Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Why are heat sinks with closely packed fins not suitable for natural convection heat transfer, although they increase the heat transfer surface area more?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: Heat sinks with closely packed fins are not suitable for natural convection heat transfer because their restricted fluid motion between the fins limits the buoyancy-driven flow and ultimately the overall heat transfer rate, even though they increase the heat transfer surface area. To maximize heat transfer efficiency in natural convection conditions, heat sinks should be designed with optimal fin spacing to allow for better fluid circulation and buoyancy-driven flow.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding heat transfer mechanisms

Heat transfer occurs through three mechanisms: conduction, convection, and radiation. In the context of heat sinks, we are mainly interested in convection, which is the transfer of heat between a solid surface and a fluid (like air) due to temperature differences. There are two types of convection: forced and natural convection.
02

Natural convection heat transfer

In natural convection, the fluid motion is induced by buoyancy forces that result from density differences due to temperature variations in the fluid. When a fluid, such as air, is heated by a heat sink, its density decreases, and the hot air rises, creating a buoyancy-driven flow around the heat sink. In contrast, forced convection involves an external force, such as a fan, that drives fluid flow over the heat sink.
03

Increasing heat transfer surface area with fins

Fins are added to heat sinks to increase the heat transfer surface area in contact with the fluid. The greater the surface area, the more heat can be transferred to the fluid. Closely packed fins indeed provide a larger surface area, which may seem beneficial for heat transfer.
04

The role of fin spacing in natural convection heat transfer

However, in the case of natural convection, closely packed fins are not suitable due to the restricted fluid motion between the fins. The buoyancy-driven flow responsible for natural convection relies on sufficient space for fluid to flow and circulate around the heat sink. When fins are closely packed, the narrow channels between them limit the fluid motion, and the boundary layer of the fluid near the heat sink surface remains stagnant for a longer period. This stagnant boundary layer acts as an insulating layer, reducing the overall heat transfer rate.
05

The importance of optimal fin spacing in heat sink design

To maximize the efficiency of natural convection heat transfer, it is crucial to design heat sinks with an optimal balance between increasing surface area with fins and providing sufficient space for fluid motion. Wider spacing between fins allows for better fluid circulation and buoyancy-driven flow, enhancing natural convection heat transfer despite the smaller surface area. In conclusion, heat sinks with closely packed fins are not suitable for natural convection heat transfer because their restricted fluid motion between fins limits the buoyancy-driven flow and ultimately the overall heat transfer rate, even though they increase the heat transfer surface area. Instead, heat sinks should be designed with optimal fin spacing to maximize heat transfer efficiency in natural convection conditions.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A spherical tank \((k=15 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K})\) with an inner diameter of \(3 \mathrm{~m}\) and a wall thickness of \(10 \mathrm{~mm}\) is used for storing hot liquid. The hot liquid inside the tank causes the inner surface temperature to be as high as \(100^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). To prevent thermal burns to the people working near the tank, the tank is covered with a \(7-\mathrm{cm}\)-thick layer of insulation $(k=0.15 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K})$, and the outer surface is painted to give an emissivity of \(0.35\). The tank is located in surroundings with air at $16^{\circ} \mathrm{C}$. Determine whether or not the insulation layer is sufficient to keep the outer surface temperature below \(45^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) to prevent thermal burn hazards. Discuss ways to further decrease the outer surface temperature. Evaluate the air properties at \(30^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and $1 \mathrm{~atm}$ pressure. Is this a good assumption?

Contact a manufacturer of aluminum heat sinks and obtain its product catalog for cooling electronic components by natural convection and radiation. Write an essay on how to select a suitable heat sink for an electronic component when its maximum power dissipation and maximum allowable surface temperature are specified.

An average person generates heat at a rate of \(240 \mathrm{Btu} / \mathrm{h}\) while resting in a room at \(70^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\). Assuming one-quarter of this heat is lost from the head and taking the emissivity of the skin to be \(0.9\), determine the average surface temperature of the head when it is not covered. The head can be approximated as a 12 -in-diameter sphere, and the interior surfaces of the room can be assumed to be at the room temperature.

Water is boiling in a 12 -cm-deep pan with an outer diameter of $25 \mathrm{~cm}$ that is placed on top of a stove. The ambient air and the surrounding surfaces are at a temperature of \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), and the emissivity of the outer surface of the pan is \(0.80\). Assuming the entire pan to be at an average temperature of \(98^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), determine the rate of heat loss from the cylindrical side surface of the pan to the surroundings by \((a)\) natural convection and \((b)\) radiation. (c) If water is boiling at a rate of \(1.5\) \(\mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{h}\) at \(100^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), determine the ratio of the heat lost from the side surfaces of the pan to that by the evaporation of water. The enthalpy of vaporization of water at \(100^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) is 2257 \(\mathrm{kJ} / \mathrm{kg}\). Answers: $46.2 \mathrm{~W}, 47.3 \mathrm{~W}, 0.099$

Consider three similar double-pane windows with air gap widths of 5,10 , and \(20 \mathrm{~mm}\). For which case will the heat transfer through the window be a minimum?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free