Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Calculate (x),(x2),(p),(p2),σxandσp,for the nth stationary state of the infinite square well. Check that the uncertainty principle is satisfied. Which state comes closest to the uncertainty limit?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The uncertainty principle is satisfied.

For1.136h2>h2n = 1 is the state that comes closest to the uncertainty limit.

The required values are:

x=a2x2a213-12n2π2p=0p2=ħnπa2σx=a213-2nπ2σp=ħnπa

Step by step solution

01

Step 1: Define the Schrodinger equation

A differential equation that describes matter in quantum mechanics in terms of the wave-like properties of particles in a field. Its answer is related to a particle's probability density in space and time.

02

Determine the uncertainty principle

The stationary state for the infinite potential well is:

ψnx=2asinax

Calculate all the expectation values and the variance in that values as we did in chapter one. The expectation value of the position is:

x=2a0a×sinnπaxdx

Using integration by parts, so we get:

x=a2

03

Determine the expectation position and momentum

The expectation for the position squared is:

x2=2aanπ30nπy2sinydyx2=a213-12n2π2

The expectation value for the momentum operator is:

p=-iħ2a0asinnπaxcosnπaxdxp=-iħ2aanπ0nπsinysocydyp=0

p2=-ħ2anπa20asin2nπaxdxp2=ħπna2p2=ħπna2

04

Determine the variance of position and momentum

Find the variance for position and momentum:

σx=x2-x2

Substitute the values, and we get,

σx=a213-2nπ2

σp=p2-p2

Substitute the values, and we get,

σp=ħnπa

Finally, the closet state to the uncertainty limit is the state with the lowest possible energy (n = 1), where we can prove this by:

role="math" localid="1658122114260" σxσp=ħ2π23-2=1.136ħ2

And

1.136ħ2>ħ2

The uncertainty principle is satisfied.

For 1.136ħ2>ħ2n = 1 is the state that comes closest to the uncertainty limit.

The required values are:

x=a2x2=a213-12n2π2p=0p2=ħnπa2σx=a213-2nπ2σp=ħnπa

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The Dirac delta function can be bought off as the limiting case of a rectangle area 1, as the height goes to infinity and the width goes to Zero. Show that the delta function well (Equation 2.114) is weak potential (even though it is infinitely deep), in the sense that Z00. Determine the bound state energy for the delta function potential, by treating it as the limit of a finite square well. Check that your answer is consistent with equation 2.129. Also, show that equation 2.169 reduces to Equation 2.141 in the appropriate limit.

In Problem 2.7 (d), you got the expectation value of the energy by summing the series in Equation 2.39, but 1 warned you (in footnote 15 not to try it the "old fashioned way,"<H>=Ψ(x,0)*HΨ(x,0)dx, because the discontinuous first derivative ofΨ(x.0)renders the second derivative problematic. Actually, you could have done it using integration by parts, but the Dirac delta function affords a much cleaner way to handle such anomalies.

(a) Calculate the first derivative of Ψ(x.0)(in Problem 2.7), and express the answer in terms of the step function, θ(x-c1/2)defined in Equation (Don't worry about the end points-just the interior region

(b) Exploit the result of Problem 2.24(b) to write the second derivative of Ψ(x,0)in terms of the delta function.

(c) Evaluate the integral Ψ(x,0)*HΨ(x,0)dxand check that you get the same answer as before.

Prove the following three theorem;

a) For normalizable solutions the separation constant E must be real as E0+iτand show that if equation 1.20 is to hold for all t,τ must be zero.

b) The time - independent wave function localid="1658117146660" ψ(x) can always be taken to be real, This doesn’t mean that every solution to the time-independent Schrodinger equation is real; what it says is that if you’ve got one that is not, it can always be expressed as a linear combination of solutions that are . So, you might as well stick toψ ’s that are real

c) If is an even function then ψ(x)can always be taken to be either even or odd

Show that [Aeikx+Be-ikx] and [Ccos(kx)+Dsin(kx)] are equivalent ways of writing the same function of x, and determine the constants C and D in terms of Aand B, and vice versa.

A particle in the infinite square well (Equation 2.22) has the initial wave function Ψ (x, 0) = A sin3(πx/a) (0 ≤ x ≤ a). Determine A, find Ψ(x, t), and calculate 〈x〉as a function of time. What is the expectation value of the energy? Hint: sinnθ and cosnθ can be reduced, by repeated application of the
trigonometric sum formulas, to linear combinations of sin(mθ) and cos(mθ), with m = 0, 1, 2, . . ., n.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free