Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

“In a certain inertial frame S, the electric field E and the magnetic field B are neither parallel nor perpendicular, at a particular space-time point. Show that in a different inertial system S, moving relative to S with velocity v given by

v1+v2/c2=E×BB2+E2/c2

the fieldsEandBare parallel at that point. Is there a frame in which the two are perpendicular?

Short Answer

Expert verified

In a differential inertial system Smoving to relative to S with velocity v is

localid="1654598713572" v1+v2c2=E×BB2E2c2

and no, there can be no frame in which the two are perpendicular.

Step by step solution

01

Determine the coordinates of E and B in  frame:

Consider the axes so that E points lie in the z-direction, and B lies in the yz plane at an angle .

As E lies in the z-direction, write the coordinate of E in S frame.

E(0,0,E)

Similarly, asBlies in theyzdirection, write the coordinates atBinSframe.

B(0,Bcosϕ,Bcosϕ)

Write the coordinates of E in S frame.

localid="1654602630736" E=(0,-γvBsinϕ,γ(E+vBcosϕ))

Write the coordinates of B in Sframe.

B=o,yBcos+vc2E,yBcos

02

Prove that :

Using equation 12.109, write the complete set of transformation rules for an electric field.

E=ExE=yEy-vBcE=yEy+vBc

Similarly, write the complete set of transformation rules for a magnetic field.

Bx=BxBy=yBy+vc2EzBz=yBz-vc2Ey

Equate EyBy-ExBz:

Substitute localid="1654600759816" Bz=γBsinϕ,Ez=γ(E+vBcosϕ),By=yBcos+vc2Eand Ey=-γvBsinϕ in the above obtained expression.

Ey-vBxBy+vc2Ez=Ez-vByBz+vc2Ey-yvBsinyBcos+vc2E=yE+vBcosyBsin-vB2sin2=Bcos+vc2EE+vBcos0=EBcos+vB2cos2+vc2E2+v2c2EBcos

On further solving,

localid="1654602636380" EBcos+vB2+vc2E2+v2c2EBcos=0EBcos1+v2c2+vB2+vc2E2=0-EBcos1+v2E2=vB2+E2c2v1+v2E2=-EBcosB2-E2c2 …… (1)

Calculate the cross product of E×B.

localid="1654602416573" E×B=xyzooEoBcosBsinE×B=xo×Bcos-Esin-yBsin-E×o+zo×Bcos+o×oE×B=-EBcosx

Substitute E×Bfor -EBcosx in equation (1).

localid="1654602578114" v1+v2c2=E×BB2-E2c2

No, there can be no frame in which E is perpendicular to B because as the dot product of E and B is invariant and not equal to zero, it can’t be zero in Sframe.

Therefore, in a differential inertial system Smoving to relative to S with velocity v is

v1+v2c2=E×BB2-E2c2

and no, there can be no frame in which the two are perpendicular.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

As an illustration of the principle of relativity in classical mechanics, consider the following generic collision: In inertial frame S, particle A (massmA, velocityuB ) hits particle B (massmB, velocity uB). In the course of the collision some mass rubs off A and onto B, and we are left with particles C (massmc, velocityuc ) and D (mass mD, velocityuD ). Assume that momentum (p=mu)is conserved in S.

(a) Prove that momentum is also conserved in inertial frames¯, which moves with velocity relative to S. [Use Galileo’s velocity addition rule—this is an entirely classical calculation. What must you assume about mass?]

(b) Suppose the collision is elastic in S; show that it is also elastic in S¯.

Prove that the symmetry (or antisymmetry) of a tensor is preserved by Lorentz transformation (that is: if tμvis symmetric, show thatt¯μv is also symmetric, and likewise for antisymmetric).

(a) What’s the percent error introduced when you use Galileo’s rule, instead of Einstein’s, withvAB=5mi/handvBC=60mi/hand?

(b) Suppose you could run at half the speed of light down the corridor of a train going three-quarters the speed of light. What would your speed be relative to the ground?

(c) Prove, using Eq. 12.3, that ifvAB<candvBC<cthenvAC<cInterpret this result.


The parallel between rotations and Lorentz transformations is even more striking if we introduce the rapidity:

θ=tanh-1(vc) (12.34)

(a) Express the Lorentz transformation matrix(Eq. 12.24) in terms ofθ, and compare it to the rotation matrix (Eq. 1.29).

In some respects, rapidity is a more natural way to describe motion than velocity. For one thing, it ranges fromrole="math" localid="1654511220255" + to +, instead of -c to +c. More significantly, rapidities add, whereas velocities do not.

(b) Express the Einstein velocity addition law in terms of rapidity.

Calculate the threshold (minimum) momentum the pion must have in order for the process π+pK+to occur. The proton p is initially at rest. Use localid="1654341712179" mπc2=150,mkc2=500,mpc2=900,mc2=1200(all in MeV). [Hint: To formulate the threshold condition, examine the collision in the center-of-momentum frame (Prob. 12.31). Answer: 1133 MeV/c]

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free