Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A neutral metal rod of length 60 cm falls toward the Earth. The rod is horizontal and oriented east west. (1) Which end of the rod, east or west, has excess electrons? Explain using physics diagrams. (2) At a moment when the rod’s speed is 4m/s , approximately how many excess electrons are at the negative end of the rod?

Short Answer

Expert verified

1.224×1014R

Step by step solution

01

Given Data

L=60 cmspeed=4 m/searthmagneticfieldB=2×105 T

02

Concept

The measurement of excess electrons is the amount of electrons carried within a charge.

03

Find the excess electrons

Due to the motion of conducting rod through a magnetic field “B” are induced emf is developed in it.

ξ =BLv sin θ

Where, earth’s magnetic field acts S - N and conductor is held E - W, so θ=90°

ξ=BLv=2×105×0.6×4=4.8×105

Due to this emf an induced current generated in the rod is,

I=Net=ξRwhere,t=vg=49.8=0.4082

R is resistance

e is charge of electrons e=1.6×1019 C

Therefore the excess number of electrons across the conducting rod is,

N=ξteR=4.8×105×0.40821.6×1019×R=1.224×1014R

Hence, the excess number of electrons is1.224×1014R

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A long solenoid with diameter 4 cm is in a vacuum, and a lithium nucleus ( 4 neutrons and 3 protons ) is in a clockwise circular orbit inside the solenoid ( Figure 20.102 ). It takes \({\bf{50ns}}\,\left( {{\bf{50 \times 1}}{{\bf{0}}^{{\bf{ - 9}}}}{\bf{s}}} \right)\) for the lithium nucleus to complete one orbit.

  1. Does the current in the solenoid run clockwise or counter clockwise ? Explain including physics diagrams.

Suppose that a proton has a component of velocity parallel to the magnetic field as well as perpendicular to it (Figure 20.80). What is the effect of the magnetic field on this parallel component of the velocity? What will the trajectory of the proton look like?

We will consider the possibility that a free electron acted on by an electric field could gain enough energy to ionize an air molecule in a collision. (a) Consider an electron that starts from rest in a region where there is an electric field (due to some charged objects nearby) whose magnitude is nearly constant. If the electron travels a distance dand the magnitude of the electric field is E,what isthe potential difference through which the electron travels? (Pay attention to signs: Is the electron traveling with the electric field or opposite to the electric field?) (b) What is the change in potential energy of the system in this process? (c) What is the change in the kinetic energy of the electron in this process? (d) We found the mean free path of an electron in air to be about 5×10-7m, and in the previous question you calculated the energy required to knock an electron out of an atom. What is the magnitude of the electric field that would be required in order for an electron to gain sufficient kinetic energy to ionize a nitrogen molecule? (e) The electric field required to cause a spark in air is observed to be about 3×106V/mat STP. What is the ratio of the magnitude of the field you calculated in the previous part to the observed value at STP? (f) What is it reasonable to conclude about this model of how air becomes ionized? (1) Since we used accurate numbers, this is a huge discrepancy, and the model is wrong. (2) Considering the approximations we made, this is pretty good agreement, and the model may be correct.

We will consider the possibility that a free electron actedon by an electric field could gain enough energy to ionize anair molecule in a collision. (a) Consider an electron that startsfrom rest in a region where there is an electric field (due to somecharged objects nearby) whose magnitude is nearly constant. Ifthe electron travels a distance dand the magnitude of the electric field is E,what isthe potential difference through which the electron travels? (Pay attention to signs: Is the electron traveling with the electric field or opposite to the electric field?) (b) What is the change in potential energy of the system in this process? (c) What is the change in the kinetic energy of the electron in this process? (d) We found the mean free path of an electron in air to be about 5×10-7m, and in the previous question you calculated the energy required to knock an electron out of an atom. What is the magnitude of the electric field that would be required in order for an electron to gain sufficient kinetic energy to ionize a nitrogen molecule? (e) The electric field required to cause a spark in air is observed to be about 3×106V/m at STP. What is the ratio of the magnitude of the field you calculated in the previous part to the observed value at STP? (f) What is it reasonable to conclude about this model of how air becomes ionized? (1) Since we used accurate numbers, this is a huge discrepancy, and the model is wrong. (2) Considering the approximations we made, this is pretty good agreement, and the model may be correct.

We will consider the possibility that a free electron acted on by an electric field could gain enough energy to ionize an air molecule in a collision. (a) Consider an electron that starts from rest in a region where there is an electric field (due to some charged objects nearby) whose magnitude is nearly constant. If the electron travels a distance dand the magnitude of the electric field is E ,what isthe potential difference through which the electron travels? (Pay attention to signs: Is the electron traveling with the electric field or opposite to the electric field?) (b) What is the change in potential energy of the system in this process? (c) What is the change in the kinetic energy of the electron in this process? (d) We found the mean free path of an electron in air to be about 5×10-7m, and in the previous question you calculated the energy required to knock an electron out of an atom. What is the magnitude of the electric field that would be required in order for an electron to gain sufficient kinetic energy to ionize a nitrogen molecule? (e) The electric field required to cause a spark in air is observed to be about3×106V/m at STP. What is the ratio of the magnitude of the field you calculated in the previous part to the observed value at STP? (f) What is it reasonable to conclude about this model of how air becomes ionized? (1) Since we used accurate numbers, this is a huge discrepancy, and the model is wrong. (2) Considering the approximations we made, this is pretty good agreement, and the model may be correct.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free