Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider a medium in which the finite difference formulation of a general interior node is given in its simplest form as $$ T_{\text {node }}=\left(T_{\text {beft }}+T_{\text {top }}+T_{\text {right }}+T_{\text {bottom }}\right) / 4 $$ (a) Is heat transfer in this medium steady or transient? (b) Is heat transfer one-, two-, or three-dimensional? (c) Is there heat generation in the medium? (d) Is the nodal spacing constant or variable? (e) Is the thermal conductivity of the medium constant or variable?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Based on the given finite difference formulation, determine the characteristics of the medium in which this formulation is applicable, including whether the heat transfer is steady or transient, one-, two- or three-dimensional, if there is heat generation, if the nodal spacing is constant or variable, and if the thermal conductivity is constant or variable.

Step by step solution

01

Question (a) - Steady or Transient

The given formula for the temperature of a node is independent of time, which means that the temperatures of nodes do not change with time. Therefore, the heat transfer in this medium is steady.
02

Question (b) - Dimensionality

The formula includes temperature terms from four neighboring nodes: left, top, right, and bottom. As a result, we can determine that the heat transfer is happening in two axes (x and y). Hence, the heat transfer is two-dimensional.
03

Question (c) - Heat Generation

Since the given finite difference formulation only includes the average temperature from the neighboring nodes, without any additional terms, there is no heat generation in the medium.
04

Question (d) - Nodal Spacing

The given formula doesn't provide any specific information about nodal spacing. However, the formulation has a simple, averaged equation, which suggests that the nodal spacing is constant. A more complicated equation would be required if nodal spacing were variable.
05

Question (e) - Thermal Conductivity

As with nodal spacing, the given formula doesn't provide any specific information about the variation in thermal conductivity. Since the given formulation is simple and only consists of averaged temperature from the neighboring nodes, it is reasonable to assume that the thermal conductivity of the medium is constant. A more complex equation or additional terms would be required if the thermal conductivity were variable.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Starting with an energy balance on a volume element, obtain the two- dimensional transient explicit finite difference equation for a general interior node in rectangular coordinates for \(T(x, y, t)\) for the case of constant thermal conductivity and no heat generation.

Starting with an energy balance on a volume element, obtain the steady two- dimensional finite difference equation for a general interior node in rectangular coordinates for \(T(x, y)\) for the case of variable thermal conductivity and uniform heat generation.

Consider steady one-dimensional heat conduction in a pin fin of constant diameter \(D\) with constant thermal conductivity. The fin is losing heat by convection to the ambient air at \(T_{\infty}\) with a heat transfer coefficient of \(h\). The nodal network of the fin consists of nodes 0 (at the base), 1 (in the middle), and 2 (at the fin tip) with a uniform nodal spacing of $\Delta x$. Using the energy balance approach, obtain the finite difference formulation of this problem to determine \(T_{1}\) and \(T_{2}\) for the case of specified temperature at the fin base and negligible heat transfer at the fin tip. All temperatures are in \({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\).

Suggest some practical ways of reducing the roundoff error.

Consider a house whose windows are made of \(0.375\)-in-thick glass $\left(k=0.48 \mathrm{Btu} / \mathrm{h} \cdot \mathrm{ft} \cdot{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\right.\( and \)\alpha=4.2 \times\( \)10^{-6} \mathrm{ft}^{2} / \mathrm{s}$ ). Initially, the entire house, including the walls and the windows, is at the outdoor temperature of \(T_{o}=35^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\). It is observed that the windows are fogged because the indoor temperature is below the dew-point temperature of \(54^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\). Now the heater is turned on, and the air temperature in the house is raised to $T_{i}=72^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\( at a rate of \)2^{\circ} \mathrm{F}$ rise per minute. The heat transfer coefficients at the inner and outer surfaces of the wall can be taken to be \(h_{i}=1.2\) and $h_{o}=2.6 \mathrm{Btu} / \mathrm{h} \cdot \mathrm{ft}^{2}{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{F}$, respectively, and the outdoor temperature can be assumed to remain constant.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free