Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

This is a strictly qualitative problem-no calculations allowed! Consider the "double square well" potential (Figure 2.21). Suppose the depth V0and the width a are fixed, and large enough so that several bound states occur.

(a) Sketch the ground state wave function Ψ1and the first excited state localid="1658211858701" Ψ2(i) for the case b = 0 (ii) forbaand (iii) for ba

(b) Qualitatively, how do the corresponding energies(E1andE2)and vary, as b goes from 0 to ? Sketch E1(b)and E2(b)on the same graph.

(c) The double well is a very primitive one-dimensional model for the potential experienced by an electron in a diatomic molecule (the two wells represent the attractive force of the nuclei). If the nuclei are free to move, they will adopt the configuration of minimum energy. In view of your conclusions in (b), does the electron tend to draw the nuclei together, or push them apart? (Of course, there is also the internuclear repulsion to consider, but that's a separate problem.)

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a)The sketch is

(i)

(ii)

(iii)

(b) The graph with and is,

(c)The electron forces the nuclei apart in the first excited state.

The ground state has the lowest energy in configuration I, and with b, the electron tends to attract the nuclei together, enhancing atom bonding.

Step by step solution

01

Define the energy

Power is generated by the use of physical or chemical resources, particularly to create light and heat or to operate machines.

02

Step 2: Draw the graph

(a)

Consider the potential graph shown below. If b=0 , the issue will be a standard finite square well with exponential decay outside and sinusoidal decay within. As a result of the potential's symmetry at the origin, the first solution is cosine, while the second is sine. There is only one node for the sine and none for the cosine.

  1. For b=0




2. For ba Even ground condition. Outside, sinusoidal inside the wells, and hyperbolic cosine inside the barrier. The oddest initial excited state is a hyperbolic sine in the barrier. One without a node ψ1 and two with a node ψ2.


3. For b a Similar to (ii), the wave function in the barrier area is quite small. Essentially, there are two isolated finite square wells named and , which are even and odd linear combinations of the two distinct wells' ground states and are degenerate (in energy).



03

Step 3: Graph the values of E1(b) and E2(b)

(b)

When b is close to a in the second scenario, the exponential decay outside, sinusoidal inside the wells, and hyperbolic cosine inside the barrier all signify that the ground state is even. Odd, which in barrier terms denotes hyperbolic sine, describes the first excited state. There are no nodes for ψ1and ψ2, respectively.

04

Action of the electron

(c)

Here when b = 0 the energies above the bottom are shown:

En+V0n2π2h22m2a2

so,

E1+V0π2h22m2a2E2+V04π2h22m2a2

For bathe width of each well is a,

E1+V0E2+V0π2h22ma2

Where:

h=π2h22ma2

The ground state has the lowest energy in configuration I, and with b, the electron tends to attract the nuclei together, enhancing atom bonding.

Therefore, the electron, on the other hand, forces the nuclei apart in the first excited state.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show that E must be exceed the minimum value of V(x) ,for every normalizable solution to the time independent Schrodinger equation what is classical analog to this statement?

d2Ψdx2=2mh2[V(x)E]Ψ;

IfE<Vmin thenΨ and its second derivative always have the same sign. Is it normalized?

A particle in the harmonic oscillator potential starts out in the stateΨ(x,0)=A[3ψ0(x)+4ψ1(x)]

a) Find A.

b) Construct Ψ(x,t)and|Ψ(x,t)2|

c) Find xand p. Don't get too excited if they oscillate at the classical frequency; what would it have been had I specified ψ2(x), instead of ψ1(x)?Check that Ehrenfest's theorem holds for this wave function.

d) If you measured the energy of this particle, what values might you get, and with what probabilities?

Prove the following three theorem;

a) For normalizable solutions the separation constant E must be real as E0+iτand show that if equation 1.20 is to hold for all t,τ must be zero.

b) The time - independent wave function localid="1658117146660" ψ(x) can always be taken to be real, This doesn’t mean that every solution to the time-independent Schrodinger equation is real; what it says is that if you’ve got one that is not, it can always be expressed as a linear combination of solutions that are . So, you might as well stick toψ ’s that are real

c) If is an even function then ψ(x)can always be taken to be either even or odd

Imagine a bead of mass m that slides frictionlessly around a circular wire ring of circumference L. (This is just like a free particle, except that Ψ(x+L)=Ψ(x)find the stationary states (with appropriate normalization) and the corresponding allowed energies. Note that there are two independent solutions for each energy En-corresponding to clockwise and counter-clockwise circulation; call themΨn+(x) andΨn-(x) How do you account for this degeneracy, in view of the theorem in Problem 2.45 (why does the theorem fail, in this case)?

The Dirac delta function can be bought off as the limiting case of a rectangle area 1, as the height goes to infinity and the width goes to Zero. Show that the delta function well (Equation 2.114) is weak potential (even though it is infinitely deep), in the sense that Z00. Determine the bound state energy for the delta function potential, by treating it as the limit of a finite square well. Check that your answer is consistent with equation 2.129. Also, show that equation 2.169 reduces to Equation 2.141 in the appropriate limit.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free