Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider steady two-dimensional heat transfer in a long solid bar $(k=25 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K})\( of square cross section ( \)3 \mathrm{~cm} \times 3 \mathrm{~cm}$ ) with the prescribed temperatures at the top, right, bottom, and left surfaces to be $100^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 200^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 300^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\(, and \)500^{\circ} \mathrm{C}$, respectively. Heat is generated in the bar uniformly at a rate of $\dot{e}=5 \times 10^{6} \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\(. Using a uniform mesh size \)\Delta x=\Delta y=1 \mathrm{~cm}\(, determine \)(a)$ the finite difference equations and \((b)\) the nodal temperatures with the Gauss-Seidel iterative method.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Calculate the nodal temperatures within a square solid bar given the following conditions: thermal conductivity (\(k\)) of 25 \(W/mK\), dimensions of 3 cm by 3 cm, surface temperatures of 100°C, 200°C, 300°C, and 500°C, a heat generation rate of \(5 \times 10^{6} W/m^3\), and a mesh size of 1 cm. Use the Gauss-Seidel iterative method for the calculations.

Step by step solution

01

Parameters and Constants

First, record all the given data which includes the thermal conductivity (\(k\)), dimensions of the bar, prescribed temperatures at the surfaces, continuous heat generation, and mesh size. Thermal Conductivity, \(k = 25 \frac{W}{mK}\) Dimensions of the bar: \(3cm \times 3cm\) Surface Temperatures: Top (\(T_t = 100^{\circ}C\)), Right (\(T_r = 200^{\circ}C\)), Bottom (\(T_b = 300^{\circ}C\)), Left (\(T_l = 500^{\circ}C\)) Heat generation rate, \(\dot{e} = 5 \times 10^{6} \frac{W}{m^3}\) Mesh size, \(\Delta x = \Delta y = 1cm = 0.01m\)
02

Derive the Finite Difference Equation

For steady two-dimensional heat transfer, the governing equation can be expressed as: \(\frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial x^2}+\frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial y^2}=\frac{\dot{e}}{k}\) Using the finite difference approximations for the second-order derivatives, we get: \(\frac{T_{i+1,j}-2T_{i,j}+T_{i-1,j}}{(\Delta x)^2}+\frac{T_{i,j+1}-2T_{i,j}+T_{i,j-1}}{(\Delta y)^2}=\frac{\dot{e}}{k}\) Since we have a uniform mesh size (\(\Delta x=\Delta y\)), we can simplify the equation to: \(T_{i+1,j}+T_{i-1,j}+T_{i,j+1}+T_{i,j-1}-4T_{i,j}=\frac{\dot{e}(\Delta x)^2}{k}\) This is the finite difference equation in terms of nodal temperatures.
03

Define the Gauss-Seidel Iterative Method

The Gauss-Seidel iterative method updates the nodal temperatures using the neighbors' values. We will apply this method to the problem at hand. The update formula for the nodal temperature can be obtained by rearranging the finite difference equation, isolating the term \(T_{i,j}\): \(T_{i,j}^{(k+1)}=\frac{1}{4}\left(T_{i+1,j}^{(k)}+T_{i-1,j}^{(k+1)}+T_{i,j+1}^{(k)}+T_{i,j-1}^{(k+1)}-\frac{\dot{e}(\Delta x)^2}{k}\right)\) Where \(k\) denotes the iteration number.
04

Implementation of Gauss-Seidel Iterative Method

We now proceed to implement the iterative method. We initialize the nodal temperatures using the given surface temperatures: \(T_t, T_r, T_b, T_l\). Iteratively update the nodal temperatures using the above equation until convergence is reached, i.e., the nodal temperatures change very little between iterations. Adjust the stopping criterion accordingly.
05

Calculate the Nodal Temperatures

Following the iterative method implementation, calculate the nodal temperatures until convergence is achieved. The result will be the temperatures at the nodes within the solid bar. In conclusion, we have derived the finite difference equation for this problem and used the Gauss-Seidel iterative method to find the nodal temperatures within the bar.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Two 3-m-long and \(0.4\)-cm-thick cast iron \((k=52 \mathrm{~W} /\) $\mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}, \varepsilon=0.8)\( steam pipes of outer diameter \)10 \mathrm{~cm}$ are connected to each other through two 1 -cm-thick flanges of outer diameter \(20 \mathrm{~cm}\). The steam flows inside the pipe at an average temperature of \(250^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) with a heat transfer coefficient of \(180 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\). The outer surface of the pipe is exposed to convection with ambient air at $12^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\( with a heat transfer coefficient of \)25 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2}, \mathrm{~K}$ as well as radiation with the surrounding surfaces at an average temperature of \(T_{\text {surr }}=290 \mathrm{~K}\). Assuming steady onedimensional heat conduction along the flanges and taking the nodal spacing to be \(1 \mathrm{~cm}\) along the flange, \((a)\) obtain the finite difference formulation for all nodes, \((b)\) determine the temperature at the tip of the flange by solving those equations, and \((c)\) determine the rate of heat transfer from the exposed surfaces of the flange.

Consider a \(2-\mathrm{cm} \times 4-\mathrm{cm}\) ceramic strip $(k=3 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}\(, \)\rho=1600 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\(, and \)\left.c_{p}=800 \mathrm{~J} / \mathrm{kg} \cdot \mathrm{K}\right)$ embedded in very high conductivity material as shown in Fig. P5-131. The two sides of the ceramic strip are maintained at a constant temperature of \(300^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). The bottom surface of the strip is insulated, while the top surface is exposed to a convective environment with \(h=200 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\) and ambient temperature of \(50^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). Initially at \(t=0\), the ceramic strip is at a uniform temperature of \(300^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). Using the implicit finite difference formulation and a time step of \(2 \mathrm{~s}\), determine the nodal temperatures after \(12 \mathrm{~s}\) for a uniform mesh size of $1 \mathrm{~cm}$.

A cylindrical aluminum fin with adiabatic tip is attached to a wall with surface temperature of \(300^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), and it is exposed to an ambient air condition of \(15^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) with convection heat transfer coefficient of \(150 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\). The fin has a uniform cross section with diameter of \(1 \mathrm{~cm}\), length of $5 \mathrm{~cm}\(, and thermal conductivity of \)237 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}$. Assuming steady one-dimensional heat transfer along the fin and the nodal spacing to be uniformly \(10 \mathrm{~mm},(a)\) obtain the finite difference equations for use with the Gauss-Seidel iterative method, and \((b)\) determine the nodal temperatures using the Gauss-Seidel iterative method, and compare the results with the analytical solution.

What are the two basic methods of solution of transient problems based on finite differencing? How do heat transfer terms in the energy balance formulation differ in the two methods?

A stainless steel plate $(k=13 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}, 1 \mathrm{~cm}\( thick) is attached to an ASME SB-96 coppersilicon plate ( \)k=36 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}, 3 \mathrm{~cm}$ thick) to form a plane wall. The bottom surface of the ASME SB-96 plate (surface 1) is subjected to a uniform heat flux of \(750 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\). The top surface of the stainless steel plate (surface 2 ) is exposed to convection heat transfer with air at \(T_{\infty}=20^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), and thermal radiation with the surroundings at \(T_{\text {surr }}=20^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). The combined heat transfer coefficient for convection and radiation is \(h_{\mathrm{comb}}=7.76 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\). The ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME BPVC.IV-2015, HF-300) limits equipment constructed with ASME SB-96 plate to be operated at a temperature not exceeding \(93^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). Using the finite difference method with a uniform nodal spacing of \(\Delta x=5 \mathrm{~mm}\) along the plate thicknesses, determine the temperature at each node. Would the use of the ASME SB-96 plate under these conditions be in compliance with the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code? What is the highest heat flux that the bottom surface can be subjected to such that the ASME SB-96 plate is still operating below \(93^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) ?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free