Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Sophie Zabar, clairvoyante, cried out in pain at precisely the instant her twin brother, 500km away, hit his thumb with a hammer. A skeptical scientist observed both events (brother’s accident, Sophie’s cry) from an airplane traveling at1213c to the right (Fig. 12.19). Which event occurred first, according to the scientist? How much earlier was it, in seconds?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Sophie’s cry occurred 4×10-3s earlier with respect to scientist.

Step by step solution

01

Expression for the time dilation:

Write the expression for the time dilation.

Y=11-v2c2 …… (1)

Here, v is the velocity of an airplane, and c is the speed of light.

02

Determine the required time to occur an event:

Consider brother’s accident be at the origin time, i.e., zero in both the frames. With respect to frame S, Sophie’s co-ordinates will be,

x=500kmandt=0.

With respect to the scientist frame of reference, Sophie’s coordinates using Lorentz transformation equation will be,

t=γt+vxc2

Ast=0

Hence, the equation becomes,

t=-γvxc2 …… (2)

Substitute the value of v=1213cin equation (1).

γ=11-1213c2c2γ=1169-144169γ=125169γ=135

Substitute the value of y, v and x in equation (2).

t=-1351213c500km×103m1kmc2t=-12×105m3×108m/st=-4×10-3s

Therefore, Sophie’s cry occurred 4×10-3s earlier with respect to the scientist.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The natural relativistic generalization of the Abraham-Lorentz formula (Eq. 11.80) would seem to be

Kradμ=μ0q26Πcdαμdb

This is certainly a 4-vector, and it reduces to the Abraham-Lorentz formula in the non-relativistic limitvc .

(a) Show, nevertheless, that this is not a possible Minkowski force.

(b) Find a correction term that, when added to the right side, removes the objection you raised in (a), without affecting the 4-vector character of the formula or its non-relativistic limit.

An ideal magnetic dipole moment m is located at the origin of an inertial system S¯ that moves with speed v in the x direction with respect to inertial system S. InS¯ the vector potential is

A¯=μ04πm¯×r^¯r¯2

(Eq. 5.85), and the scalar potentialV¯ is zero.

(a) Find the scalar potential V in S.

(b) In the nonrelativistic limit, show that the scalar potential in S is that of an ideal electric dipole of magnitude

p=v×mc2

located atO¯ .

(a) Equation 12.40 defines proper velocity in terms of ordinary velocity. Invert that equation to get the formula for u in terms of η.

(b) What is the relation between proper velocity and rapidity (Eq. 12.34)? Assume the velocity is along the x direction, and find as a function of θ.

A particle of mass m collides elastically with an identical particle at rest. Classically, the outgoing trajectories always make an angle of 90°. Calculate this angle relativistically, in terms ofϕ , the scattering angle, and v, the speed, in the center-of-momentum frame.

Inertial system S moves at constant velocity v=βc(cosϕx^+sinϕy^)with respect to S. Their axes are parallel to one other, and their origins coincide at data-custom-editor="chemistry" t=t=0, as usual. Find the Lorentz transformation matrix A.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free