Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose you don’t assumeH'aa=H'aa=0

(a) Findca(t)andcb(t)in first-order perturbation theory, for the case

ce(0)=1,cb(0)=0.show that |ca(1)(t)|2+|cb(1)(t)|2=1, to first order inH^' .

(b) There is a nicer way to handle this problem. Let

daeih0tHaac(tc)dtc0ca,dbei20tHbbc(tc)dtc0cb.

Show that

role="math" localid="1658561855290" d-a=-iheiϕH'abe-iω0tdb;db-=-iheiϕH'bae-iω0tda

where

ϕ(t)1h0l[H'aa(t')-H'bb(t')]dt'.

So the equations fordaanddbare identical in structure to Equation 11.17 (with an extra role="math" localid="1658562498216" eiϕtackedontoH^')

ca-=-ihH'abe-iω0tcb,cb-=-ihH'baeiω0tca

(c) Use the method in part (b) to obtainrole="math" localid="1658562468835" ca(t)andcb(t)in first-order
perturbation theory, and compare your answer to (a). Comment on any discrepancies.

Short Answer

Expert verified

ca2=1-ih0tHaat'dt1-ih0tHaat'dt=1+ih0tHaat'dt2=1cb2=-ih0tHbat'eiω0tdt'ih0tHabt'eiω0tdt'=0Soca2+cb2=1(tofirstorder)

da=-iheih0tHaat'dt'cbH'abeiω0t.db=-iheih0tHaat'dt'ihH'bbcb+eih0tHbbt'dt'cb

db=-ihe-iϕH'baeiω0tdb=-ih0te-iϕtH'bat'eiω0tdt'

Step by step solution

01

(a) Finding  ca(t) and cb(t)

ca=-ihcaH'aa+caH'abeiω0tca=-ihcbH'bb+caH'baeiω0t

role="math" localid="1658555553364" ca=-ihcaH'aa+cbH'abe-iEb-Eat/h

ca=-ihH'abeiω0tcb,cb=-ihH'baeiω0tca

role="math" localid="1658555600978" cb=-ihcbH'bb+caH'bae-iEb-Eat/h

Initial conditions: role="math" localid="1658555900086" ca0=1,cb0=0,

Zero order: ca0=1,cb0=0,

First order:ca=-ihH'aacat=1-ih0tH'aat'dt'cb=-ihH'baeiω0tcbt=1-ih0tH'bat'eiω0tdt'

ca2=1-ih0tHaat'dt1-ih0tHaat'dt=1+ih0tHaat'dt2=1tofirstorderinH'cb2=-ih0tHbat'eiω0tdt'ih0tHabt'eiω0tdt'=0tofirstorderinH'Soca2+cb2=1(tofirstorder)

02

(b) Showing  da=-iheiϕH'abeiω0tdb;da=-iheiϕH'baeiω0tda

db=-iheih0tHaat'dt'ihH'bbcb+eih0tHbbt'dt'cbButca=-ihcaH'aa+cbH'abe-iω0t

Two terms cancel, leaving

db=-iheih0tHaat'dt'cbHabe-iω0t.Butcb=e-ih0tH'bbt'dt'db=-iheih0tH'aat'-H'bbtdtHabeiω0tdb,orda=-iheiϕH'abeiω0tdb

Similarly,db=-iheih0tHaat'dt'ihH'bbcb=e-ih0tH'bbt'dt'db.Butcb=-ihcbHbb+caH'baeiω0t=-iheih0tHaat'dt'caH'baeiω0t.Butca=e-ih0tHaat'dt'da=-iheih0tH'bbt'-H'aa(t')dt'H'baeiω0tda=-iheiϕH'baeiω0tda

03

(c) Using the method in part (b) to obtain  ca(t) and cb(t)

Initial conditions:ca0=1da(0)=1;cb(0)=0db(0)=0.

Zero order:da(t)=1,dbt=0.

First order:d˙a=0dat=1cat=e-ih0tH'aa(t')dt'

d˙b=-ihe-iϕH'baeiω0tdb=-ih0te-iϕ(t')H'ba(t')eiω0t'dt'

These don’t look much like the results in (a), but remember, we’re only working to first order in H'Hsoca(t)1-ih0tH'aa(t')dt'(tothisorder),whileforcb,thefactorH'bain the integral means it is already first order and hence both the exponential factor in front and e-iϕshould be replaced by 1. Then cbt1-0tihH'aat'eiω0t'dt', and we recover the results in (a).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Solve Equation 9.13 for the case of a time-independent perturbation, assumingthatandcheck that

. Comment: Ostensibly, this system oscillates between “” Doesn’t this contradict my general assertion that no transitions occur for time-independent perturbations? No, but the reason is rather subtle: In this are not, and never were, Eigen states of the Hamiltonian—a measurement of the energy never yields. In time-dependent perturbation theory we typically contemplate turning on the perturbation for a while, and then turning it off again, in order to examine the system. At the beginning, and at the end,are Eigen states of the exact Hamiltonian, and only in this context does it make sense to say that the system underwent a transition from one to the other. For the present problem, then, assume that the perturbation was turned on at time t = 0, and off again at time T —this doesn’t affect the calculations, but it allows for a more sensible interpretation of the result.

ca=-ihHabeigtcb,cb=-ihHbaeigtca …(9.13).

The first term in Equation 9.25 comes from the eiωt/2, and the second from e-iωt/2.. Thus dropping the first term is formally equivalent to writing H^=(V/2)e-iωt, which is to say,

cbl-ihvba0tcos(ωt')eiω0t'dt'=-iVba2h0tej(ω0+ω)t'+ej(ω0-ω)t'dt'=--iVba2hej(ω0+ω)t'-1ω0+ω+ej(ω0-ω)t'-1ω0-ω(9.25).Hba'=Vba2e-iωt,Hab'=Vab2eiωt(9.29).

(The latter is required to make the Hamiltonian matrix hermitian—or, if you prefer, to pick out the dominant term in the formula analogous to Equation 9.25 forca(t). ) Rabi noticed that if you make this so-called rotating wave approximation at the beginning of the calculation, Equation 9.13 can be solved exactly, with no need for perturbation theory, and no assumption about the strength of the field.

c.a=-ihHab'e-iω0tcb,c.b=-ihHba'e-iω0tca,

(a) Solve Equation 9.13 in the rotating wave approximation (Equation 9.29), for the usual initial conditions: ca(0)=1,cb(0)=0. Express your results (ca(t)andcb(t))in terms of the Rabi flopping frequency,

ωr=12(ω-ω0)2+(Vab/h)2 (9.30).

(b) Determine the transition probability,Pab(t), and show that it never exceeds 1. Confirm that.

ca(t)2+cb(t)2=1.

(c) Check that Pab(t)reduces to the perturbation theory result (Equation 9.28) when the perturbation is “small,” and state precisely what small means in this context, as a constraint on V.

Pab(t)=cb(t)2Vab2hsin2ω0-ωt/2ω0-ω2(9.28)

(d) At what time does the system first return to its initial state?


Solve Equation 9.13 to second order in perturbation theory, for the general case ca(0)=a,cb(0)=bca=-ihH'abe-0tcb,cb=-ihH'bae-0tca

(9.13).

A particle of mass m is initially in the ground state of the (one-dimensional) infinite square well. At time t = 0 a “brick” is dropped into the well, so that the potential becomes

V(x)={V0,0xa/20,a/2<xa;,otherwise

where V0E1After a time T, the brick is removed, and the energy of the particle is measured. Find the probability (in first-order perturbation theory) that the result is nowE2 .

Develop time-dependent perturbation theory for a multi-level system, starting with the generalization of Equations 9.1 and 9.2:

H^0ψn=Enψn,   ψnψm=δnm (9.79)

At time t = 0 we turn on a perturbation H'(t)so that the total Hamiltonian is

H^=H^0+H^'(t)(9.80).

(a) Generalize Equation 9.6 to read

Ψ(t)=ca(t)ψaeiEat/+cb(t)ψbeiEbt/(9.81).

and show that

c˙m=incnHmn'ei(EmEn)t/ (9.82).

Where

Hmn'ψm|H^'|ψn (9.83).

(b) If the system starts out in the state ψN, show that (in first-order perturbation theory)

cN(t)1i0tHNN'(t')dt'(9.84).

and

cm(t)i0tHmN'(t')ei(EmEN)t'/dt',   (mN)(9.85).

(c) For example, supposeH^'is constant (except that it was turned on at t = 0 , and switched off again at some later time . Find the probability of transition from state N to state M (MN),as a function of T. Answer:

4|HMN'|2sin2[(ENEM)T/2](ENEM)2 (9.86).

(d) Now supposeH^'is a sinusoidal function of timeH^'=Vcos(ωt): Making the usual assumptions, show that transitions occur only to states with energy EM=EN±, and the transition probability is

PNM=|VMN|2sin2[(ENEM±ω)T/2](ENEM±ω)2 (9.87).

(e) Suppose a multi-level system is immersed in incoherent electromagnetic radiation. Using Section 9.2.3 as a guide, show that the transition rate for stimulated emission is given by the same formula (Equation 9.47) as for a two-level system.

Rba=π3ϵ02||2ρ(ω0)Rb (9.47).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free