Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The fundamental problem in harnessing nuclear fusion is getting the two particles (say, two deuterons) close enough together for the attractive (but short-range) nuclear force to overcome the Coulomb repulsion. The “bulldozer” method is to heat the particles up to fantastic temperatures and allow the random collisions to bring them together. A more exotic proposal is muon catalysis, in which we construct a “hydrogen molecule ion,” only with deuterons in place of protons, and a muon in place of the electron. Predict the equilibrium separation distance between the deuterons in such a structure, and explain why muons are superior to electrons for this purpose.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The equilibrium separation distance between deuterons isR=6.73×10-13m.

Step by step solution

01

The equilibrium separation distance between the deuterons

The equilibrium separation distance between the deuterons butmemrthe reduced mass of themuon:

role="math" localid="1658383790270" mr=mμmdmμ+md=mμ2mpmμ+2mp=mμ1+mμ/2mp.mμ=207me,

so

1+mμmp=1+20729.11×10-311.67×10-27=1.056;mr=207me1.056=196me

02

Explaining why muons are superior to electrons

This shrinks the muonic \Bohr radius” down by a factor of nearly 200. but nowis the ground state energy of the muonic atom. The potential energy associated with the deuteron-deuteron repulsion is the same as, and since the productis independent of mass, it doesn’t matter whether we write it using the electron values or the muon values. the entire molecule shrinks by that same factor of 196. The equilibrium separation for the electron case was 2.493 a (Problem 7.10),Therefore, The general equation of

R=2.4931960.529×10-10m=6.73×10-10m

Thus the equilibrium separation distance between deuterons is R=6.73×10-10m.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Quantum dots. Consider a particle constrained to move in two dimensions in the cross-shaped region.The “arms” of the cross continue out to infinity. The potential is zero within the cross, and infinite in the shaded areas outside. Surprisingly, this configuration admits a positive-energy bound state

(a) Show that the lowest energy that can propagate off to infinity is

Ethreshold=π2h28ma2

any solution with energy less than that has to be a bound state. Hint: Go way out one arm (say xa), and solve the Schrödinger equation by separation of variables; if the wave function propagates out to infinity, the dependence on x must take the formexp(ikxx)withkx>0

(b) Now use the variation principle to show that the ground state has energy less than Ethreshold. Use the following trial wave function (suggested by Jim Mc Tavish):

ψ(x,y)=A{cos(πx/2a)+cos(πy/2a)e-αxaandyacos(πx/2a)e-αy/axaandy>acos(πy/2a)e-αy/ax.aandya0elsewhere

Normalize it to determine A, and calculate the expectation value of H.
Answer:

<H>=h2ma2[π28-1-(α/4)1+(8/π2)+(1/2α)]

Now minimize with respect to α, and show that the result is less thanEthreshold. Hint: Take full advantage of the symmetry of the problem— you only need to integrate over 1/8 of the open region, since the other seven integrals will be the same. Note however that whereas the trial wave function is continuous, its derivatives are not—there are “roof-lines” at the joins, and you will need to exploit the technique of Example 8.3.

a) Use the variational principle to prove that first-order non-degenerate perturbation theory always overestimates (or at any rate never underestimates) the ground state energy.

(b) In view of (a), you would expect that the second-order correction to the ground state is always negative. Confirm that this is indeed the case, by examining Equation 6.15.

Evaluate Dand X(Equations and ). Check your answers against Equations 7.47and 7.48.

(a) GeneralizeProblem 7.2, using the trial wave function

ψ(x)=A(x2+b2)n,

For arbitrary n. Partial answer: The best value of b is given by

localid="1658300238725" b2=hmω[n(4n-1)(4n-3)2(2n+1)]1/2

(b) Find the least upper bound on the first excited state of the harmonic oscillator using a trial function of the form

ψ(x)=Bx(x2+b2)n.

Partial answer: The best value of b is given by

localid="1658300555415" b2=hmω[n(4n-5)(4n-3)2(2n+1)]1/2.

(c) Notice that the bounds approach the exact energies as n →∞. Why is that? Hint: Plot the trial wave functions for n = 2 , n = 3 , and n = 4, and compare them with the true wave functions (Equations 2.59 and 2.62). To do it analytically, start with the identity

ez=limn(1+zn)nψ0(x)=(mωπh)1/4e-mω2hx2 (2.59).

ψ1(x)=A1a^+ψ0=A12hmω(-hddx+mωx)(mωπh)1/4e-mω2hx2ψ1(x)=A1(mωπh)1/42mωhxe-mω2hx2(2.62).

Use a gaussian trial function (Equation 7.2) to obtain the lowest upper bound you can on the ground state energy of (a) the linear potential V(x)=α|x| (b) the quartic potential:V(x)=αx4

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free