Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

(a) Check the divergence theorem for the function v1=r2r^, using as your volume the sphere of radius R, centred at the origin.

(b) Do the same for v2=(1r2)r^. (If the answer surprises you, look back at Prob. 1.16)

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The left and right side of the gauss divergence theorem is equal. Thus, the gauss divergence theorem is proved for v1=r2r^.

(b) The left and right side of the gauss divergence theorem is not equal. Thus, the gauss divergence theorem is not proved for v2=(1r2)r^.

Step by step solution

01

Verify the divergence theorem for function v1 (r)  in part (a)

The divergence of function v1(r) is defined as.v1=1r2r(r2vr).The function v1=r2r^. Now, find the divergence of v1=r2r^as:

.v1=1r2r(r2r^)=1r24r3=4r

The volume integral is taken over the surface of radius R. Now, compute the left part of gauss divergence theorem as:

.v1dv=02π0π0R4rr2sinθdrdθdϕ=4R240πsinθdθ02πdϕ=4πR2

Taking the area integration over the surface area of sphere of radius R, to calculate the right side of Gauss divergence theorem, the differential area becomes, da=r2sinθdθdϕ.

The right side of Gauss divergence theorem is computed as follows:

v1.da=(r2sinθdrdθdϕ)r2=02π0πr4sinθdθdϕ=4πR2

Thus, the left and right side of gauss divergence theorem are equal. Hence, the theorem is verified for the function in part (a).

02

Verify the divergence theorem for function v2=(1r2)r^ in part (b)

The function is given by v2=(1r2)r^. Now find the divergence of v2=(1r2)r^as:

.v1=1r2rr21r2r^=1r2r(1)=0

The volume integral is taken over the surface of radius R. As.v2=0, then the left part of gauss divergence theorem is computed as:(-v1)dv=0

Taking the area integration over the surface area of sphere of radius R, to calculate the right side of Gauss divergence theorem, then differential area becomes da=r2sinθdθdϕ.

The right side of Gauss divergence theorem is computed as follows:

v1.da=(r2sinθdrdθdϕ)(1r2)=02π0πsinθdθdϕ=4π

Thus, the left and right side of gauss divergence theorem are not obtained to be equal. Hence, the theorem is not verified for the function in part (b).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that f is a function of two variables (y and z) only. Show that the gradient f=(f/y)y^(f/z)z^transforms as a vector under rotations, Eq 1.29. [Hint: (f/y¯)=(f/y)(f/y¯)+(f/z)(z/y¯),and the analogous formula for f/z¯. We know that localid="1654595255202" y¯=ycosϕ+zsinϕand z=-ycos+zcos;”solve” these equations for y and z (as functions of localid="1654325243865" y¯and z(as functions of yand z), and compute the needed derivatives f/y,z/y, etc]

A uniform current density J=J0z^fills a slab straddling the yz plane, fromx=-atox=+a to . A magnetic dipolem=m0x is situated at the origin.

(a) Find the force on the dipole, using Eq. 6.3.

(b) Do the same for a dipole pointing in the direction:m=m0y .

(c) In the electrostatic case, the expressionsF=(p.E) and F=(p.)Eare equivalent (prove it), but this is not the case for the magnetic analogs (explain why). As an example, calculate(m.) for the configurations in (a) and (b).

Let rbe the separation vector from a fixed point (x',y',z')to the point localid="1654317524404" (x,y,z), and let r be its length. Show that

(a)localid="1654317730952" (r2)=2r

(b) (1/r)=-r/r2

(c) What is the general formula for localid="1654317981268" (rn)

Find the transformation matrix R that describes a rotation by 120° about an axis from the origin through the point (1, 1, 1). The rotation is clockwise as you look down the axis toward the origin.

Here are two cute checks of the fundamental theorems:

(a) Combine Corollary 2 to the gradient theorem with Stokes' theorem (v=T,in this case). Show that the result is consistent with what you already knew about second derivatives.

(b) Combine Corollary 2 to Stokes' theorem with the divergence theorem. Show that the result is consistent with what you already knew.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free