Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Quantum dots. Consider a particle constrained to move in two dimensions in the cross-shaped region.The “arms” of the cross continue out to infinity. The potential is zero within the cross, and infinite in the shaded areas outside. Surprisingly, this configuration admits a positive-energy bound state

(a) Show that the lowest energy that can propagate off to infinity is

Ethreshold=π2h28ma2

any solution with energy less than that has to be a bound state. Hint: Go way out one arm (say xa), and solve the Schrödinger equation by separation of variables; if the wave function propagates out to infinity, the dependence on x must take the formexp(ikxx)withkx>0

(b) Now use the variation principle to show that the ground state has energy less than Ethreshold. Use the following trial wave function (suggested by Jim Mc Tavish):

ψ(x,y)=A{cos(πx/2a)+cos(πy/2a)e-αxaandyacos(πx/2a)e-αy/axaandy>acos(πy/2a)e-αy/ax.aandya0elsewhere

Normalize it to determine A, and calculate the expectation value of H.
Answer:

<H>=h2ma2[π28-1-(α/4)1+(8/π2)+(1/2α)]

Now minimize with respect to α, and show that the result is less thanEthreshold. Hint: Take full advantage of the symmetry of the problem— you only need to integrate over 1/8 of the open region, since the other seven integrals will be the same. Note however that whereas the trial wave function is continuous, its derivatives are not—there are “roof-lines” at the joins, and you will need to exploit the technique of Example 8.3.

Short Answer

Expert verified

aEmin=h2π28ma2=1.234h2ma2bHmin=1.058h2ma2

Step by step solution

01

(a) Showing the lowest energy that can propagate off to infinity

The lowest Energy that can propagate off to infinity

-h22m2ψx2+2ψy2=Eψ

Let

localid="1658386907422" ψ(x,y)=X(x)Y(y).Yd2Xdx2+Xd2Ydy2=-2mEh2XY;1Xd2Xdx2+1Yd2Ydy2=-2mEh2d2Xdx2=-Kx2X;d2Ydy2=-ky2Ykx2+ky2=2mEh2

The general solution to the y equation is Y(y)=Acoskyy+Bsinkyy; the boundary conditions localid="1658387119190" Y(±a)=0yieldky=nπ2awith minimum π2a.

[Note that ky2has to be positive, or you cannot meet the boundary conditions at all.]

So Eh22mkx2+π24a2.

For a traveling wave kx2has to be positive. Conclusion: Any solution with E<π2h28ma2will be a bound state.

02

(a) The ground state has energy less than Ethreshold

Here’s a graph of ψ(x,y):

a=0.90.9gx-,y-=Piecewise(Cosπx/2+Cosπy/2)e^(-a),Absx<1Absy<1,(cosπx/2e^(-aAbsy),Absx<1Absy>1,Plot3D[gx,y,x,-4,4,y,-4,4,PlotRangeθ,085].

It has roof-lines along the edges of the central square, as you can see by plotting g[x; 0.5] across the kink:

jx-:=gx,.5:=gx,.5.Plotjx,x,.8,1,2].

To normalize, we integrate ψ(x,y)22 over regions I and II (in the figure), and multiply by 8.

lii=A2x-ay-0acos2πy2ae-2αx/adxdy.li=12A2x-ay-0acosπx2a+cosπy2a2e-2αdxdy.=12A2e-2α20acos2πx2adx0ady+20acosπx2adx0acosπx2ady.=A2e-2αa2a+2aπsinπx2a0a2=A2a22e-2α1+8π2.

Normalizing:

1=8ll+ln=8A2a2e-2α14α+121+8π2=4A2a2e-2α1+8π2+12αSo,A2=e2α4a21+8π2+12α.

Next, ignoring the roof-lines for the moment, we calculate Ha=-8h22mJl+Jll, where

Jii=A2x-ay-0acosπy2ae-αx/a2x2+2y2cosπy2ae-αx/adxdy=αa2-π2a2lll=A214αα2-π24e-2α.Jl=12A2x-ay-0acosπx2a+cosπy2ae-α2x2+2y2cosπx2a+cosπy2ae-αdxdy=-π24a2ll=-A21+π28e-2α

So far them,

Ha=-8h22m-A21+π28e-2α+A214αα2+π24e-2α=h22mA2e-2α8+π2-2α+π22α

Now the roof-lines, along the four sides of the central square: Hb=-8h22mJlll, where

Jlll=x=a-a+o˙y=0aψ(x,y)2x2ψ(x,y)dxdy.=Ay=0aψ(a,y)xcosπy2ae-αx/ax=a-xcosπy2ae-αx=ady.=A2y=0acosπy2ae-α-αacosπy2ae-α+π2asinπ2e-αdy.=A21ae-2α0aπ2cosπy2a-αcos2πy2ady=A2e-2α1-α2.Hb=-8h22mA2e-2α1-α2S0,=h22mA2e-2α4(α-2)

Putting it all together,

H=Ha+Hb=h22mA2e-2α8+π2-2α+π22α+h22mA2e-2α(4α-8)=h2ma2π28-1-α/41+(8/π2)+(1/2α)

Minimizing:

dHdα=0ddα4-α1+(8/π2)+(1/2α)2=0-11+(8/π2)+(1/2α)-4-α(1+(8/π2)+(1/2α))2-12α2;1+(8/π2)+(1/2α)-4-α2α2=0;α21+8π2+α-2;α=1±1+81+(8/π2)21+(8/π2)=-1+9+(8/π)221+(8/π2).

(Note that α must be positive)

03

(b) The ground state

Putting all together.

H=-2h2αe-2α3mA2+2h2e-2αmαA2+2h2e-2αmA2+2h2(2α-1)e-2α3mA2n=2h2e-2α3mα(α2+2α+3)A2=3h2ma2α2+2α+36+11αdHdα=03h2ma2(2α+2).(6+11α)-11.(α2+2α+3)(6+11α)2=0(2α+2).(6+11α)-11.(α2+2α+3)=012α+22α2+12+22α-11α2-22α-33=011α2+12α-21=0α1,2=-12±144+92422

Because αhas to be positive, we have Now, minimum of expected value of Hamiltonian is:

Hmin=h2ma2-3(α2+2α+3)6+11α=1.058h2ma2

Therefore

a)Ethreshold=π28h2ma2=1.2337h2ma2b)Hmin=1.058h2ma2,whichislessthanEmin

That means that particle won't escape to infinity.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Although the Schrödinger equation for helium itself cannot be solved exactly, there exist “helium-like” systems that do admit exact solutions. A simple example is “rubber-band helium,” in which the Coulomb forces are replaced by Hooke’s law forces:

H=-ħ22m(12+22)+12mω2|r1-r1|2(8.78).

(a) Show that the change of variables from

r1,r2,tor1,r2,tou12(r1+r2),v12(r1+r2) (8.79).

turns the Hamiltonian into two independent three-dimensional harmonic oscillators:

H=[-ħ2mu2+12mω2u2]+[-ħ2mu2+121-λmω2u2](8.80)

(b) What is the exact ground state energy for this system?

(c) If we didn’t know the exact solution, we might be inclined to apply the method of Section 7.2 to the Hamiltonian in its original form (Equation 7.78). Do so (but don’t bother with shielding). How does your result compare with the exact answer? Answer:(H)=3ħω(1-λ/4)a.

Find the lowest bound on the ground state of hydrogen you can get using a Gaussian trial wave function

ψ(r)=Ae-br2,

where A is determined by normalization and b is an adjustable parameter. Answer-11.5eV

InProblem 7.7we found that the trial wave function with shielding (Equation 7.27), which worked well for helium, is inadequate to confirm the existence of a bound state for the negative hydrogen ion.

ψ1(r1,r2)z3πa3e-z(r1+r2)/a (7.27)

Chandrasekhar used a trial wave function of the form

ψ(r1,r2)A[ψ1(r1)ψ2(r2)+ψ2(r1)ψ1(r2)] (7.62).

Where

ψ1(r)z13πa3e-z1/a,ψ1(r)z23πa3e-z2/a,(7.63)

In effect, he allowed two different shielding factors, suggesting that one electron is relatively close to the nucleus, and the other is farther out. (Because electrons are identical particles, the spatial wave function must be symmetries with respect to interchange. The spin state—which is irrelevant to the calculation—is evidently anti symmetric.) Show that by astute choice of the adjustable parameters Z1and Z2you can get<H>less than -13.6.

Answer: :<H>=E1x6+y6(-x8+2x7+12x6y2-12x5y2-18x3y4+118xy6-12y8).

Wherexz1+z2.y2z1z2Chandrasekhar usedZ1=1.039

(Since this is larger than 1, the motivating interpretation as an effective nuclear charge cannot be sustained, but never mindit’s still an acceptable trial wave function) andZ2=0.283.

(a) GeneralizeProblem 7.2, using the trial wave function

ψ(x)=A(x2+b2)n,

For arbitrary n. Partial answer: The best value of b is given by

localid="1658300238725" b2=hmω[n(4n-1)(4n-3)2(2n+1)]1/2

(b) Find the least upper bound on the first excited state of the harmonic oscillator using a trial function of the form

ψ(x)=Bx(x2+b2)n.

Partial answer: The best value of b is given by

localid="1658300555415" b2=hmω[n(4n-5)(4n-3)2(2n+1)]1/2.

(c) Notice that the bounds approach the exact energies as n →∞. Why is that? Hint: Plot the trial wave functions for n = 2 , n = 3 , and n = 4, and compare them with the true wave functions (Equations 2.59 and 2.62). To do it analytically, start with the identity

ez=limn(1+zn)nψ0(x)=(mωπh)1/4e-mω2hx2 (2.59).

ψ1(x)=A1a^+ψ0=A12hmω(-hddx+mωx)(mωπh)1/4e-mω2hx2ψ1(x)=A1(mωπh)1/42mωhxe-mω2hx2(2.62).

Suppose we used a minus sign in our trial wave function (Equation 7.37):ψ=A[ψ0(r1)-ψ0(r2)]): Without doing any new integrals, find F(x) (the analog to Equation ) for this case, and construct the graph. Show that there is no evidence of bonding. (Since the variational principle only gives an upper bound, this doesn't prove that bonding cannot occur for such a state, but it certainly doesn't look promising). Comment: Actually, any function of the form ψ=A[ψ0(r1)+eiϕψ0(r2)]has the desired property that the electron is equally likely to be associated with either proton. However, since the Hamiltonian (Equation 7.35 ) is invariant under the interchange P:r1r2 , its eigen functions can be chosen to be simultaneously eigen functions of P . The plus sign (Equation 7.37) goes with the eigenvalue +1 , and the minus sign (Equation 7.52 ) with the eigenvalue -1 ; nothing is to be gained by considering the ostensibly more general case (Equation 7.53), though you're welcome to try it, if you're interested.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free