Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

(a) Show that the set of all square-integrable functions is a vector space (refer to Section A.1 for the definition). Hint: The main problem is to show that the sum of two square-integrable functions is itself square-integrable. Use Equation 3.7. Is the set of all normalized functions a vector space?

(b) Show that the integral in Equation 3.6satisfies the conditions for an inner product (Section A.2).

Short Answer

Expert verified

a) Two square-integrable functions add up to a square-integrable function.

b) The integral in equation 3.6 satisfies the conditions for an inner product.

Step by step solution

01

Concept used

Equation 3.7 follows Schwarz inequality:

abfx*gxdxabfx2dxabgx2dx

Equation 3.6 define the inner product of two functions

fIg=abfx*gxdx

02

Given information from question

a)

Let fxand gxbe square-integrable, then we need to prove thathx=fx+gxis also square-integrable,

h2=f+g*f+g=f2+g2+f*g+g*f

The integration is,

h2dx=f2dx+g2dx+f*gdx+f*gdx*

since both fxandgxare square-integrable, then the first two terms are finite, using Schwarz inequality, we can write the third and the fourth integrals in terms of the first and the second integral:

abfx*gxdxabfx2dxabgx2dx

Therefore, the last two integrals are finite too. Hence h2dxis finite, therefore Two square-integrable functions add up to a square-integrable function. Now let ψxbe a vector with a value or component for every value of x . If a set of vectors meets two criteria, it can be called a vector space:

- If a vector ψ1xis in the set, then so is Aψxfor any complex scalar A

- If two vectors ψ1xand ψ2xare in the set, then so is their sum ψ1x+ψ2x

these two conditions can be combined by saying that if two vectors ψ1xand ψ2xare in the set, then so is their linear combination Aψ1x+Bψ2x , for any complex scalars and AWe can see from this definition that the above-mentioned collection of all normalizable functions is not a vector space. For example, if 1 is true for a vectorψx , then it is not true if we multiply ψxby any scalar Awhere A1.

03

The definition of an inner product of two vectors

b)

The definition of an inner product of two vectors requires that it satisfies three conditions:

g\f=f\g*f\f0andf\f=0ifandonlyif\f>=0h\(A\f+B\g>)=Ah\f+Bh\g

the first condition is trivial to prove, as:

g\f=abgx*fxdx=abfx*gxdx*=f\g*

For the second condition, we can use:

f\f=-f*xfxdx

To prove that f\f0and f\f=0if and only if \f>=0. For the third condition, we have:

h\A\f>+B\g)=-h*xAfx+h*xBgxdx=-h*xAfxdx+-h*xBgxdx=A-h*xfxdx+B-h*xgxdx=Ah\f+Bh\g

therefore, Equation 3.6's integral satisfies the requirements for an inner product.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose Ψ(x,0)=Ax2+a2.(-<x<)for constantsA and a.

(a) Determine A, by normalizingΨ(x,0)

(b) Find, and(at time).

(c) Find the momentum space wave functionΦ(p,0), and check that it is normalized.

(d) UseΦ(p,0)to calculatep,p2, andσp(at timet=0).

(e) Check the Heisenberg uncertainty principle for this state.

Test the energy-time uncertainty principle for the wave function in Problem2.5and the observable x, by calculatingσHσXandd<x>/dtexactly.

(a) Show that the sum of two hermitian operators is hermitian.

(b) SupposeQ^is hermitian, andαis a complex number. Under what condition (onα) islocalid="1655970881952" αQ^hermitian?

(c) When is the product of two hermitian operators hermitian?

(d) Show that the position operator (x^=x)and the hamiltonian operator

localid="1655971048829" H^=-h22md2dx2+V(x)are hermitian.

Sequential measurements. An operator A,representing observable A, has two normalized eigenstates ψ1and ψ2, with eigenvalues a1and a2, respectively. Operator B, representing observable B, has two normalized eigenstates ϕ1and ϕ2 , with eigenvalues b1and b2. The eigenstates are related by

ψ1=(3ϕ1+4ϕ2)/5,ψ2=(4ϕ1-3ϕ2)/5

(a) Observable Ais measured, and the value a1is obtained. What is the state of the system (immediately) after this measurement?

(b) If Bis now measured, what are the possible results, and what are their probabilities?

(c) Right after the measurement of B,Ais measured again. What is the probability of getting a1? (Note that the answer would be quite different if I had told you the outcome of the Bmeasurement.)

Consider the wave functionΨ(x,0)={12ei2πx/λ,-<x<0,

wherenis some positive integer. This function is purely sinusoidal (with wavelengthλ)on the interval-<x<, but it still carries a range of momenta, because the oscillations do not continue out to infinity. Find the momentum space wave functionΦ(p,0). Sketch the graphs of|Ψ(x,0)|2and|Φ(p,0)|2, and determine their widths,wxandwp(the distance between zeros on either side of the main peak). Note what happens to each width asn. Usingwxandwpas estimates ofxandp, check that the uncertainty principle is satisfied. Warning: If you try calculatingσp, you're in for a rude surprise. Can you diagnose the problem?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free