Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Physically, what does the Grashof number represent? How does the Grashof number differ from the Reynolds number?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The primary differences between Grashof number (Gr) and Reynolds number (Re) lie in their physical interpretations and the forces they compare. Grashof number characterizes fluid flows driven by natural convection, where temperature differences cause density variations leading to buoyancy forces. It compares buoyancy forces to viscous forces and is used to describe the significance of natural convection in various heat transfer problems. On the other hand, Reynolds number characterizes fluid flows driven by inertial forces, which relate to fluid velocity. It compares inertial forces to viscous forces and is used to describe the flow regime (laminar or turbulent) and predict the onset of turbulence.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of Grashof Number

The Grashof number (Gr) is a dimensionless number that is used to characterize fluid flows in the presence of a buoyancy-driven flow, or natural convection. It is defined as the ratio of the buoyancy force to the viscous force in the fluid. Mathematically, Grashof number is given by: Gr = \dfrac{g \beta \Delta TL^3}{\nu^2} where g is the acceleration due to gravity, \beta is the thermal expansion coefficient, \Delta T is the temperature difference between the fluid and its surroundings, L is the characteristic length, and \nu is the kinematic viscosity of the fluid.
02

Definition of Reynolds Number

The Reynolds number (Re) is another dimensionless number used in fluid mechanics to describe flow behavior. It is defined as the ratio of inertial forces to viscous forces in a fluid flow. Mathematically, Reynolds number is given by: Re = \dfrac{\rho uL}{\mu} = \dfrac{uL}{\nu} where \rho is the fluid density, u is the fluid velocity, L is the characteristic length, \mu is the dynamic viscosity, and \nu is the kinematic viscosity of the fluid.
03

Physical Interpretation of Grashof Number

The Grashof number represents the relative importance of buoyancy-driven flow, or natural convection, in a fluid flow. A higher Grashof number indicates that buoyancy forces are more significant compared to viscous forces, leading to stronger natural convection. In this case, the heat transfer is primarily driven by the fluid motion due to density differences caused by temperature variations. On the other hand, a lower Grashof number suggests that viscous forces dominate over buoyancy forces, and natural convection is weaker or negligible.
04

Physical Interpretation of Reynolds Number

The Reynolds number represents the relative importance of inertial forces versus viscous forces in a fluid flow. A higher Reynolds number indicates that inertial forces are more significant compared to viscous forces, implying that the flow is more turbulent and less predictable. In this case, a momentum-driven (inertia) mechanical system is governing the fluid motion. Conversely, a lower Reynolds number suggests that viscous forces dominate over inertial forces, resulting in a more laminar, predictable flow.
05

Differences Between Grashof Number and Reynolds Number

The main differences between the Grashof number and Reynolds number are: 1. The Grashof number characterizes fluid flows driven by natural convection, where temperature differences cause density variations leading to buoyancy forces. In contrast, the Reynolds number characterizes fluid flows driven by inertial forces, which are related to fluid velocity. 2. The Grashof number compares buoyancy forces to viscous forces, while the Reynolds number compares inertial forces to viscous forces. 3. The Grashof number is used to describe the significance of natural convection in various heat transfer problems, whereas the Reynolds number is used to describe the flow regime (laminar or turbulent) and predict the onset of turbulence.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider an \(L \times L\) horizontal plate that is placed in quiescent air with the hot surface facing up. If the film temperature is \(20^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and the average Nusselt number in natural convection is of the form \(\mathrm{Nu}=C \mathrm{Ra}_{L}^{n}\), show that the average heat transfer coefficient can be expressed as $$ \begin{array}{ll} h=1.95(\Delta T / L)^{1 / 4} & 10^{4}<\mathrm{Ra}_{L}<10^{7} \\ h=1.79 \Delta T^{1 / 3} & 10^{7}<\mathrm{Ra}_{L}<10^{11} \end{array} $$

During a plant visit, it was observed that a \(1.5\)-m-high and \(1-\mathrm{m}\)-wide section of the vertical front section of a natural gas furnace wall was too hot to touch. The temperature measurements on the surface revealed that the average temperature of the exposed hot surface was \(110^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), while the temperature of the surrounding air was \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). The surface appeared to be oxidized, and its emissivity can be taken to be \(0.7\). Taking the temperature of the surrounding surfaces to be \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) also, determine the rate of heat loss from this furnace. The furnace has an efficiency of 79 percent, and the plant pays \(\$ 1.20\) per therm of natural gas. If the plant operates \(10 \mathrm{~h}\) a day, 310 days a year, and thus \(3100 \mathrm{~h}\) a year, determine the annual cost of the heat loss from this vertical hot surface on the front section of the furnace wall.

A \(50-\mathrm{cm} \times 50-\mathrm{cm}\) circuit board that contains 121 square chips on one side is to be cooled by combined natural convection and radiation by mounting it on a vertical surface in a room at $25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\(. Each chip dissipates \)0.18 \mathrm{~W}$ of power, and the emissivity of the chip surfaces is 0.7. Assuming the heat transfer from the back side of the circuit board to be negligible, and the temperature of the surrounding surfaces to be the same as the air temperature of the room, determine the surface temperature of the chips. Evaluate air properties at a film temperature of \(30^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and \(1 \mathrm{~atm}\) pressure. Is this a good assumption? Answer: \(36.2^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\)

Hot engine oil is being transported in a horizontal pipe $\left(k=15 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}, D_{i}=5 \mathrm{~cm}\right)$ with a wall thickness of \(5 \mathrm{~mm}\). The pipe is covered with a \(5-\mathrm{mm}\)-thick layer of insulation $(k=0.15 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K})\(. A length of \)2 \mathrm{~m}$ of the outer surface is exposed to cool air at \(10^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). If the pipe inner surface temperature is at \(90^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), determine the outer surface temperature. Hint: The pipe outer surface temperature has to be found iteratively. Begin the calculations by using a film temperature of $50^{\circ} \mathrm{C}$.

A group of 25 power transistors, dissipating \(1.5 \mathrm{~W}\) each, are to be cooled by attaching them to a black-anodized square aluminum plate and mounting the plate on the wall of a room at \(30^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). The emissivity of the transistor and the plate surfaces is 0.9. Assuming the heat transfer from the back side of the plate to be negligible and the temperature of the surrounding surfaces to be the same as the air temperature of the room, determine the size of the plate if the average surface temperature of the plate is not to exceed \(50^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). Answer: $43 \mathrm{~cm} \times 43 \mathrm{~cm}$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free