Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Earnshaw's theorem (Prob. 3.2) says that you cannot trap a charged

particle in an electrostatic field. Question:Could you trap a neutral (but polarizable) atom in an electrostatic field?

(a) Show that the force on the atom is F=12αE2

(b) The question becomes, therefore: Is it possible for E2 to have a local maximum (in a charge-free region)? In that case the force would push the atom back to its equilibrium position. Show that the answer is no. [Hint:Use Prob. 3.4(a).]

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) In the presence of an electrostatic field E, the force on an atom with polarizability αis12αE2.

(b) In a charge free region, E2 does not have local maxima.

Step by step solution

01

Given data

An atom of polarizability α is kept in an electrostatic field E.

02

Electrostatic force on an atom

The force on an atom in an electrostatic field is

F=a(E.)E.....(1)

Here, αis polarizability and Eis electrostatic field.

03

Derivation of force on an atom from an electrostatic field

The gradient of square of the electrostatic field is

E2=2E×(×E)+(E.)E

But the curl of an electrostatic field is zero. Hence

E2=2E.E

Substitute this in equation (1) and get

F=αE22

Thus, the force on the atom is 12αE2.

04

Local maxima of electrostatic field

If E2has a maxima, then there is a sphere about that maxima point Psuch that for all other points P'P on the sphere

E(p')<E(p)........(2)

In the absence of any charge inside the sphere, the average field over the surface is equal to the field on the maxima, that is,

14πR2Eda=E(P).......(3)

Here, is the radius of the sphere and is the infinitesimal area element.

From equations (2) and (3) it follows

14πR2Eda<14πR2E(p)daE(p)<14πR2E(p)daE(p)<E(p)

This is a contradiction and hence the electrostatic field does not have a maxima.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The Clausius-Mossotti equation (Prob. 4.41) tells you how to calculatethe susceptibility of a nonpolar substance, in terms of the atomic polariz-ability. The Langevin equation tells you how to calculate the susceptibility of apolar substance, in terms of the permanent molecular dipole moment p. Here's howit goes:

(a) The energy of a dipole in an external field E isu=-p·Ecosθ

(Eq. 4.6), whereθ is the usual polar angle, if we orient the z axis along E.

Statistical mechanics says that for a material in equilibrium at absolute temperature

T, the probability of a given molecule having energy u is proportional to

the Boltzmann factor,

exp(-u/kT)

The average energy of the dipoles is therefore

<u>=ue-(u/kt)e-(u/kT)

where =sinθdθdϕ, and the integration is over all orientations θ:0π;ϕ:02πUse this to show that the polarization of a substance

containing N molecules per unit volume is

P=Np[cothpE/kT-kT/pE] (4.73)

That's the Langevin formula. Sketch as a function ofPE/KT .

(b) Notice that for large fields/low temperatures, virtually all the molecules arelined up, and the material is nonlinear. Ordinarily, however, kT is much greaterthan p E. Show that in this regime the material is linear, and calculate its susceptibility,in terms of N, p, T, and k. Compute the susceptibility of water at 20°C,and compare the experimental value in Table 4.2. (The dipole moment of wateris 6.1×10-30C·m) This is rather far off, because we have again neglected thedistinction between E and Eelse· The agreement is better in low-density gases,for which the difference between E and Eelse is negligible. Try it for water vapor

at 100°C and 1 atm.

A short cylinder, of radius a and length L, carries a "frozen-in" uniform polarization P, parallel to its axis. Find the bound charge, and sketch the electric field (i) for La, (ii) for La, and (iii) for La. [This is known as a bar electret; it is the electrical analog to a bar magnet. In practice, only very special materials-barium titanate is the most "familiar" example-will hold a permanent electric polarization. That's why you can't buy electrets at the toy store.]

E2Find the field inside a sphere of linear dielectric material in an otherwise uniform electric field E0(Ex. 4.7) by the following method of successive approximations: First pretend the field inside is just E0, and use Eq. 4.30 to write down the resulting polarization P0. This polarization generates a field of its own, E1 (Ex. 4.2), which in turn modifies the polarization by an amount P1. which further changes the field by an amount E2, and so on. The resulting field is E0+E1+E2+.... . Sum the series, and compare your answer with Eq. 4.49.

A sphere of radius R carries a polarization

P(r)=kr,

Where k is a constant and r is the vector from the center.

(a) Calculate the bound charges σband ρb.

(b) Find the field inside and outside the sphere.

A hydrogen atom (with the Bohr radius of half an angstrom) is situated

between two metal plates 1 mm apart, which are connected to opposite terminals of a 500 V battery. What fraction of the atomic radius does the separation distance d amount to, roughly? Estimate the voltage you would need with this apparatus to ionize the atom. [Use the value of in Table 4.1. Moral:The displacements we're talking about are minute,even on an atomic scale.]

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free