Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Show thatP2is Hermitian, butP4is not, for hydrogen states withl=0. Hint: For such statesψis independent ofθandϕ, so

localid="1656070791118" p2=-2r2ddr(r2ddr)

(Equation 4.13). Using integration by parts, show that

localid="1656069411605" <fp2g>=-4πh2(r2fdgdr-r2gdfdr)0+<p2fg>

Check that the boundary term vanishes forψn00, which goes like

ψn00~1π(na)3/2exp(-r/na)

near the origin. Now do the same forp4, and show that the boundary terms do not vanish. In fact:

<ψn00p4ψm00>=84a4(n-m)(nm)5/2+<p4ψn00ψm00>

Short Answer

Expert verified

Thus,p2 is Hermitian, butp4 is not

Step by step solution

01

Hermitian for  P2

P2is Hermitian, but P4is not,

P2=-2r2ddr(r2ddr)

The p2is Hermitian if,

fP2g=P2fg

so, to show that, we use:

fP2g=-20f1r2ddrr2dgdr4πr2dr=-4π20fddrr2dgdrdr

02

use integration by parts to solve for Hermitian of P2  .

To evaluate this integral, we use the integration by parts technique:

u=f,dv=ddrr2dgdrdrdu=dfdrdr,v=r2dgdrl=r2fdgdr0-0r2dfdrdgdrdr

03

 again, use integration by parts

By using the integration by parts once more,

u=r2dfdr,dv=dgdrdrdu=ddrr2dfdrdr,v=gI'=r2gdfdr|0-0ddrr2dfdrgdr

then,

<fp2g>=-4πh2(r2fdgdr-r2gdfdr)0+0ddrr2dfdrgdr

04

check at boundary

- If

r0=0rgf0r2fdgdr-r2gdfdr|0

vanishes at the boundaries.

Multiplying the R.H.S. byr2r2 ,

05

solve further

solve further

fP2g=-201r2ddrr2dfdrg.4πr2drfP2g=P2flg

Then,P2 is Hermitian.

06

solve for P4

Now, for P4:

P4=4r2ddrr2ddr1r2ddrr2ddr

By applying the same method,

fP4g=401r2fddrr2ddrr2dgdr4πr2dr=4π40fddrr2ddr1r2ddrr2dgdrdr

07

use integration by parts

By using integration by parts:

u=f,dv=ddrr2ddr1r2ddrr2dgdrdrdu=dfdrdr,v=r2ddr1r2ddrr2dgdr

Solve further

I1=r2fddr1r2ddrr2dgdr|0-0r2dfdrddr1r2ddrr2dgdrdru=r2dfdr,dv=ddr1r2ddrr2dgdrdrdu=ddrr2dfdrdrv=1r2ddrr2dgdr

solve further

localid="1656073604117" fP4g=4π4r2fddr1r2ddrr2dgdr-dfdrddrr2dgdr+ddrr2dfdrdgdr-r2gddr1r2ddrr2dfdr|0+P4fg

localid="1656131027955" role="math" u=1r2ddrr2dfdrl2=dfdrddrr2dgdr0-01r2ddrr2dfdrddrr2dgdrdrdrI3=ddrr2dfdrdgdr|0-0r2ddr1r2ddrr2dfdrdgdrdru=r2ddr/dr1r2ddrr2dfdr

dv=dgdrdrdu=ddrr2ddr(1r2ddrr2dfdrdr,v=g,I4=r2gddr1r2ddrr2dfdr|0-0ddrr2ddr1r2ddrr2dfdrgdrg=0ddrr2ddr1r2ddrr2dfdrgdr

08

check the boundary terms

To check the boundary terms:

Take,

f(r)=e-rnag(r)=e-rma

By substituting into the last equation.

dgdr=-1mae-rmadfdr=-1nae-rnar2dgdr=(-r2ma)e-rma

Solve further

ddrr2dgdr=-2rmae-rma+r2m2a2e-rma1r2ddrr2dgdr=-2mar+1m2a2e-rmaddr1r2ddrr2dgdr=-1ma-2mar+1m2a2e-rma+2mar2e-rma

09

solve further

r2fddr1r2ddrr2dgdr=2rm2a2-r2m3a3+2mae-rmae-rnar2dgdr=-r2mae-rmaddrr2dgdr=-2rma+r2m2a2e-rma

Solve further

dfdrddrr2dgdr=-1na-2rma+r2m2a2e-rmae-rnar2dfdr=-r2nae-rnaddrr2dfdr=-2rna+r2n2a2e-rna1r2ddrr2dfdr-2nar+1n2a2e-rnadrdrr2dfdrdgdr=-1ma-2rna+r2n2a2e-rmae-rnadfdr=-2rna+r2n2a2e-rnadxddr1r2ddrr2dfdr=-1na-2nar+1n2a2+2nar2e-rnar2gddr1r2ddrr2dfdr=2rn2a2-r2n3a3+2nae-rnae-rma

10

reduce the equation

When , r0the terms (2) and (3) vanish, so the equation can be reduced to;

role="math" localid="1656136148574" fP4g=4π42ma-2na+P4fg=8π4a1m-1n+P4fg

11

non-Hermitian of P4

Then, P4is non-Hermitian.

ψn001π(na)32e-raψm001π(ma)32e-rmaψn00P4ψm00=8π4an-mnm1πa3(nm)32+P4ψn00ψm00=84a4(n-m)nm52+P4ψn00ψm00P4ψn00ψm00=84a4(n-m)nm52+P4ψn00ψm00

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Analyze the Zeeman effect for the n=3states of hydrogen, in the weak, strong, and intermediate field regimes. Construct a table of energies (analogous to Table 6.2), plot them as functions of the external field (as in Figure 6.12), and check that the intermediate-field results reduce properly in the two limiting cases.

When an atom is placed in a uniform external electric field ,the energy levels are shifted-a phenomenon known as the Stark effect (it is the electrical analog to the Zeeman effect). In this problem we analyse the Stark effect for the n=1 and n=2 states of hydrogen. Let the field point in the z direction, so the potential energy of the electron is

H's=eEextz=eEextrcosθ

Treat this as a perturbation on the Bohr Hamiltonian (Equation 6.42). (Spin is irrelevant to this problem, so ignore it, and neglect the fine structure.)

(a) Show that the ground state energy is not affected by this perturbation, in first order.

(b) The first excited state is 4-fold degenerate: Y200,Y211,Y210,Y200,Y21-1Using degenerate perturbation theory, determine the first order corrections to the energy. Into how many levels does E2 split?

(c) What are the "good" wave functions for part (b)? Find the expectation value of the electric dipole moment (pe=-er) in each of these "good" states.Notice that the results are independent of the applied field-evidently hydrogen in its first excited state can carry a permanent electric dipole moment.

Question: The exact fine-structure formula for hydrogen (obtained from the Dirac equation without recourse to perturbation theory) is 16

Enj=mc2{1+an-j+12+j+122-a22-12-1}

Expand to order α4(noting that α1), and show that you recoverEquation .

(a) Find the second-order correction to the energies(En2)for the potential in Problem 6.1. Comment: You can sum the series explicitly, obtaining -for odd n.

(b) Calculate the second-order correction to the ground state energy(E02)for the potential in Problem 6.2. Check that your result is consistent with the exact solution.

If I=0, then j=s,mj=ms, and the "good" states are the same (nms)for weak and strong fields. DetermineEz1(from Equation) and the fine structure energies (Equation 6.67), and write down the general result for the I=O Zeeman Effect - regardless of the strength of the field. Show that the strong field formula (Equation 6.82) reproduces this result, provided that we interpret the indeterminate term in square brackets as.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free