Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Explain briefly why repulsion is a better test for the sign of a charged object than attraction is.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Repulsion is a better test for the sign of a charged object than attraction is.

Step by step solution

01

Concept

A charged object attracts oppositely charged objects and uncharged objects also.So, when a charged object is brought near a body, if the force is attractive, the body could be oppositely charged or uncharged, which was then induced due to the charged body that was brought close to this and will have the opposite charge. But repulsionhappens between two like charges.

02

Step 2:Repulsion as a test  

So, when a charged body is brought near another body,if repulsive force is experienced, it could be sure that the body has the same type of charge as the charged body.So, repulsion is better in identifying whether a body is uncharged.

Thus, repulsion is a better test for the sign of a charged object than attraction is.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A typical atomic polarizability is 1ร—10-40Cยทml(N/C). If theq in p=qsis equal to the proton charge e, what charge separation s could you produce in a typical atom by applying a large field of 3ร—106N/C, which is large enough to cause a spark in air?

Is the following statement true or false? If true, what principle makes it true? If false, give a counterexample or say why. See Figure 14.67.

โ€œThe electric field Epointat the center of an induced dipole, due to the point charge, is equal in magnitude and opposite in direction to the electric field Edipoleat the location of the point charge, due to the induced dipole.โ€

Criticize the following statement: "Since an atom's electron cloud is spherical, the effect of the electrons cancels the effect of the nucleus, so a neutral atom can't interact with a charged object." ("Criticize" means to explain why the given statement is inadequate or incorrect, as well as to correct it.)

A student said, โ€œWhen you touch a charged piece of metal, the metal is no longer charged: all the charge on the metal is neutralized.โ€ As a practical matter, this is nearly correct, but it Isnโ€™t exactly right. Whatโ€™s wrong with saying that all the charge on the metal is neutralized?

A negatively charged iron block is placed in a region where there is an electric field downward (in the Y โˆ’ direction) due to charges not shown. Which of the diagrams (aโ€“f) in Figure 14.88 best describes the charge distribution in and/or on the iron block?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free