Chapter 10: Q10.19P (page 462)
Derive Eq. 10.70. First show that
Short Answer
The value of partial time derivative of the vector potential is
Chapter 10: Q10.19P (page 462)
Derive Eq. 10.70. First show that
The value of partial time derivative of the vector potential is
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeA particle of chargeq moves in a circle of radius a at constant angular velocity . (Assume that the circle lies in thexy plane, centered at the origin, and at time the charge is at role="math" localid="1653885001176" , on the positive x axis.) Find the Liénard-Wiechert potentials for points on the z-axis.
Question: Suppose a point charge q is constrained to move along the x axis. Show that the fields at points on the axis to the right of the charge are given by
(Do not assume is constant!) What are the fields on the axis to the left of the charge?
Suppose andlocalid="1654682194645" , wherelocalid="1654682226085" , and kare constants. Find E and B, and check that they satisfy Maxwell’s equations in a vacuum. What condition must you impose localid="1654682236104" on andk?
Confirm that the retarded potentials satisfy the Lorenz gauge condition.
Where denotes derivatives with respect to, and denotes derivatives with respect to. Next, noting that depends on both explicitly and through, whereas it depends on r only through, confirm that
,
Use this to calculate the divergence of (Eq. 10.26).]
A uniformly charged rod (length L, charge density ) slides out thex axis at constant speedv. At time t = 0 the back end passes the origin (so its position as a function of time is x = vt , while the front end is at x = vt + L ). Find the retarded scalar potential at the origin, as a function of time, for t > 0 . [First determine the retarded time t1 for the back end, the retarded time t2 for the front end, and the corresponding retarded positions x1 and x2 .] Is your answer consistent with the Liénard-Wiechert potential, in the point charge limit (L << vt , with )? Do not assume v << c .
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.