Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In an assembly of fissionable material, the larger the sur. face area per fissioning nucleus (i.e., per unit volume), the more likely is the escape of valuable neutrons. (a) What is the surface-to-volume ratio of a sphere of radius \(r_{0} ?\) (b) What is the surf ace-to-volume ratio of a cube of the same volume? (c) What is the surface-to. volume ratio of a sphere of twice the volume?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The surface to volume ratio for: (a) a sphere of radius \(r_{0}\) is \(\frac{3}{r_{0}}\) ; (b) a cube of equivalent volume is \(\frac{6}{\sqrt[3]{\frac{4}{3}\pi r_{0}^{3}}}\) ; and (c) a sphere of twice the volume is \(\frac{3}{r_{0}\sqrt[3]{2}}\).

Step by step solution

01

Calculate Surface-to-Volume Ratio for a Sphere

For a sphere of radius \(r_{0}\), the surface area \(A\) is given by the formula \(A = 4\pi r_{0}^{2}\), and the volume \(V\) is given by the formula \(V = \frac{4}{3}\pi r_{0}^{3}\). The surface-to-volume (S/V) ratio is obtained by dividing the surface area by the volume. So, for a sphere, \(S/V = \frac{4\pi r_{0}^{2}}{\frac{4}{3}\pi r_{0}^{3}} = \frac{3}{r_{0}}\).
02

Calculate Surface-to-Volume Ratio for a Cube

Assuming that the cube has the same volume as the sphere, the side length of the cube \(a\) can be obtained by finding the cube root of the sphere's volume, i.e., \(a = \sqrt[3]{\frac{4}{3}\pi r_{0}^{3}}\). The surface area of the cube \(A\) is given by \(A = 6a^{2}\) and the volume \(V\) of the cube is \(a^{3}\). The surface-to-volume ratio of the cube is then given by \(S/V = \frac{6a^{2}}{a^{3}} = \frac{6}{a}\). Substituting \(a\) from above, \(S/V_{cube} = \frac{6}{\sqrt[3]{\frac{4}{3}\pi r_{0}^{3}}}\).
03

Calculate Surface-to-Volume Ratio for a Sphere of Twice the Volume

For a sphere of twice the volume, the new radius \(r_{1}\) can be found using the formula for the volume of a sphere, \(V = \frac{8}{3}\pi r_{1}^{3}\). Solving for \(r_{1}\), we have \(r_{1} = r_{0}\sqrt[3]{2}\). The surface-to-volume ratio for this larger sphere would then be \(S/V = \frac{3}{r_{1}} = \frac{3}{r_{0}\sqrt[3]{2}}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Nuclear Fission Material
Understanding the importance of surface-to-volume ratio in the context of nuclear fission materials is crucial to grasping the fundamentals of nuclear physics. In nuclear reactions, specifically fission, the aim is to split the nuclei of atoms to release energy. However, the efficiency of this process can be affected by how easily neutrons, which facilitate the reaction, can escape the material.

When dealing with fissionable material, such as uranium or plutonium, a high surface area relative to the volume is advantageous because it increases the likelihood of neutron emission into the surrounding environment, rather than being captured back into the material. This behavior is paramount in reactor design and understanding the geometric considerations of the fuel's shape, whether it's in the form of rods, spheres, or pellets.
Geometry in Physics
Geometry plays a vital role in various physical processes, and in the case of nuclear materials, the geometry determines how substances interact with each other. In our example, comparing different shapes and their surface-to-volume ratios illustrates this concept perfectly.

A sphere, with its symmetrical properties, offers a unique S/V ratio that is distinct compared to other shapes like a cube. These geometric comparisons not only serve as mathematical exercises but also provide valuable insights for applications in science and engineering, such as maximizing the efficiency of reactions in nuclear reactors.
Mathematical Problem-Solving
The step-by-step solutions to these problems exemplify mathematical problem-solving in physics. Firstly, by using the formulae for the surface area and volume of a sphere, we can establish the S/V ratio for a sphere of a given radius. Moreover, using cube roots and algebraic manipulation, we extend this approach to compare a cube of the same volume and a sphere with twice the volume.

These exercises not only test one's ability to perform algebraic calculations but also reinforce understanding of three-dimensional geometry and its application in the real world. An essential takeaway for students is the link between mathematical problem-solving and practical applications, specifically in scientific contexts like nuclear physics, where precise calculations lead to a greater understanding and optimization of physical properties and interactions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Obtain a semi empirical binding energy per nucleon formula. Using this as a guide, explain why the Coulomb force, which is only about \(\frac{1}{100}\) as strong as the internucleon attraction for two protons "in contact" (cf. Table 11.2), would eventually have to become a dominant factor in large nuclei. Assume that \(Z . N\), and \(A\) increase in rough proportion to one another.

Potassium. \(40(Z=19 . N=21)\) is a radioactive isotope that is rare but not unknown in nature. It is particularly interesting in that it lies along the curve of stability yet decays by both \(\beta^{+}\) and \(\beta^{-}\) - that is, in both directions away from the curve of stability. (a) Identify the daughter nuclei for both decays. (b) Many factors governing nuclear stability are discussed in the chapter (e.g., those in the semiempirical binding energy formula, magic numbers, and even numbers). Identify those that would argue only for \(\beta^{-}\) decay. (c) Which factors argue only for \(\beta^{+}\) decay? (d) Which argue for either \(\beta^{-}\) or \(\beta^{+}\) decay?

For the lightest of nuclei, binding energy per nucleon is not a very reliable gauge of stability. There is no nucleon binding at all for a single proton or neutron. yet one is stable (so far as we know) and the other is not. (a) Helium- 3 and hydrogen-3 (tritium) differ only in the switch of a nucleon. Which has the higher binding energy per nucleon? (b) Helium- 3 is stable, while tritium, in fact, decays into helium-3. Does this somehow violate laws?

As noted in Section \(11.5,\) carbon- 11 decays to boron. 11 . How do the various factors involved in nuclear stability argue that such a decay is favorable?

Calculate the binding energy per nucleon of carbon-12.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free