Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A hydrogen atom is placed in a (time-dependent) electric fieldE=E(t)k.calculateallfourmatrixelementsHij,oftheperturbationH,=eEzbetween the ground state (n = 1 ) the (quadruply degenerate) first excited states (n = 2 ) . Also showthatHii,=0 for all five states. Note: There is only one integral to be done here, if you exploit oddness with respect to z; only one of the n = 2 states is “accessible” from the ground state by a perturbation of this form, and therefore the system functions as a two-state configuration—assuming transitions to higher excited states can be ignored.

Short Answer

Expert verified

H100,210,=-0.7449eEa.

Step by step solution

01

Concept of time varying electric field

Consider a hydrogen atom placed in a time-varying electric field:

E=E(t)z

Where E(t) is some arbitrary function of time. The spatial wave functions formula is given by:

ψn/m=RnlYlm

02

Calculating all for matrix elements and showing that Hii,=0

ψn/m=Rnym.FromTables4.3and4.7:

ψ100=1πa3e-r/a;ψ200=18'πa31-r2ae-r/2aψ210=132πa3rae-r/2acosθ;ψ21±1=±164πa3rae-r/2asinθe±iϕ

Butrcosθ=zandrsinθe±=rsincosϕ±isinϕ=rsinθcosϕ±irsinθsinϕ.soψ2isanevenfunctionofzinallcases,andhencezψ2dxdydz,soHii,=0moreover,ψ100iseveninz,andsoareψ200,ψ211,andψ21-1,soHij,=0forallexceptH100,210,=eE1πa3132πa31ae-r/ae-r/2az2d3r=eE42πa4e-3r/2ar2cos2θr2sinθdrdθ.=eE42πa40r4e-3r/2adr0πcos2θsinθdθ02π=eE42πa44!2a35232π=28352or0:7449eEa.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

You could derive the spontaneous emission rate (Equation 11.63) without the detour through Einstein’s A and B coefficients if you knew the ground state energy density of the electromagnetic field P0(ω)for then it would simply be a case of stimulated emission (Equation 11.54). To do this honestly would require quantum electrodynamics, but if you are prepared to believe that the ground state consists of one photon in each classical mode, then the derivation is very simple:

(a) Replace Equation 5.111by localid="1658381580036" N0=dkand deduce P0(ω) (Presumably this formula breaks down at high frequency, else the total "vacuum energy" would be infinite ... but that's a story for a different day.)

(b) Use your result, together with Equation 9.47, to obtain the spontaneous emission rate. Compare Equation 9.56.

Show that the spontaneous emission rate (Equation 9.56) for a transition from n,lton',l' in hydrogen is

e2ω2l23πo0hc3˙×{l+12l+1ifl'=l+1l2l-1ifl'=l-1

where

l=0r3Rnl(r)Rn'J'(r)dr

(The atom starts out with a specific value of m, and it goes toamyof the state’s mconsistent with the selection rules:m'=m+1,m or m -1 . Notice that the answer is independent of m .) Hint: First calculate all the nonzero matrix elements of x,y,and z between role="math" localid="1658313179553" |n|m>andn'l'm'>for the case . From these, determine the quantity

|n'.1+1.m+1rn|m|2+|n'.1+1,mr|nm|2+|n'.1+1,m-1r|nm|2

Then do the same forl'=l-1.

Develop time-dependent perturbation theory for a multi-level system, starting with the generalization of Equations 9.1 and 9.2:

H^0ψn=Enψn,   ψnψm=δnm (9.79)

At time t = 0 we turn on a perturbation H'(t)so that the total Hamiltonian is

H^=H^0+H^'(t)(9.80).

(a) Generalize Equation 9.6 to read

Ψ(t)=ca(t)ψaeiEat/+cb(t)ψbeiEbt/(9.81).

and show that

c˙m=incnHmn'ei(EmEn)t/ (9.82).

Where

Hmn'ψm|H^'|ψn (9.83).

(b) If the system starts out in the state ψN, show that (in first-order perturbation theory)

cN(t)1i0tHNN'(t')dt'(9.84).

and

cm(t)i0tHmN'(t')ei(EmEN)t'/dt',   (mN)(9.85).

(c) For example, supposeH^'is constant (except that it was turned on at t = 0 , and switched off again at some later time . Find the probability of transition from state N to state M (MN),as a function of T. Answer:

4|HMN'|2sin2[(ENEM)T/2](ENEM)2 (9.86).

(d) Now supposeH^'is a sinusoidal function of timeH^'=Vcos(ωt): Making the usual assumptions, show that transitions occur only to states with energy EM=EN±, and the transition probability is

PNM=|VMN|2sin2[(ENEM±ω)T/2](ENEM±ω)2 (9.87).

(e) Suppose a multi-level system is immersed in incoherent electromagnetic radiation. Using Section 9.2.3 as a guide, show that the transition rate for stimulated emission is given by the same formula (Equation 9.47) as for a two-level system.

Rba=π3ϵ02||2ρ(ω0)Rb (9.47).

Solve Equation 9.13 for the case of a time-independent perturbation, assumingthatandcheck that

. Comment: Ostensibly, this system oscillates between “” Doesn’t this contradict my general assertion that no transitions occur for time-independent perturbations? No, but the reason is rather subtle: In this are not, and never were, Eigen states of the Hamiltonian—a measurement of the energy never yields. In time-dependent perturbation theory we typically contemplate turning on the perturbation for a while, and then turning it off again, in order to examine the system. At the beginning, and at the end,are Eigen states of the exact Hamiltonian, and only in this context does it make sense to say that the system underwent a transition from one to the other. For the present problem, then, assume that the perturbation was turned on at time t = 0, and off again at time T —this doesn’t affect the calculations, but it allows for a more sensible interpretation of the result.

ca=-ihHabeigtcb,cb=-ihHbaeigtca …(9.13).

For the examples inProblem 11.24(c) and (d), calculate cm(t)to first order. Check the normalization condition:

m|cmt|2=1,

and comment on any discrepancy. Suppose you wanted to calculate the probability of remaining in the original state ψN ; would you do better to use |cNt|2,or1-mN|cmt|2 ?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free