Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

a) Use the variational principle to prove that first-order non-degenerate perturbation theory always overestimates (or at any rate never underestimates) the ground state energy.

(b) In view of (a), you would expect that the second-order correction to the ground state is always negative. Confirm that this is indeed the case, by examining Equation 6.15.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) As, ψgs0|H|ψgs0=E0+E1Egsthis proves thatfirst-order non-degenerate perturbation theory overestimates the ground state energy.

(b) The value of Egs2is definitely negative.

Step by step solution

01

Define the variational principle

The variational principle states that the ground-state energy is always smaller than or equal to the calculated with the trial wavefunction expectation value. We can approximate the wave function and energy of the ground-state by changing until the expectation value of is minimized.

Egsψgso|H|ψgso

WhereEgs is the energy in the ground state.

02

Prove the first-order perturbation

(a)

Solve the problem by using ψgso as our trial wave function as:

The variational principle tells us that:

Egsψgso|H|ψgso

Using the perturbation theory as well;

H=H0+H1

Where H1 is the first order perturbation, and His the unperturbed Hamiltonian.

Thus,

ψgs0|H|ψgs0=ψgs0|H|ψgs0+ψgs0|H1|ψgs0ψgs0|H|ψgs0=Egs0ψgs0|H1|ψgs0=Egs1

Then, ψgs0|H|ψgs0=E0+E1Egsand this proves the statement.

03

Define the value of second order correction.

(b)

The ground state's second order correction is denoted by Egs2 and from the second order perturbation theory,

Egs0=mn|ψm0|H1|ψgs0|2En0-Em0

Therefore;

role="math" localid="1658317167106" Egs0=mgs|ψm0|H1|ψgs0|2Egs0-Em0

Since role="math" localid="1658317017097" Egs0 is the ground state,

Then numerator is positive, but the denominator is negative as:

Egs0-Em0<0 for all m.

Thus, role="math" localid="1658316906095" |ψm0|H1|ψgs0|2, Egs2is definitely negative.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Evaluate Dand X(Equations and ). Check your answers against Equations 7.47and 7.48.

If the photon had a nonzero mass mγ0, the Coulomb potential would be replaced by the Yukawa potential,

V(r)=-e24π0e-μrr (8.73).

Whereμ=mγc/ . With a trial wave function of your own devising, estimate the binding energy of a “hydrogen” atom with this potential. Assumeμa1 , and give your answer correct to order(μa)2 .

Although the Schrödinger equation for helium itself cannot be solved exactly, there exist “helium-like” systems that do admit exact solutions. A simple example is “rubber-band helium,” in which the Coulomb forces are replaced by Hooke’s law forces:

H=-ħ22m(12+22)+12mω2|r1-r1|2(8.78).

(a) Show that the change of variables from

r1,r2,tor1,r2,tou12(r1+r2),v12(r1+r2) (8.79).

turns the Hamiltonian into two independent three-dimensional harmonic oscillators:

H=[-ħ2mu2+12mω2u2]+[-ħ2mu2+121-λmω2u2](8.80)

(b) What is the exact ground state energy for this system?

(c) If we didn’t know the exact solution, we might be inclined to apply the method of Section 7.2 to the Hamiltonian in its original form (Equation 7.78). Do so (but don’t bother with shielding). How does your result compare with the exact answer? Answer:(H)=3ħω(1-λ/4)a.

Find the best bound on Egsfor the delta-function potentialV(x)=-αδ(x), using a triangular trial function (Equation 7.10, only centered at the origin). This time a is an adjustable parameter.

As an explicit example of the method developed inProblem 7.15, consider an electron at rest in a uniform magnetic field B=B2kfor which the Hamiltonian is (Equation 4.158):

H=-γB (4.158).

H0=eBzmSz (7.57).

The eigenspinors, xaarelocalid="1655969802629" xb,andthecorrespondingenergies,EaandEb,aregiven in Equation 4.161. Now we turn on a perturbation, in the form of a uniform field in the x direction:

{x+,withenergyE+=-γB0ħ/2x-,withenergyE-=+-γB0ħ/2 (4.161).

H'=eBxmSx (7.58).

(a) Find the matrix elements of H′, and confirm that they have the structure of Equation 7.55. What is h?

(b) Using your result inProblem 7.15(b), find the new ground state energy, in second-order perturbation theory.

(c) Using your result inProblem 7.15(c), find the variation principle bound on the ground state energy.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free