Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In flow over cylinders, why does the drag coefficient suddenly drop when the flow becomes turbulent? Isn't turbulence supposed to increase the drag coefficient instead of decreasing it?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Explain why the drag coefficient in flow over cylinders suddenly drops when the flow becomes turbulent, despite the common perception that turbulence should increase the drag coefficient. Answer: The drag coefficient in flow over cylinders decreases when the flow becomes turbulent due to the delayed separation of flow, resulting in a smaller wake region and reduced pressure drag. Although turbulence does increase the skin friction drag, the overall drag coefficient drops mainly because this increase in skin friction drag is not enough to outweigh the significant reduction in pressure drag caused by the delayed flow separation.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Laminar and Turbulent Flow

Laminar flow is a smooth and orderly flow of fluid, where the fluid particles move in parallel layers with minimal mixing between them. Turbulent flow, on the other hand, is a chaotic and highly disordered flow, where the fluid particles move in unpredictable patterns, causing them to mix and create eddies and swirls.
02

Drag Coefficient

The drag coefficient, denoted by Cd, is a dimensionless quantity that describes the resistance of an object (in this case, a cylinder) to the flow of fluid around it. The drag coefficient not only depends on the shape and size of the object but also on the properties of the fluid and the flow conditions.
03

Separation of Flow

When fluid flows around a cylinder, the flow separates at the rear side of the cylinder, forming low-pressure wake regions behind the object. In laminar flow, this separation occurs early, leading to a large wake region and higher pressure drag. In turbulent flow, the separation of flow happens further downstream and results in a smaller wake region, reducing the pressure drag.
04

Boundary Layer Transition

The transition from laminar to turbulent flow in the boundary layer (layer near the surface of the cylinder) plays a significant role in reducing the drag coefficient. In turbulent boundary layers, there is enhanced momentum transfer and better attachment of the flow to the surface of the cylinder due to the mixing of the fluid. This delayed separation of flow reduces the size of the wake region and decreases the overall pressure drag.
05

Increase in Skin Friction Drag

It is important to note that turbulent flow does indeed increase the skin friction drag (friction between the fluid and the cylinder surface). However, this increase in skin friction drag is not enough to outweigh the significant reduction in pressure drag caused by the delayed flow separation. As a result, the overall drag coefficient decreases when the flow becomes turbulent.
06

Conclusion

In summary, the drag coefficient in flow over cylinders decreases when the flow becomes turbulent due to the delayed separation of flow. Although turbulence increases the skin friction drag, the overall drag coefficient is decreased primarily because of the significant reduction in pressure drag caused by the smaller wake region and delayed flow separation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Air at \(15^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) flows over a flat plate subjected to a uniform heat flux of \(240 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\) with a velocity of $3.5 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}\(. The surface temperature of the plate \)6 \mathrm{~m}$ from the leading edge is (a) \(40.5^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) (b) \(41.5^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) (c) \(58.2^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) (d) \(95.4^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) (e) \(134^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) (For air, use $k=0.02551 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}, \operatorname{Pr}=0.7296, \nu=1.562 \times\( \)10^{-5} \mathrm{~m}^{2} / \mathrm{s}$ )

What is the effect of surface roughness on the friction drag coefficient in laminar and turbulent flows?

Jakob (1949) suggests the following correlation be used for square tubes in a liquid crossflow situation: $$ \mathrm{Nu}=0.102 \mathrm{Re}^{0.625} \mathrm{Pr}^{1 / 3} $$ Water \((k=0.61 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}, \mathrm{Pr}=6)\) flows across a \(1-\mathrm{cm}-\) square tube with a Reynolds number of 10,000 . The convection heat transfer coefficient is (a) \(5.7 \mathrm{~kW} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\) (b) \(8.3 \mathrm{~kW} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\) (c) \(11.2 \mathrm{~kW} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\) (d) \(15.6 \mathrm{~kW} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\) (e) \(18.1 \mathrm{~kW} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\)

Air at \(20^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) flows over a 4-m-long and 3-m-wide surface of a plate whose temperature is \(80^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) with a velocity of $5 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}$. The rate of heat transfer from the laminar flow region of the surface is (a) \(950 \mathrm{~W}\) (b) \(1037 \mathrm{~W}\) (c) \(2074 \mathrm{~W}\) (d) \(2640 \mathrm{~W}\) (e) \(3075 \mathrm{~W}\) (For air, use $k=0.02735 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}, \operatorname{Pr}=0.7228, \nu=1.798 \times\( \)10^{-5} \mathrm{~m}^{2} / \mathrm{s}$ )

A cylindrical rod is placed in a crossflow of air at $20^{\circ} \mathrm{C}(1 \mathrm{~atm})\( with velocity of \)10 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}$. The rod has a diameter of \(5 \mathrm{~mm}\) and a constant surface temperature of \(120^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). Determine \((a)\) the average drag coefficient, \((b)\) the convection heat transfer coefficient using the Churchill and Bernstein relation, and (c) the convection heat transfer coefficient using Table 7-1.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free