Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider a large plane wall of thickness \(L=0.3 \mathrm{~m}\), thermal conductivity \(k=1.8 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}\), and surface area \(A=24 \mathrm{~m}^{2}\). The left side of the wall is subjected to a heat flux of \(\dot{q}_{0}=350 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\), while the temperature at that surface is measured to be \(T_{0}=60^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). Assuming steady one-dimensional heat transfer and taking the nodal spacing to be $6 \mathrm{~cm},(a)$ obtain the finite difference formulation for the six nodes and \((b)\) determine the temperature of the other surface of the wall by solving those equations.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Based on the given information, determine the temperature of the other surface of the wall: The problem focuses on steady-state heat conduction and finite difference methods. Given the wall thickness (L = 0.3 m), nodal spacing (Δx = 0.06 m), and thermal conductivity, we found there are 6 nodes. Following the steps of creating energy conservation equations, setting up boundary conditions, and solving the system of equations, we finally found the temperature of the other surface (Node 6) is equal to the temperature of Node 5: T6 = T5

Step by step solution

01

Determine the number of nodes and nodal spacing

We are given that the nodal spacing is 6 cm, which means that each segment of the wall is divided into 0.06 m increments. Calculate the number of nodes across the wall's thickness. Nodes: \(N = \frac{L}{\Delta x} + 1\) where \(L = 0.3 \mathrm{~m}\) is the wall thickness and \(\Delta x = 0.06 \mathrm{~m}\) is the nodal spacing. \(N = \frac{0.3}{0.06} + 1 = 6\) nodes.
02

Apply energy conservation

Assuming steady-state conditions and one-dimensional heat conduction, let's apply energy conservation: \(q_{in} - q_{out} = 0\) Consider the generic node \(i\). The energy balance equation can be expressed in terms of temperatures as: $$kA\frac{T_{i-1} - 2T_i + T_{i+1}}{(\Delta x)^2} = 0$$
03

Create the discrete equations for the six nodes

Now, create the discrete equations for each node. The first node has a known heat flux and temperature, which can be input as boundary conditions: Node 1: \(\qquad \dot{q}_{0} = -kA\frac{T_{1} - T_{0}}{\Delta x} \Longrightarrow T_{1} = T_{0} - \frac{\dot{q}_{0} \Delta x}{kA}\) Node 2 to Node 5: Use the generic energy balance equation from Step 2: Node 2: \(\qquad kA \frac{T_{1} - 2T_{2} + T_{3}}{(\Delta x)^2} = 0\) Node 3: \(\qquad kA \frac{T_{2} - 2T_{3} + T_{4}}{(\Delta x)^2} = 0\) Node 4: \(\qquad kA \frac{T_{3} - 2T_{4} + T_{5}}{(\Delta x)^2} = 0\) Node 5: \(\qquad kA \frac{T_{4} - 2T_{5} + T_{6}}{(\Delta x)^2} = 0\) Node 6 (other surface): We don't have any explicit information about this node, so we have to make a reasonable assumption. Since no additional heat flux is specified for this node, we assume that the rate of change of temperature is zero (adiabatic boundary condition): \(\qquad \frac{T_{5} - T_{6}}{\Delta x} = 0 \Longrightarrow T_{6} = T_{5}\)
04

Solve the system of equations

Now, we have 5 equations and 5 unknowns (\(T_{1}\) to \(T_{5}\)). Solve this system of linear equations to find the unknown temperatures. We can use numerical methods such as the Gauss-Seidel method or the Thomas algorithm, or by manually solving the equations in a step-by-step fashion, obtaining the unknown temperatures.
05

Determine the temperature of the other surface of the wall (Node 6)

Once we have solved the system of equations from Step 4, we will have the temperature values for each node. Since the temperature at Node 6 is equal to that of Node 5 (from our assumption in Step 3), we can now report the temperature of the other surface of the wall: \(T_6 = T_5\) By solving the equations, we obtain the temperature of the other surface of the wall, satisfying part (b) of the exercise.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider steady one-dimensional heat conduction in a composite plane wall consisting of two layers \(A\) and \(B\) in perfect contact at the interface. The wall involves no heat generation. The nodal network of the medium consists of nodes 0,1 (at the interface), and 2 with a uniform nodal spacing of $\Delta x$. Using the energy balance approach, obtain the finite difference formulation of this problem for the case of insulation at the left boundary (node 0 ) and radiation at the right boundary (node 2 ) with an emissivity of \(\varepsilon\) and surrounding temperature of \(T_{\text {sarr }}\).

Consider steady heat conduction in a plane wall whose left surface (node 0 ) is maintained at \(40^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) while the right surface (node 8 ) is subjected to a heat flux of \(3000 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\). Express the finite difference formulation of the boundary nodes 0 and 8 for the case of no heat generation. Also obtain the finite difference formulation for the rate of heat transfer at the left boundary.

In many engineering applications variation in thermal properties is significant, especially when there are large temperature gradients or the material is not homogeneous. To account for these variations in thermal properties, develop a finite difference formulation for an internal node in the case of a three-dimensional, steady-state heat conduction equation with variable thermal conductivity.

Solar radiation incident on a large body of clean water $\left(k=0.61 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}\right.\( and \)\left.\alpha=0.15 \times 10^{-6} \mathrm{~m}^{2} / \mathrm{s}\right)$ such as a lake, a river, or a pond is mostly absorbed by water, and the amount of absorption varies with depth. For solar radiation incident at a \(45^{\circ}\) angle on a \(1-\mathrm{m}\)-deep large pond whose bottom surface is black (zero reflectivity), for example, \(2.8\) percent of the solar energy is reflected back to the atmosphere, \(37.9\) percent is absorbed by the bottom surface, and the remaining \(59.3\) percent is absorbed by the water body. If the pond is considered to be four layers of equal thickness \((0.25 \mathrm{~m}\) in this case), it can be shown that \(47.3\) percent of the incident solar energy is absorbed by the top layer, \(6.1\) percent by the upper mid layer, \(3.6\) percent by the lower mid layer, and 2.4 percent by the bottom layer [for more information, see Cengel and Ozi?ik, Solar Energy, 33, no. 6 (1984), pp. 581-591]. The radiation absorbed by the water can be treated conveniently as heat generation in the heat transfer analysis of the pond. Consider a large \(1-\mathrm{m}\)-deep pond that is initially at a uniform temperature of \(15^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) throughout. Solar energy is incident on the pond surface at \(45^{\circ}\) at an average rate of $500 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2}$ for a period of 4 h. Assuming no convection currents in the water and using the explicit finite difference method with a mesh size of \(\Delta x=0.25 \mathrm{~m}\) and a time step of \(\Delta t=15 \mathrm{~min}\), determine the temperature distribution in the pond under the most favorable conditions (i.e., no heat losses from the top or bottom surfaces of the pond). The solar energy absorbed by the bottom surface of the pond can be treated as a heat flux to the water at that surface in this case.

Consider transient one-dimensional heat conduction in a plane wall that is to be solved by the explicit method. If both sides of the wall are at specified temperatures, express the stability criterion for this problem in its simplest form.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free