Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider a charged particle in the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator potential. Suppose we turn on a weak electric field (E), so that the potential energy is shifted by an amountH'=-qEx.(a) Show that there is no first-order change in the energy levels, and calculate the second-order correction. Hint: See Problem 3.33.

(b) The Schrödinger equation can be solved directly in this case, by a change of variablesx'x-(qE/2). Find the exact energies, and show that they are consistent with the perturbation theory approximation.

Short Answer

Expert verified

To calculate energy corrections, one needs to find matrix elements (or expectation values) of the perturbation Hamiltonian in an unperturbed basis.

First order correction =0

Second order correctionE=ħωn+12-q2E222

Step by step solution

01

Prove that the diagonal matrix element vanishes for every eigen state of the quantum harmonic oscillator.

a)

See how the interaction Hamiltonian includes the position operator:

He=-qEx, prove that the diagonal matrix element (or equivalently expectation value of the position operator) vanishes for every eigen state of the quantum harmonic oscillator. Express the position operator in the terms of raising and lowering operators:x=ħ2(a++a-)

Next, calculate the n-th diagonal matrix element:

n>=ħ2na++a-n=0En1=0

The latter is equal to zero because the lowering operator turns n~n-1and raising operator turnsn~n+1, so the both inner products vanish since the different eigen states are mutually orthogonal. Therefore, there are no corrections of the first order in the energy levels.

Second order corrections are calculated by the useof the following relation:

Ej2=i=jiHej2Ei0-Ej0

Where Ek0denote the unperturbed energy levels - energy levels of the harmonic oscillator. Start by expressing the interaction Hamiltonian in the terms of raising and lowering operators:

Hi=-qEħ2a++a-

Proceed by doing calculation of the following matrix elements:

iHej=-qEħ2ia++a-j=-qEħ2ia+j+ia-j=-qEħ2ij+1j+1+ijj-1=-qEħ2j+1δi,j+1+i,j-1

02

Second order correction.

See that the only non-vanishing matrix elements are the ones neighbouring j-th element. Therefore, the sum in equation (1) is simplified, having only two contributing terms:

Ej2=qEħ2j2Ej-10-Ej0+qEħ2j+12Ej+10-Ej0

Since problem is dealing with the energy spectrum of the harmonic oscillator, the unperturbed energies are equidistant the distance between two increasing levels is equal toħω. Therefore, the terms in the denominators are easily evalued leading to:

Ej2=q2E2ħωħ2-j+1+jEj2=q2E22

What is interesting is that the energy corrections of the second order do not depend on the energy level jthat we are observing - all levels are corrected by the same amount. This is exactly the reason that would lead one to think that there might be an analytical method of obtaining the energy spectrum by manipulating the original Hamiltonian and attempting to solve it in a non-perturbative manner.

03

Solve the Schrödinger equation and find the exact energies.

b)

To solve the Schrodinger analytically, begin by the use of the following substitution:

x˙=x-qE/2x=x˙+qE/2

Next step is to insert this substitution into the original Schrodinger equation:

-ħ2m2x2ψx+122x2ψx-qExψx=x-ħ22m2x'2ψx˙+122x˙+qE/22ψx˙-qEx˙+qE/2ωx=x˙

It is important to notice that the change in derivative yields no extra factors, sincex˙x=1. Squaring the term in the brackets, obtain the following:

-ħ22m2x'2ψx'+122x'2+2x'qE/2+q2E2/m2ω4-qEx'b+qE/2ψx=x'

see that many terms cancel out, leaving this:

-ħ22m2x'2ψx'+122x'2=E+q2E2/22ψx˙

By defination E'E+q2E2/22the Schrodinger equation reads:

-ħ2m2x2ψx'+122x'2=E'ψx

Which is simply an equation of a quantum harmonic oscillator, with known solutions. Therefore, the energies of the original problem,E, are given by a simple relation:

ħωn+12=E+q2E2/2m2E=ħωn+12-q2E222

This is exactly the same result that is obtained by calculating the energy corrections of the second order. This implies that perturbative method actually provided the exact solution. This is usually not the case - usually one would have to calculate infinite corrections to approach the exact value.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Starting with Equation 6.80, and using Equations 6.57, 6.61, 6.64, and 6.81, derive Equation 6.82.

Question: The most prominent feature of the hydrogen spectrum in the visible region is the red Balmer line, coming from the transition n = 3to n = 2. First of all, determine the wavelength and frequency of this line according to the Bohr Theory. Fine structure splits this line into several closely spaced lines; the question is: How many, and what is their spacing? Hint: First determine how many sublevels the n = 2level splits into, and find Efs1for each of these, in eV. Then do the same for n = 3. Draw an energy level diagram showing all possible transitions from n = 3to n = 2. The energy released (in the form of a photon) is role="math" localid="1658311193797" (E3-E2)+E, the first part being common to all of them, and the E(due to fine structure) varying from one transition to the next. Find E(in eV) for each transition. Finally, convert to photon frequency, and determine the spacing between adjacent spectral lines (in Hz- -not the frequency interval between each line and the unperturbed line (which is, of course, unobservable), but the frequency interval between each line and the next one. Your final answer should take the form: "The red Balmer line splits into (???)lines. In order of increasing frequency, they come from the transitionsto (1) j =(???),toj =(???) ,(2) j =(???) to j =(???)……. The frequency spacing between line (1)and line (2)is (???) Hz, the spacing between line (2)and (3) line (???) Hzis……..”

If I=0, then j=s,mj=ms, and the "good" states are the same (nms)for weak and strong fields. DetermineEz1(from Equation) and the fine structure energies (Equation 6.67), and write down the general result for the I=O Zeeman Effect - regardless of the strength of the field. Show that the strong field formula (Equation 6.82) reproduces this result, provided that we interpret the indeterminate term in square brackets as.

Consider a particle of mass m that is free to move in a one-dimensional region of length L that closes on itself (for instance, a bead that slides frictionlessly on a circular wire of circumference L, as inProblem 2.46).

(a) Show that the stationary states can be written in the formψn(x)=1Le2πinx/L,(-L/2<x<L/2),

wheren=0,±1,±2,....and the allowed energies areEn=2mnπL2.Notice that with the exception of the ground state (n = 0 ) – are all doubly degenerate.

(b) Now suppose we introduce the perturbation,H'=-V0e-x2/a2where aLa. (This puts a little “dimple” in the potential at x = 0, as though we bent the wire slightly to make a “trap”.) Find the first-order correction to En, using Equation 6.27. Hint: To evaluate the integrals, exploit the fact that aLato extend the limits from ±L/2to±after all, H′ is essentially zero outside -a<x<a.

E±1=12Waa+Wbb±Waa-Wbb2+4Wab2(6.27).

(c) What are the “good” linear combinations ofψnandψ-n, for this problem? Show that with these states you get the first-order correction using Equation 6.9.

En'=ψn0H'ψn0(6.9).

(d) Find a hermitian operator A that fits the requirements of the theorem, and show that the simultaneous Eigenstates ofH0and A are precisely the ones you used in (c).

Show thatP2is Hermitian, butP4is not, for hydrogen states withl=0. Hint: For such statesψis independent ofθandϕ, so

localid="1656070791118" p2=-2r2ddr(r2ddr)

(Equation 4.13). Using integration by parts, show that

localid="1656069411605" <fp2g>=-4πh2(r2fdgdr-r2gdfdr)0+<p2fg>

Check that the boundary term vanishes forψn00, which goes like

ψn00~1π(na)3/2exp(-r/na)

near the origin. Now do the same forp4, and show that the boundary terms do not vanish. In fact:

<ψn00p4ψm00>=84a4(n-m)(nm)5/2+<p4ψn00ψm00>

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free