valid when the potential energy is 0 (inside the well) and \(L\) is strictly conskant, but they can also be useful in other cases. The length \(L\) allowed the wave should be roughly the distance between the classical tuming points, where there is no kinetic eneigy left. Apply these arguments to the oscillator potential energy, \(U(x)=\frac{1}{2} \kappa x^{2}\). Find the location \(x\) of the classical tuming point in terms of \(E\); use nwice this distance for L: then insert this into the infinite well eneigy fonnula so that \(E\) appears on both sides. Thus far, the procedure Ieally only deals with kinctic energy. Assume, as is tue for a classical oscillator, that there is as much potential eneigy, on average, as kinetic energy. What do you obtain for the quantized energies?

Under what circumstance does the integral \(\int_{x_{0}}^{\infty} x^{b} d x\) diverge? Use this to argue that a physically acceptable wave function must fall to 0 faster than \(|x|^{-1} / 2\) does as \(x\) gets large.

In Section \(5.3\), we leamed that to be normaliable, a wave function (1) must not itself diverge and \((2)\) must fall to 0 faster than \(|\mathrm{r}|^{-1 / 2}\) as \(x\) gets lar ge. Nevertheless, we find two functions that slightly violate these requirements very useful. Consider the quantum mechanical plane wave Aelue-aul and the weird function \(\psi_{x_{1}}(x)\) pictured in Figure \(5.19\). which we here call by its preper name, the Direc delta function. (a) Which of the iwo normalizability requirements is violated by the plane wave, and which by the Dirac delta function? (b) Nomalization of the plane Wave could be accomplished if it were simply truncated, restricted to the rejion \(-b

Write out the total wave function \(\Psi(x, t)\) for an electron in the \(n=3\) state of a \(10 \mathrm{nm}\) wide infinite well. Other than the symbols \(x\) and \(t,\) the function should include only numerical values.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free