Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider steady two-dimensional heat conduction in a square cross section $(3 \mathrm{~cm} \times 3 \mathrm{~cm}, k=20 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}, \alpha=6.694 \times\( \)10^{-6} \mathrm{~m}^{2} / \mathrm{s}$ ) with constant prescribed temperature of \(100^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and $300^{\circ} \mathrm{C}$ at the top and bottom surfaces, respectively. The left surface is exposed to a constant heat flux of \(1000 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\), while the right surface is in contact with a convective environment $\left(h=45 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\right)\( at \)20^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\(. Using a uniform mesh size of \)\Delta x=\Delta y\(, determine \)(a)$ finite difference equations and \((b)\) the nodal temperatures using the Gauss- Seidel iteration method.

Short Answer

Expert verified
In this exercise, we analyzed the two-dimensional heat conduction in a square with dimensions \(3\, \mathrm{cm} \times 3\, \mathrm{cm}\). We were given the constant prescribed temperatures at the top and bottom surfaces and the constant heat flux on the left surface and the convective environment on the right surface. Our primary goals were to determine: a) The finite difference equations for the given conditions b) The nodal temperatures using the Gauss-Seidel iteration method We started by defining the problem variables and dimensions and setting up the finite difference grid. Then, we applied the boundary conditions and developed the finite difference equations for the interior nodes. Finally, we applied the Gauss-Seidel iteration method to obtain the nodal temperatures throughout the square.

Step by step solution

01

Define problem variables and dimensions

Start by defining the variables given in the problem: - Side length of the square, \(L=3\) cm - Thermal conductivity, \(k=20\) W/m·K - Heat diffusion coefficient, \(\alpha=6.694 \times 10^{-6} \,\text{m}^2/\text{s}\) - Heat flux on the left surface, \(q=1000\) W/m² - Convective heat transfer coefficient on the right surface, \(h=45\) W/m²·K - Ambient temperature on the right surface, \(T_{\infty}=20^\circ\) C Convert the side length to meters: \(L = 0.03\) m.
02

Set up the finite difference grid

Determine the number of nodes in the x and y directions (for example, \(3 \times 3\) nodes). Let \(\Delta x=\Delta y\). Divide the side length by the number of nodes to find the mesh size: - \(\Delta x = \Delta y = \frac{L}{3} = 0.01\) m
03

Apply boundary conditions

Apply the boundary conditions to the finite difference grid: - Top surface nodes: \(T(i,1)=100^\circ \, \mathrm{C}\) - Bottom surface nodes: \(T(i,3)=300^\circ \, \mathrm{C}\) - Left surface nodes: \(q=-k \frac{T(1,j)-T(2,j)}{\Delta x}=1000 \,\mathrm{W} \,/\, \mathrm{m}^{2}\) - Right surface nodes: \(-k\frac{T(3,j)-T(2,j)}{\Delta x}=h(T(3,j)-T_{\infty})\) Rearrange the left and right surface boundary conditions to express the temperatures of the left and right surface nodes in terms of their respective adjacent nodes temperatures: - Left surface nodes: \(T(1,j) = T(2,j) - 1000 \,\mathrm{W}\,/\,\mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \Delta x\,/\,k\) - Right surface nodes: \(T(3,j) = \frac{hk\Delta x}{h \cdot \Delta x+k}T_{\infty}+\frac{k^2}{h\cdot \Delta x+k} \cdot T(2,j)\)
04

Develop finite difference equations for interior nodes

Develop the finite difference equation for an interior node with coordinates \((i, j)\): \(T(i,j) = \frac{1}{4}\left[T(i+1,j) + T(i-1,j) + T(i,j+1) + T(i,j-1)\right]\)
05

Apply the Gauss-Seidel iteration method

Start with an initial guess for the nodal temperatures, and apply the Gauss-Seidel iteration method using the boundary conditions and finite difference equations to update the nodal temperatures. Iterate until the difference between consecutive nodal temperatures is below a chosen tolerance value. The final nodal temperatures after convergence will provide an approximation for the temperature distribution throughout the square with the given boundary conditions. In this problem, the primary emphasis is on setting up the finite difference equations and nodal temperatures using the Gauss-Seidel method. With the individual steps laid out, it should be relatively straightforward to apply these steps to solve this specific problem.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Solar radiation incident on a large body of clean water $\left(k=0.61 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}\right.\( and \)\left.\alpha=0.15 \times 10^{-6} \mathrm{~m}^{2} / \mathrm{s}\right)$ such as a lake, a river, or a pond is mostly absorbed by water, and the amount of absorption varies with depth. For solar radiation incident at a \(45^{\circ}\) angle on a \(1-\mathrm{m}\)-deep large pond whose bottom surface is black (zero reflectivity), for example, \(2.8\) percent of the solar energy is reflected back to the atmosphere, \(37.9\) percent is absorbed by the bottom surface, and the remaining \(59.3\) percent is absorbed by the water body. If the pond is considered to be four layers of equal thickness \((0.25 \mathrm{~m}\) in this case), it can be shown that \(47.3\) percent of the incident solar energy is absorbed by the top layer, \(6.1\) percent by the upper mid layer, \(3.6\) percent by the lower mid layer, and 2.4 percent by the bottom layer [for more information, see Cengel and Ozi?ik, Solar Energy, 33, no. 6 (1984), pp. 581-591]. The radiation absorbed by the water can be treated conveniently as heat generation in the heat transfer analysis of the pond. Consider a large \(1-\mathrm{m}\)-deep pond that is initially at a uniform temperature of \(15^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) throughout. Solar energy is incident on the pond surface at \(45^{\circ}\) at an average rate of $500 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2}$ for a period of 4 h. Assuming no convection currents in the water and using the explicit finite difference method with a mesh size of \(\Delta x=0.25 \mathrm{~m}\) and a time step of \(\Delta t=15 \mathrm{~min}\), determine the temperature distribution in the pond under the most favorable conditions (i.e., no heat losses from the top or bottom surfaces of the pond). The solar energy absorbed by the bottom surface of the pond can be treated as a heat flux to the water at that surface in this case.

Using appropriate software, solve these systems of algebraic equations. (a) \(\quad 3 x_{1}-x_{2}+3 x_{3}=0\) $$ \begin{array}{r} -x_{1}+2 x_{2}+x_{3}=3 \\ 2 x_{1}-x_{2}-x_{3}=2 \end{array} $$ (b) $$ \begin{aligned} 4 x_{1}-2 x_{2}^{2}+0.5 x_{3} &=-2 \\ x_{1}^{3}-x_{2}+x_{3} &=11.964 \\ x_{1}+x_{2}+x_{3} &=3 \end{aligned} $$ Answers: \((a) x_{1}=2, x_{2}=3, x_{3}=-1,(b) x_{1}=2.33, x_{2}=2.29\), \(x_{3}=-1.62\)

Using appropriate software, solve these systems of algebraic equations. (a) $$ \begin{aligned} 4 x_{1}-x_{2}+2 x_{3}+x_{4} &=-6 \\ x_{1}+3 x_{2}-x_{3}+4 x_{4} &=-1 \\ -x_{1}+2 x_{2}+5 x_{4} &=5 \\ 2 x_{2}-4 x_{3}-3 x_{4} &=-5 \end{aligned} $$ (b) $$ \begin{aligned} 2 x_{1}+x_{2}^{4}-2 x_{3}+x_{4} &=1 \\ x_{1}^{2}+4 x_{2}+2 x_{3}^{2}-2 x_{4} &=-3 \\ -x_{1}+x_{2}^{4}+5 x_{3} &=10 \\ 3 x_{1}-x_{3}^{2}+8 x_{4} &=15 \end{aligned} $$

In the energy balance formulation of the finite difference method, it is recommended that all heat transfer at the boundaries of the volume element be assumed to be into the volume element even for steady heat conduction. Is this a valid recommendation even though it seems to violate the conservation of energy principle?

Consider steady one-dimensional heat conduction in a pin fin of constant diameter \(D\) with constant thermal conductivity. The fin is losing heat by convection with the ambient air at \(T_{\infty}\left(\right.\) in ${ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\( ) with a convection coefficient of \)h$, and by radiation to the surrounding surfaces at an average temperature of \(T_{\text {sur }}\) (in \(\mathrm{K}\) ). The nodal network of the fin consists of nodes 0 (at the base), 1 (in the middle), and 2 (at the fin tip) with a uniform nodal spacing of \(\Delta x\). Using the energy balance approach, obtain the finite difference formulation of this problem for the case of a specified temperature at the fin base and convection and radiation heat transfer at the fin tip.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free