Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A stainless steel plate is connected to an insulation plate by square ASTM A479 904L stainless steel bars. Each square bar has a thickness of $1 \mathrm{~cm}\( and a length of \)5 \mathrm{~cm}$. The bars are exposed to convection heat transfer with a hot gas. The temperature of the hot gas is \(300^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) with a convection heat transfer coefficient of $25 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2}$. . The thermal conductivity for ASTM A479 904L stainless steel is known to be \(12 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}\). The stainless steel plate maintains a uniform temperature of $100^{\circ} \mathrm{C}$. According to the ASME Code for Process Piping (ASME B31.3-2014, Table A-1M), the maximum use temperature for ASTM A479 904L stainless steel bar is \(260^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). Using the finite difference method with a uniform nodal spacing of \(\Delta x=5 \mathrm{~mm}\) along the bar, determine the temperature at each node. Compare the numerical results with the analytical solution. Plot the temperature distribution along the bar. Would any part of the ASTM A479 904L bars be above the maximum use temperature of \(260^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) ?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The finite difference method is used to solve the heat conduction problem for the stainless steel bar. In the end, we will evaluate if any part of the steel bars exceed the maximum use temperature of \(260^{\circ}\mathrm{C}\) according to the ASME Code.

Step by step solution

01

Set up the differential equation

First, we need to set up the differential equation for heat conduction through the steel bars. We will use Fourier's law of heat conduction, which states that the heat flux \(q_x\) through a material is proportional to the temperature gradient: \(q_x = -k\frac{dT}{dx}\) where \(k\) is the thermal conductivity. Now let's consider the energy balance for a small volume element \(\Delta x\) along the bar: \(-q_x A - q_c A + q_{x+\Delta x} A = 0\) where \(q_c\) is the convective heat flux through the surface in contact with the hot gas, and \(A\) is the cross-sectional area of the bar. For the convection term, we can use Newton's law of cooling: \(q_c = h(T_{gas} - T)\) where \(h\) is the convection heat transfer coefficient and \(T_{gas}\) is the hot gas temperature. Combining the above equations and dividing by \(A\Delta x\), we get the differential equation for the temperature \(T\) as a function of position \(x\): \(\frac{d^2T}{dx^2} = \frac{h}{k}(T_{gas} - T)\) with boundary conditions \(T(0)=100^{\circ}\mathrm{C}\) and \(T(5)=T_{insulation}\), where \(T_{insulation}\) is the temperature at the insulation plate.
02

Apply the finite difference method

To solve this differential equation numerically, we will use the finite difference method with a uniform nodal spacing \(\Delta x=5\mathrm{~mm}\). We first need to discretize the equation and represent the derivatives using finite differences: \(\frac{T_{i+1} - 2T_{i} + T_{i-1}}{(\Delta x)^{2}} = \frac{h}{k}(T_{gas} - T_{i})\) where \(T_i\) is the temperature at node \(i\). We can write this equation for each node in the bar, solving for the unknown temperatures.
03

Solve the system of equations and find temperatures

Next, we need to solve the system of equations obtained by applying the finite difference method to find the temperatures at each node. We could use any method to solve this system of linear equations, such as Gaussian elimination.
04

Analytical solution

In order to compare our numerical results with the analytical solution, we need to derive the analytical solution for the temperature distribution. The differential equation we derived in Step 1 is a linear second-order ordinary differential equation with constant coefficients, which can be solved by the method of separation of variables. The analytical solution for the temperature distribution can be derived as: \(T(x) = T_{0} + \frac{T_{gas} - T_{0}}{L}x + \frac{h}{2k}(L - x)x\) where \(T_{0}\) is the initial temperature of the steel plate (\(100^{\circ}\mathrm{C}\)) and \(L\) is the length of the bar (\(5\mathrm{~cm}\)).
05

Plot temperature distribution and compare to the analytical solution

Now, we can plot the numerical temperature distribution we obtained from the finite difference method along the bar and compare it to the analytical solution derived in Step 4. This will help us visualize the temperature distribution and assess the accuracy of our numerical results.
06

Evaluate the maximum use temperature

Lastly, we need to check whether any part of the steel bars would be above the maximum use temperature of \(260^{\circ}\mathrm{C}\) according to the ASME Code. We can do this by finding the maximum temperature in the numerical temperature distribution and compare it to the maximum use temperature: \(\max(T_{i}) \leq 260^{\circ}\mathrm{C}\) If this condition is met, none of the steel bars would be above the maximum use temperature.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The finite difference formulation of steady two-dimensional heat conduction in a medium with heat generation and constant thermal conductivity is given by $$ \begin{gathered} \frac{T_{m-1, n}-2 T_{m, n}+T_{m+1, n}}{\Delta x^{2}}+\frac{T_{m, n-1}-2 T_{m, n}+T_{m, n+1}}{\Delta y^{2}} \\ +\frac{\dot{e}_{m, n}}{k}=0 \end{gathered} $$ in rectangular coordinates. Modify this relation for the threedimensional case.

The implicit method is unconditionally stable and thus any value of time step \(\Delta t\) can be used in the solution of transient heat conduction problems. To minimize the computation time, someone suggests using a very large value of \(\Delta t\) since there is no danger of instability. Do you agree with this suggestion? Explain.

A stainless steel plate $(k=13 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}, 1 \mathrm{~cm}\( thick) is attached to an ASME SB-96 coppersilicon plate ( \)k=36 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}, 3 \mathrm{~cm}$ thick) to form a plane wall. The bottom surface of the ASME SB-96 plate (surface 1) is subjected to a uniform heat flux of \(750 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\). The top surface of the stainless steel plate (surface 2 ) is exposed to convection heat transfer with air at \(T_{\infty}=20^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), and thermal radiation with the surroundings at \(T_{\text {surr }}=20^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). The combined heat transfer coefficient for convection and radiation is \(h_{\mathrm{comb}}=7.76 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\). The ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME BPVC.IV-2015, HF-300) limits equipment constructed with ASME SB-96 plate to be operated at a temperature not exceeding \(93^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). Using the finite difference method with a uniform nodal spacing of \(\Delta x=5 \mathrm{~mm}\) along the plate thicknesses, determine the temperature at each node. Would the use of the ASME SB-96 plate under these conditions be in compliance with the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code? What is the highest heat flux that the bottom surface can be subjected to such that the ASME SB-96 plate is still operating below \(93^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) ?

Consider a medium in which the finite difference formulation of a general interior node is given in its simplest form as $$ T_{\text {node }}=\left(T_{\text {beft }}+T_{\text {top }}+T_{\text {right }}+T_{\text {bottom }}\right) / 4 $$ (a) Is heat transfer in this medium steady or transient? (b) Is heat transfer one-, two-, or three-dimensional? (c) Is there heat generation in the medium? (d) Is the nodal spacing constant or variable? (e) Is the thermal conductivity of the medium constant or variable?

A hot brass plate is having its upper surface cooled by an impinging jet of air at a temperature of \(15^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and convection heat transfer coefficient of \(220 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\). The 10 -cm-thick brass plate $\left(\rho=8530 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{m}^{3}, c_{p}=380 \mathrm{~J} / \mathrm{kg} \cdot \mathrm{K}, k=110 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}\right.\(, and \)\alpha=33.9 \times 10^{-6} \mathrm{~m}^{2} / \mathrm{s}$ ) had a uniform initial temperature of \(650^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), and the lower surface of the plate is insulated. Using a uniform nodal spacing of \(\Delta x=2.5 \mathrm{~cm}\) and time step of \(\Delta t=10 \mathrm{~s}\), determine \((a)\) the implicit finite difference equations and \((b)\) the nodal temperatures of the brass plate after 10 seconds of cooling.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free