Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider a rectangular metal block $(k=35 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K})\( of dimensions \)100 \mathrm{~cm} \times 75 \mathrm{~cm}$ subjected to a sinusoidal temperature variation at its top surface while its bottom surface is insulated. The two sides of the metal block are exposed to a convective environment at \(15^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and have a heat transfer coefficient of \(50 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\). \(\mathrm{K}\). The sinusoidal temperature distribution at the top surface is given as $100 \sin (\pi x / L)\(. Using a uniform mesh size of \)\Delta x=\Delta y=25 \mathrm{~cm}$, determine \((a)\) finite difference equations and \((b)\) the nodal temperatures.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Determine the finite difference equations and nodal temperatures for a rectangular metal block subjected to a sinusoidal temperature variation at the top surface, insulated at the bottom surface, and exposed to a convective environment on the two sides using a uniform mesh size. Answer: To determine the finite difference equations and nodal temperatures for the given metal block, we followed the following steps: 1. Divided the metal block into a 4x3 grid with a uniform mesh size of 25 cm and applied boundary conditions. 2. Applied the steady-state heat conduction equation for each internal node (excluding boundary nodes). 3. Obtained the finite difference equations by discretizing the governing equation for each internal node using central difference approximation. The finite difference equations are: Node (2,2): 35 * [(T_(3,2) - 2 * T_(2,2) + T_(1,2))/625 + (T_(2,3) - 2 * T_(2,2) + T_(2,1))/625] = 0 Node (2,3): 35 * [(T_(3,3) - 2 * T_(2,3) + T_(1,3))/625 + (T_(2,4) - 2 * T_(2,3) + T_(2,2))/625] = 0 Node (3,2): 35 * [(T_(4,2) - 2 * T_(3,2) + T_(2,2))/625 + (T_(3,3) - 2 * T_(3,2) + T_(3,1))/625] = 0 Node (3,3): 35 * [(T_(4,3) - 2 * T_(3,3) + T_(2,3))/625 + (T_(3,4) - 2 * T_(3,3) + T_(3,2))/625] = 0 4. Solved the system of finite difference equations to obtain nodal temperatures using numerical techniques such as Gauss-Seidel method, Jacobi method, or a matrix solver.

Step by step solution

01

1. Define the nodes and apply boundary conditions

The first step is to divide the metal block into a mesh using the given uniform mesh size of Δx = Δy = 25 cm. This will result in a 4x3 grid, with 12 nodes in total. Now, we need to apply the boundary conditions: Top surface: The sinusoidal temperature distribution is given as T(x) = 100 * sin(pi*x / L), where L is width of the metal block (100 cm). Bottom surface: Insulated, so there is no heat transfer. Side surface: Exposed to convective environment at 15ºC, with heat transfer coefficient (h) = 50 W/m²·K.
02

2. Apply governing equation for each internal node

For each internal node (i, j) (excluding boundary nodes), we will apply the steady-state heat conduction equation with no heat generation: k * (d²T/dx² + d²T/dy²) = 0
03

3. Obtain finite difference equations by discretizing the governing equations for each node

We will discretize the above governing equation for each internal node using the central difference approximation: k * [(T_(i+1,j) - 2 * T_(i,j) + T_(i-1,j))/Δx² + (T_(i,j+1) - 2 * T_(i,j) + T_(i,j-1))/Δy²] = 0 For the 6 internal nodes, we can write 6 equations: Node (2,2): 35 * [(T_(3,2) - 2 * T_(2,2) + T_(1,2))/625 + (T_(2,3) - 2 * T_(2,2) + T_(2,1))/625] = 0 Node (2,3): 35 * [(T_(3,3) - 2 * T_(2,3) + T_(1,3))/625 + (T_(2,4) - 2 * T_(2,3) + T_(2,2))/625] = 0 Node (3,2): 35 * [(T_(4,2) - 2 * T_(3,2) + T_(2,2))/625 + (T_(3,3) - 2 * T_(3,2) + T_(3,1))/625] = 0 Node (3,3): 35 * [(T_(4,3) - 2 * T_(3,3) + T_(2,3))/625 + (T_(3,4) - 2 * T_(3,3) + T_(3,2))/625] = 0 To account for the boundary conditions, we will modify these equations for the adjacent boundary nodes.
04

4. Solve the finite difference equations to get the nodal temperatures

Now, we have a system of finite difference equations with boundary conditions. We need to solve these equations to find the nodal temperatures T_(i,j). This can be done using standard numerical techniques such as the Gauss-Seidel method, the Jacobi method, or a matrix solver. After solving the system of equations, we will obtain the nodal temperatures for every internal node, which will be our answer to part (b) of the exercise.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What is a practical way of checking if the discretization error has been significant in calculations?

The unsteady forward-difference heat conduction for a constant-area \((A)\) pin fin with perimeter \(p\), when exposed to air whose temperature is \(T_{0}\) with a convection heat transfer coefficient of \(h\), is $$ \begin{aligned} T_{m}^{*+1}=& \frac{k}{\rho c_{p} \Delta x^{2}}\left[T_{m-1}^{*}+T_{m+1}^{*}+\frac{h p \Delta x^{2}}{A} T_{0}\right] \\\ &-\left[1-\frac{2 k}{\rho c_{p} \Delta x^{2}}-\frac{h p}{\rho c_{p} A}\right] T_{m}^{*} \end{aligned} $$ In order for this equation to produce a stable solution, the quantity $\frac{2 k}{\rho c_{p} \Delta x^{2}}+\frac{h p}{\rho c_{p} A}$ must be (a) negative (b) zero (c) positive (d) greater than 1 (e) less than 1

What are the two basic methods of solution of transient problems based on finite differencing? How do heat transfer terms in the energy balance formulation differ in the two methods?

Consider a stainless steel spoon $(k=15.1 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}\(, \)\varepsilon=0.6$ ) that is partially immersed in boiling water at \(100^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) in a kitchen at \(32^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). The handle of the spoon has a cross section of about $0.2 \mathrm{~cm} \times 1 \mathrm{~cm}\( and extends \)18 \mathrm{~cm}$ in the air from the free surface of the water. The spoon loses heat by convection to the ambient air with an average heat transfer coefficient of $h=13 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}$ as well as by radiation to the surrounding surfaces at an average temperature of \(T_{\text {surr }}=295 \mathrm{~K}\). Assuming steady one- dimensional heat transfer along the spoon and taking the nodal spacing to be \(3 \mathrm{~cm},(a)\) obtain the finite difference formulation for all nodes, \((b)\) determine the temperature of the tip of the spoon by solving those equations, and (c) determine the rate of heat transfer from the exposed surfaces of the spoon.

Why do the results obtained using a numerical method differ from the exact results obtained analytically? What are the causes of this difference?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free