Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

You are wearing shoes with thick rubber soles. You briefly touch a negatively charged metal sphere. Afterward, the sphere seems to have little or no charge. Why? Explain in detail.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The sphere seems to have little or no charge because the transfer of the charges to the thick rubber soles takes place due to the rubbing action.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the transfer of electron through friction (rubbing action)

In this problem, the concept of transfer of electron (charge) through a mode of friction (rubbing action) will be used to evaluate the charge on the sphere.

When an insulating type of material rubs with each other, then the transfer of electron particle from one specific material to another material takes place with the help of rubbed-off action.

02

Analysis of the transfer of charge (electron) between the thick rubber soles and the metal sphere

When you wear any shoes having thick rubber soles and touch a negatively charged metal sphere, then there would be the transfer of negative charge (electron) on the rubber soles that takes place with the help of rubbing action. So, the transfer of negative charge electrons to the rubber soles (rubbed off) from the metal sphere reflects little or no charge on the sphere.

You don’t ever actually transmit the charge through insulated boots either during accumulation or discharge.

Thus, the sphere seems to have little or no charge because the transfer of the charges to the thick rubber soles takes place due to the frictional action (rubbing).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Which of the following could be reasonable explanations for how a piece of invisible tape gets charged? Select all that apply. (1) Protons are pulled out of nuclei in one tape and transferred to another tape. (2) Charged molecular fragments are broken off one tape and transferred to another. (3) Electrons are pulled out of molecules in one tape and transferred to another tape. (4) Neutrons are pulled out of nuclei in one tape and transferred to another tape.

You have two identical neutral metal spheres labeled A and B, mounted on insulating posts, and you have a plastic pen that charges negatively when you rub it on your hair (Figure 14.77).


(a) (+ and −) Explain in detail, including diagrams, what operations you would carry out to give sphere A some positive charge and sphere B an equal amount of negative charge. (b) (+ and +) Explain in detail, including diagrams, what operations you would carry out on the neutral spheres to give sphere A some positive charge and sphere B an equal amount of positive charge (the spheres are initially uncharged).

A glass sphere carrying a uniformly distributed charge of +Qis surrounded by an initially neutral spherical plastic shell (Figure 15.67).

(a) Qualitatively, indicate the polarization of the plastic. (b) Qualitatively, indicate the polarization of the inner glass sphere. Explain briefly. (c) Is the electric field at location P outside the plastic shell larger, smaller, or the same as it would be if the plastic weren’t there? Explain briefly. (d) Now suppose that the glass sphere carrying a uniform charge of +Qis surrounded by an initially neutral metal shell (Figure 15.68). Qualitatively, indicate the polarization of the metal.

e) Now be quantitative about the polarization of the metal sphere and prove your assertions. (f) Is the electric field at location P outside the metal shell larger, smaller, or the same as it would be if the metal shell weren’t there? Explain briefly.

A point charge of 3×109 Cis located at the origin.

(a) What is the magnitude of the electric field at location 0.2,0,0 m?

(b) Next, a short, straight, thin copper wire 3 mmlong is placed along the x axis with its center at location 0.1,0,0 m. What is the approximate change in the magnitude of the electric field at location 0.2,0,0 m?

(c) Does the magnitude of the electric field at location 0.2,0,0 m increase or decrease as a result of placing the copper wire between this location and the point charge?

(d) Does the copper metal block the electric field contributed by the point charge?

A positively charged sphere is placed near a neutral block of nickel, as shown in Figure 14.92. (a) Which of the diagrams in Figure 14.93 best represents the equilibrium distribution of charge on the neutral nickel block?

(b) At location P inside the nickel block the electric field due to the charged sphere is <-625,0,0>N/C. At equilibrium, which of the following statements must be true? (1) It is not possible to determine the electric field at location P due only to charges on the surface of the nickel block. (2) The electric field at location P due only to charges on the surface of the nickel block is <0,0,0>N/C. (3) Because the net electric field at location P is <0,0,0>N/C, the field at P due only to charges on the surface of the polarized nickel block must be <625,0,0>N/C.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free