Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In Section 11.2 , it is said that iron and nickel represent maxinuin stability. Chemistry emphaxizes that helium is the most stable element? How can these claims be reconciled?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The reconciliation of the claims lies in the understanding that they refer to two distinct types of stability – nuclear and chemical. Iron and nickel are the most stable in terms of nuclear physics because of their high binding energy per nucleon, while helium is the most stable in chemistry due to its full electron shell configuration.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Nuclear and Chemical Stability

To answer this question, it is important to understand the differences between nuclear and chemical stability. Nuclear stability refers to the stability of an element's nucleus and it is best understood by looking at the binding energy per nucleon. In this context, iron (Fe) and nickel (Ni) show maximum stability because they have the highest binding energy per nucleon. This physical phenomenon relates to nuclear reactions, such as fission or fusion.
02

Understanding Helium Stability

Helium, on the other hand, is considered to be the most stable element in a chemical context. This is because Helium has a completely full electron shell and is not prone to reactions. This is a chemical property, not related to the nucleus of the atom.
03

Reconciling the Two Concepts

So, these two statements can be reconciled by understanding they are referring to two different manifestations of stability: nuclear and chemical. Iron and nickel are the most stable in terms of nuclear forces and energy, while helium is the most chemically stable due to its electron configuration.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Binding Energy Per Nucleon
Understanding the concept of 'binding energy per nucleon' is crucial when discussing the stability of atomic nuclei. It represents the energy that would be required to remove a nucleon, which is either a proton or neutron, from the nucleus of an atom. A higher binding energy per nucleon indicates a more stable nucleus, as it means that more energy is required to break the nucleus apart.

In the context of iron (Fe) and nickel (Ni), these elements have among the highest binding energy per nucleon values. This is why, in nuclear terms, they are considered to exhibit maximum stability. The greater the binding energy per nucleon, the more work is necessary to separate the nucleons, hence such nuclei are less likely to undergo spontaneous changes, making them significantly stable.
Nuclear Stability
Nuclear stability is concerned with the dynamics and forces at play within an atomic nucleus. Several factors influence this stability, including the ratio of protons to neutrons and the overall size of the nucleus. Stable nuclei are less likely to change spontaneously through radioactive decay.

Iron and nickel have particularly stable ratios and the energies required to force these nuclei to change via nuclear reactions are incredibly high, demonstrating remarkable nuclear stability. The favorability of nuclear reactions such as fission and fusion is directly tied to the nuclear stability of the involved elements.
Chemical Stability
Unlike nuclear stability, which is concerned with the nucleus, chemical stability pertains to the likelihood of an atom to partake in chemical reactions and form compounds. This characteristic is highly dependent on the electron shell configuration. An atom like helium (He) is chemically inert and thus extraordinarily stable, as it has a full valence shell of electrons.

Atoms with a full outer electron shell, like He with its completed first shell, are chemically stable because they have little tendency to gain, lose, or share electrons. This is in stark contrast to elements with incomplete outer shells, which are more chemically reactive in pursuit of electron arrangements that confer stability.
Electron Shell Configuration
The electron shell configuration of an atom plays a pivotal role in determining its chemical reactivity and stability. Each shell can hold a certain number of electrons, and atoms strive for a full outer shell, a state known as a noble gas configuration. Helium's stability is derived from having a complete outer shell, which consists of two electrons.

Helium's electron configuration is denoted as 1s², indicating it has two electrons in its first and only energy level (shell). This complete shell means helium exhibits low reactivity and high chemical stability, as it does not need to engage in chemical bonding to achieve stability. Elements with incomplete outer shells, however, seek to fill or empty their outermost shells through bonding, making them more chemically reactive.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

For the lightest of nuclei, binding energy per nucleon is not a very reliable gauge of stability. There is no nucleon binding at all for a single proton or neutron. yet one is stable (so far as we know) and the other is not. (a) Helium- 3 and hydrogen-3 (tritium) differ only in the switch of a nucleon. Which has the higher binding energy per nucleon? (b) Helium- 3 is stable, while tritium, in fact, decays into helium-3. Does this somehow violate laws?

The total kinetic energy carried by the products of the spontaneous fission of plutonium- 240 is typically about \(180 \mathrm{MeV}\). Use this to argue that reduction in Coulomb repulsion is the main impetus behind the process. Assume for simplicity that the two fragment nuclei are of equal \(Z\).

MRI relies on only a tiny majority of the nuclear magnetic moments aligning with the external field. Consider the common target nucleus hydrogen. The difference between the aligned and antialigned states of a dipole in a magnetic field is \(2 \mu, B\). Equation \((8-7)\) can be used to find \(\mu_{-}\) for the proton. provided that the correct mass and gyromagnetic ratio \(\left(g_{p}=5.6\right)\) are inserted. Using the Boltzmann distribution, show that for a \(1.0 \mathrm{~T}\) field and a reasonable temperature, the number aligned exceeds the number antialigned by less than \(\frac{1}{1000} \%\).

Certain nuclei with half-lives between days and a few years are found in nature in small abundances that do not change al all over many, many years. How is this possible? (Hint: Natural uranium and thorium have ren long half- lives.)

All target nuclei used in MRI have an odd number of protons or neutrons or both. What does this suggest about nuclear spins? (Note: Both the proton and the neutron have gyromagnetic ratios.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free