Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

An electron in the n=3,l=0,m=0state of hydrogen decays by a sequence of (electric dipole) transitions to the ground state.

(a) What decay routes are open to it? Specify them in the following way:

|300|nlm|n'l'm'|100.

(b) If you had a bottle full of atoms in this state, what fraction of them would decay via each route?

(c) What is the lifetime of this state? Hint: Once it’s made the first transition, it’s no longer in the state |300\rangle∣300⟩, so only the first step in each sequence is relevant in computing the lifetime.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a)(|300|200and|300|1100)

(b)|21±1|r|300|2=2|21±1|x|300|2=K2/3

(c)  τ=1R=1.58×107s

Step by step solution

01

(a) Specifying the decay routes.

(|300|200and|300|1100violateΔl=±1rule.)

02

(b) Fraction of decay via each route. 

From Eq. 11.76:

{ifm'=m,   thenn'l'm'|x|nlm=n'l'm'|y|nlm=0ifm'=m±1,thenn'l'm'|x|nlm=±i(n'l'm'|y|nlmandn'l'm'|z|nlm=0(11.76).

210|r|300=210|z|300k^21±1|r|300=21±1|x|300i^+21±1|y|300j^

±21±1|x|300=i21±1|y|.Thus|210|r|300|2=|210|z|300|2   and   |21±1|r|300|2=2|21±1|x|300|2

So there are really just two matrix elements to calculate.

ψ21m=R21Y1m,   ψ300=R30Y00.From Table 4.3:

Y10Y00cosθsinθdθdϕ=34π14π0πcos2θsinθdθ02πdϕ=34π(cos3θ3)|0π(2π)=32(23)=13

(Y1±1)*Y00sin2θcosϕdθdϕ=38π14π0πsin3θdθ02πcosϕeiϕdϕ=14π32(43)[02πcos2ϕdϕi02πcosϕsinϕdϕ]=1π6(π0)=16

From Table 4.7:

K0R21R30r3dr=124a3/2227a3/20raer/2a[123ra+227(ra)2]er/3ar3dr=192a3a40(123u+227u2)u4e5u/6du=a92[4!(65)5235!(65)6+2276!(65)7]

=a924!6556(52365+22763)=a924!6556=2734562a

So,

21±1|x|300=R21(Y1±1)*(rsinθcosϕ)R30Y00r2sinθdrdθdϕ=K(16)

210|z|300=R21Y10(rcosθ)R30Y00r2sinθdrdθdϕ=K(13)

|210|r|300|2=|210|z|300|2=K2/3;|21±1|r|300|2=2|21±1|x|300|2=K2/3

Evidently the three transition rates are equal, and hence 1/3 go by each route.

03

(c) Lifetime of the state

For each mode,

A=ω3e2|r|23πϵ0c3here,ω=E3E2=1(E19E14)=536E1,

so the total decay rate is

R=3(536E1)3e23πϵ0c313(2734562a)2=6(25)9(E1mc2)2(ca)

=6(25)9(13.60.511×106)2(3×1080.529×1010)/s=6.32×106/sτ=1R=1.58×107s

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The first term in Equation 9.25 comes from the eiωt/2, and the second from e-iωt/2.. Thus dropping the first term is formally equivalent to writing H^=(V/2)e-iωt, which is to say,

cbl-ihvba0tcos(ωt')eiω0t'dt'=-iVba2h0tej(ω0+ω)t'+ej(ω0-ω)t'dt'=--iVba2hej(ω0+ω)t'-1ω0+ω+ej(ω0-ω)t'-1ω0-ω(9.25).Hba'=Vba2e-iωt,Hab'=Vab2eiωt(9.29).

(The latter is required to make the Hamiltonian matrix hermitian—or, if you prefer, to pick out the dominant term in the formula analogous to Equation 9.25 forca(t). ) Rabi noticed that if you make this so-called rotating wave approximation at the beginning of the calculation, Equation 9.13 can be solved exactly, with no need for perturbation theory, and no assumption about the strength of the field.

c.a=-ihHab'e-iω0tcb,c.b=-ihHba'e-iω0tca,

(a) Solve Equation 9.13 in the rotating wave approximation (Equation 9.29), for the usual initial conditions: ca(0)=1,cb(0)=0. Express your results (ca(t)andcb(t))in terms of the Rabi flopping frequency,

ωr=12(ω-ω0)2+(Vab/h)2 (9.30).

(b) Determine the transition probability,Pab(t), and show that it never exceeds 1. Confirm that.

ca(t)2+cb(t)2=1.

(c) Check that Pab(t)reduces to the perturbation theory result (Equation 9.28) when the perturbation is “small,” and state precisely what small means in this context, as a constraint on V.

Pab(t)=cb(t)2Vab2hsin2ω0-ωt/2ω0-ω2(9.28)

(d) At what time does the system first return to its initial state?


You could derive the spontaneous emission rate (Equation 11.63) without the detour through Einstein’s A and B coefficients if you knew the ground state energy density of the electromagnetic field P0(ω)for then it would simply be a case of stimulated emission (Equation 11.54). To do this honestly would require quantum electrodynamics, but if you are prepared to believe that the ground state consists of one photon in each classical mode, then the derivation is very simple:

(a) Replace Equation 5.111by localid="1658381580036" N0=dkand deduce P0(ω) (Presumably this formula breaks down at high frequency, else the total "vacuum energy" would be infinite ... but that's a story for a different day.)

(b) Use your result, together with Equation 9.47, to obtain the spontaneous emission rate. Compare Equation 9.56.

A hydrogen atom is placed in a (time-dependent) electric fieldE=E(t)k.calculateallfourmatrixelementsHij,oftheperturbationH,=eEzbetween the ground state (n = 1 ) the (quadruply degenerate) first excited states (n = 2 ) . Also showthatHii,=0 for all five states. Note: There is only one integral to be done here, if you exploit oddness with respect to z; only one of the n = 2 states is “accessible” from the ground state by a perturbation of this form, and therefore the system functions as a two-state configuration—assuming transitions to higher excited states can be ignored.

Magnetic resonance. A spin-1/2 particle with gyromagnetic ratio γ at rest in a static magnetic fieldB0k^ precesses at the Larmor frequencyω0=γB0 (Example 4.3). Now we turn on a small transverse radiofrequency (rf) field,Brf[cos(ωt)ı^sin(ωt)j^]$, so that the total field is

role="math" localid="1659004119542" B=Brfcos(ωt)ı^Brfsin(ωt)j^+B0k^

(a) Construct the 2×2Hamiltonian matrix (Equation 4.158) for this system.

(b) If χ(t)=(a(t)b(t))is the spin state at time t, show that

a˙=i2(Ωeiωtb+ω0a):   b˙=i2(Ωeiωtaω0b)

where ΩγBrfis related to the strength of the rf field.

(c) Check that the general solution fora(t) andb(t) in terms of their initial valuesa0 andb0 is

role="math" localid="1659004637631" a(t)={a0cos(ω't/2)+iω'[a0(ω0ω)+b0Ω]sin(ω't/2)}eiωt/2b(t)={b0cos(ω't/2)+iω'[b0(ωω0)+a0Ω]sin(ω't/2)}eiωt/2

Where

ω'(ωω0)2+Ω2

(d) If the particle starts out with spin up (i.e. a0=1,b0=0,), find the probability of a transition to spin down, as a function of time. Answer:P(t)={Ω2/[(ωω0)2+Ω2]}sin2(ω't/2)

(e) Sketch the resonance curve,

role="math" localid="1659004767993" P(ω)=Ω2(ωω0)2+Ω2,

as a function of the driving frequencyω (for fixed ω0andΩ ). Note that the maximum occurs atω=ω0 Find the "full width at half maximum,"Δω

(f) Since ω0=γB0we can use the experimentally observed resonance to determine the magnetic dipole moment of the particle. In a nuclear magnetic resonance (nmr) experiment the factor of the proton is to be measured, using a static field of 10,000 gauss and an rf field of amplitude gauss. What will the resonant frequency be? (See Section for the magnetic moment of the proton.) Find the width of the resonance curve. (Give your answers in Hz.)

Solve Equation 9.13 for the case of a time-independent perturbation, assumingthatandcheck that

. Comment: Ostensibly, this system oscillates between “” Doesn’t this contradict my general assertion that no transitions occur for time-independent perturbations? No, but the reason is rather subtle: In this are not, and never were, Eigen states of the Hamiltonian—a measurement of the energy never yields. In time-dependent perturbation theory we typically contemplate turning on the perturbation for a while, and then turning it off again, in order to examine the system. At the beginning, and at the end,are Eigen states of the exact Hamiltonian, and only in this context does it make sense to say that the system underwent a transition from one to the other. For the present problem, then, assume that the perturbation was turned on at time t = 0, and off again at time T —this doesn’t affect the calculations, but it allows for a more sensible interpretation of the result.

ca=-ihHabeigtcb,cb=-ihHbaeigtca …(9.13).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free