Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

(a) GeneralizeProblem 7.2, using the trial wave function

ψ(x)=A(x2+b2)n,

For arbitrary n. Partial answer: The best value of b is given by

localid="1658300238725" b2=hmω[n(4n-1)(4n-3)2(2n+1)]1/2

(b) Find the least upper bound on the first excited state of the harmonic oscillator using a trial function of the form

ψ(x)=Bx(x2+b2)n.

Partial answer: The best value of b is given by

localid="1658300555415" b2=hmω[n(4n-5)(4n-3)2(2n+1)]1/2.

(c) Notice that the bounds approach the exact energies as n →∞. Why is that? Hint: Plot the trial wave functions for n = 2 , n = 3 , and n = 4, and compare them with the true wave functions (Equations 2.59 and 2.62). To do it analytically, start with the identity

ez=limn(1+zn)nψ0(x)=(mωπh)1/4e-mω2hx2 (2.59).

ψ1(x)=A1a^+ψ0=A12hmω(-hddx+mωx)(mωπh)1/4e-mω2hx2ψ1(x)=A1(mωπh)1/42mωhxe-mω2hx2(2.62).

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a)Hmin12hω8n2-2n8n2-2n-3>12hω(b)Hmin32hω8n2-6n8n2-6n-3>32hω(c)ψ0(x)=mωπh1/4ne-mω2hx2

Step by step solution

01

Given.

We will need the following integral repeatedly:

ψ(x)=A(x2+b2)n,ψ(x)=Bx(x2+b2)n.

02

(a) Generalizing using the trial wave function

1=-ψ2dx=2A201(x2+b2)2ndx=A2b4n-1Γ12Γ4n-12Γ(2n)A=b4n-1(2n)Γ12Γ4n-12

T=-h22m-ψd2xdx2dx=-h22mA2-1(x2+b2)nddx-2nx(x2+b2)n+1dx

=nh2mA2-1(x2+b2)n1(x2+b2)n+1-2(n+1)x2(x2+b2)n+2dx=2nh2mA201(x2+b2)2n+1dx-2(n+1)0x2(x2+b2)2n+2dx

role="math" localid="1658310221074" =2nh2mb4n-1Γ(2n)Γ12Γ4n-1212b4n+1Γ12Γ4n+12Γ(2n+1)-2(n+1)2b4n-1Γ12Γ4n+12Γ(2n+2)=h24mb2n(4n-1)(2n+1).V=12mω2-ψ2x2dx=12mω22A20x2(x2+b2)2ndx.=mω2b4n-1Γ(2n)Γ12Γ4n-1212b4n-3Γ32Γ4n-32Γ(2n)=mω2b22(4n-3).H=h24mb2n(4n-1)(2n+1)+mω2b2(4n-3);Hb=-h22mb3n(4n-1)(2n+1)+mω2b2(4n-3)=0

b=hmωn(4n-1)(4n-3)2(2n+1)1/4.Hmin=h24mn(4n-1)(2n+1)mωh2(2n+1)n(4n-1)(4n-3)+mω22(4n-3)hmωn(4n-1)(4n-3)2(2n+1).=12hω2n(4n-1)(2n+1)(4n-3)=12hω8n2-2n8n2-2n-3>12hω

03

(b) Finding the least upper bound on the first excited state

H=3h24mb2n(4n-3)(2n+1)+32mω2b2(4n-5);Hb=-3h24mb2n(4n-3)(2n+1)+mω2b2(4n-5)=0b=hmωn(4n-3)(4n-5)2(2n+1)1/4.H=3h24mn(4n-3)(2n+1)mωh2(2n+1)n(4n-3)(4n-5)+32mω2(4n-5)hmωn(4n-3)(4n-5)2(2n+1).=32hω2n(4n-3)(2n+1)(4n-5)=32hω8n2-6n8n2-6n-5>32hω=32hω2n(4n-3)(2n+1)(4n-5)=32hω8n2-6n8n2-6n-5>32hω.1=2B20x2(x2+b2)2ndx=B2b4n-3Γ32Γ4n-32Γ(2n)B=b4n-3Γ(2n)Γ32Γ4n-32T=h22mB2-x(x2+b2)nddxx(x2+b2)n-2nx2(x2+b2)n+1dx=-h2B22m-x(x2+b2)n-2nx(x2+b2)n+1-4nx(x2+b2)n+1+4n(n+1)x3(x2+b2)n+2dx=4nh2B22m30x2(x2+b2)2n+1dx-2(n+1)0x2(x2+b2)2n+2dx=2nh2mb4n-3Γ(2n)Γ32Γ4n-3232b4n-1Γ32Γ4n-32Γ(2n+1)-2(2n+1)2b4n-1Γ32Γ4n-32Γ(2n+2)=3h24mb2n(4n-3)(2n+1).

V=12mω22B20x4(x2+b2)2ndx=12mω2b4n-3Γ(2n)Γ32Γ4n-3222b4n-5Γ52Γ4n-52Γ(2n)=32mω2b24n-5.

04

 Step4: (c) The bounds approach the exact energy as n→∞

Asn,ψ becomes more and more Gaussian”.

Analytically, for large nbhmωn.4n.4n2.2n1/4=2nhmω,so

(x2+b2)n=b2n1+x2b2nb2n1+mωx22hnnb2nemωx2/h

Meanwhile, using Sterling’s approximation in the formΓ(z+1)zze-z:

A2=b4n-1Γ(2n)Γ12Γ2n-12b4n-1π(2n-1)2n-1e-(2n-1)2n-322n-3/2e-(2n-3/2)b4n-1π1e2n-12n-32

localid="1658317073153" But1-12n1-34n1-12n1-34n1+34n-12n=1+14n;so2n-12n-322n-11+14nn211+1/4n(e1/4)2=e.=b4n-1πee2n=2nπb4n-1A2nπ1/4b2n-1/2

So,

ψ2nπ1/4b2n-1/21b2ne-mωx2/2h=2nπ1/4mω2nh1/4e-mωx2/2h=mωπh1/4e-mωx2/2h

Which is precisely the ground state of the harmonic oscillator (Eq. 2.60). So it’s no accident that we get the exact energies, in the limit n → ∞.

ψ0(x)=mωπh1/4e-mω2hx2.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

InProblem 7.7we found that the trial wave function with shielding (Equation 7.27), which worked well for helium, is inadequate to confirm the existence of a bound state for the negative hydrogen ion.

ψ1(r1,r2)z3πa3e-z(r1+r2)/a (7.27)

Chandrasekhar used a trial wave function of the form

ψ(r1,r2)A[ψ1(r1)ψ2(r2)+ψ2(r1)ψ1(r2)] (7.62).

Where

ψ1(r)z13πa3e-z1/a,ψ1(r)z23πa3e-z2/a,(7.63)

In effect, he allowed two different shielding factors, suggesting that one electron is relatively close to the nucleus, and the other is farther out. (Because electrons are identical particles, the spatial wave function must be symmetries with respect to interchange. The spin state—which is irrelevant to the calculation—is evidently anti symmetric.) Show that by astute choice of the adjustable parameters Z1and Z2you can get<H>less than -13.6.

Answer: :<H>=E1x6+y6(-x8+2x7+12x6y2-12x5y2-18x3y4+118xy6-12y8).

Wherexz1+z2.y2z1z2Chandrasekhar usedZ1=1.039

(Since this is larger than 1, the motivating interpretation as an effective nuclear charge cannot be sustained, but never mindit’s still an acceptable trial wave function) andZ2=0.283.

(a) Prove the following corollary to the variational principle: If ψψgs=0thenáHñEfe whereEfe is the energy of the first excited state. Comment: If we can find a trial function that is orthogonal to the exact ground state, we can get an upper bound on the first excited state. In general, it's difficult to be sure that is orthogonal toψgsi since (presumably) we don't know the latter. However, if the potentialV(x) is an even function of x, then the ground state is likewise even, and hence any odd trial function will automatically meet the condition for the corollary.

(b) Find the best bound on the first excited state of the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator using the trial functionψ(x)=Axe-bx2

Suppose we used a minus sign in our trial wave function (Equation 7.37):ψ=A[ψ0(r1)-ψ0(r2)]): Without doing any new integrals, find F(x) (the analog to Equation ) for this case, and construct the graph. Show that there is no evidence of bonding. (Since the variational principle only gives an upper bound, this doesn't prove that bonding cannot occur for such a state, but it certainly doesn't look promising). Comment: Actually, any function of the form ψ=A[ψ0(r1)+eiϕψ0(r2)]has the desired property that the electron is equally likely to be associated with either proton. However, since the Hamiltonian (Equation 7.35 ) is invariant under the interchange P:r1r2 , its eigen functions can be chosen to be simultaneously eigen functions of P . The plus sign (Equation 7.37) goes with the eigenvalue +1 , and the minus sign (Equation 7.52 ) with the eigenvalue -1 ; nothing is to be gained by considering the ostensibly more general case (Equation 7.53), though you're welcome to try it, if you're interested.

Although the Schrödinger equation for helium itself cannot be solved exactly, there exist “helium-like” systems that do admit exact solutions. A simple example is “rubber-band helium,” in which the Coulomb forces are replaced by Hooke’s law forces:

H=-ħ22m(12+22)+12mω2|r1-r1|2(8.78).

(a) Show that the change of variables from

r1,r2,tor1,r2,tou12(r1+r2),v12(r1+r2) (8.79).

turns the Hamiltonian into two independent three-dimensional harmonic oscillators:

H=[-ħ2mu2+12mω2u2]+[-ħ2mu2+121-λmω2u2](8.80)

(b) What is the exact ground state energy for this system?

(c) If we didn’t know the exact solution, we might be inclined to apply the method of Section 7.2 to the Hamiltonian in its original form (Equation 7.78). Do so (but don’t bother with shielding). How does your result compare with the exact answer? Answer:(H)=3ħω(1-λ/4)a.

Using Egs=-79.0eV for the ground state energy of helium, calculate the ionization energy (the energy required to remove just one electron). Hint: First calculate the ground state energy of the helium ion, He+, with a single electron orbiting the nucleus; then subtract the two energies.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free