Another way to fill in the "missing link" in Fig. 5.48 is to look for a magnetostatic analog to Eq. 2.21. The obvious candidate would be
(a) Test this formula for the simplest possible case-uniform B (use the origin as your reference point). Is the result consistent with Prob. 5.25? You could cure this problem by throwing in a factor of localid="1657688349235" , but the flaw in this equation runs deeper.
(b) Show that is not independent of path, by calculating around the rectangular loop shown in Fig. 5.63.

Figure 5.63
As far as knowthe best one can do along these lines is the pair of equations
(i) localid="1657688931461"
(ii)
[Equation (i) amounts to selecting a radial path for the integral in Eq. 2.21; equation (ii) constitutes a more "symmetrical" solution to Prob. 5.31.]
(c) Use (ii) to find the vector potential for uniform B.
(d) Use (ii) to find the vector potential of an infinite straight wire carrying a steady current. Does (ii) automatically satisfy [Answer: ].